zyxw
zyxwvutsrqpo
zyxwvutsrq
DrlS
COMMENT
The Cost of Insulin-dependent Diabetes
Mellitus (IDDM) in England and Wales
zyxwvutsrq
A. Grayarb, P.FennaTc and A. McCuireard
Oxford Centre for Health Economics Research”, Centre for SocioLegal Studies, Wolfson College, Oxfordb, School of Management and
Finance, University of Nottingham‘, and Department of Economics,
City University, London, U P
This study estimates the direct health and social care costs of insulin-dependent diabetes
mellitus (IDDM) in England and Wales in 1992 to be €96 million, or €1021 per person
in a population with IDDM estimated at 94000 individuals. These costs include insulin
maintenance, hospitalization, CP and out-patient consultations, renal replacement therapy,
and payments to informal carers. Expenditure i s concentrated on younger age groups,
with one-third of the total expended on those aged 0-24. Around one-half of the total
costs can be directly attributed to IDDM, with the remainder associated with a range of
complications of the disease. The single largest area of service expenditure is renal
replacement therapy. The cost estimates are most sensitive to incidence rates of IDDM,
numbers on dialysis and average duration of dialysis. A further €113 million pounds may
be lost each year due to premature deaths resulting in lost productive contributions to
the economy. The direct and indirect costs of IDDM are therefore significant. The cost
of illness framework presented here should facilitate the economic evaluation of new and
existing treatment regimens, which may improve value for money by reducing costs
and/or increasing the quality or quantity of life for people with IDDM.
KEY WORDS
Insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus Cost of illness Health economics
Introduction
further research i s required. The methodology of the
study differs from previous studies of diabetes in adopting
an incidence-based approach to estimate the population
with IDDM, and its mortality.
zyxwvutsr
zyxwvuts
Diabetes mellitus i s one of the most common chronic
diseases, and has major economic as well as health
implications for patients, health services, and society in
general. Laing’ used primary diagnosis as a basis for
costing with the finding that direct costs were f83.4
million and disability costs f60.9 million in 1979. Gerard
et
estimated the total cost of diabetes in 1984 to be
at least f259 million. Finally, Laing and Williams3 found
that the total costs of care of people with diabetes in
England and Wales were f484 million in 1986/7, or
almost 5 % of total expenditure on the National Health
Service (NHS).
However, none of these studies has attempted to
distinguish between insulin-dependent (Type 1 ) diabetes
mellitus (IDDM) and non-insulin-dependent (Type 2)
diabetes mellitus (NIDDM),although each has a different
epidemiology and therefore different economic and
policy implications. The aim of this study i s to provide
economic data relevant to decisions about the prevention
and treatment of IDDM, by estimating the direct and
indirect socio-economic costs of IDDM in England
and Wales in 1992 using a cost-of-illness approach.
Comparative information for other diseases is also
provided. Finally, the study illustrates some of the
difficulties involved in establishing the actual costs
associated with IDDM, and highlights areas in which
Correspondenceto: Dr A.M. Gray, Oxford Centre for Health Economics
Research, Wolfson College, Oxford, OX2 6UD, UK.
1068
CCC 0742-3071/95/121068-09
0 1995 by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Methods and Data
Cost of illness (or ’burden of illness’) analysis is a method
of calculating the resources used to prevent, detect, and
treat a disease, in absolute terms and in relation to other
diseases. The approach has been proposed as a way of
informing priority setting in biomedical r e ~ e a r c h ,and
~
can help to inform or monitor programmes of prevention
and treatment. It has been applied to a range of different
diseases, including Alzheimer’s di~ease,~
epilepsyt6 mig~ a i n e ,multiple
~
sclerosis,B ~ t r o k e , diabetes
~
mellitu~,~
and benign prostatic hyperplasia.’O
Such studies invariably include a range of direct costs
to the health and personal social services. Some studies
have also attempted to estimate indirect costs such as
the loss to society of productive output because of
sickness absence from work, early retirement, reduced
productivity or mortality. This raises a number of
methodological problems, for example concerning the
treatment of those not in formal employment. In this
study, indirect costs have been estimated, but are
presented separately from the direct costs.This ensures
comparability with the majority of other studies, and
focuses on the data most relevant to decision-makers.
In recent years increasing attention has also focused
on the role of informal carers and the burden of illness
DIABETIC MEDICINE, 1995; 12: 1068-1076
zyxw
DTT7
on relatives and friends. We recognize this as a potentially
important burden to measure, and have attempted to
quantify the informal care burden to the extent that it is
recompensed by the Social Security system.
There are two main ways of conducting cost-of-illness
studies. The first is a ’top-down‘ approach, based on
aggregate data on mortality, hospital admissions, GP
consultations etc. This approach takes advantage of
available national data, but may give a misleading picture
if the incidence of the disease in question i s changing
or has changed in the past. It also relies on aggregate
information being classified such that the disease of
interest is readily identifiable. The second main method
is a ’bottom-up’ approach, in which data on disease
incidence and prevalence are combined with information
on disease and treatment probabilities to construct an
estimate of the annual incidence of a range of treatments
with associated costs. This approach can make full use
of the international epidemiological data on incidence,
and is more flexible, but also more complex to set up.
This study makes use of a variant of the bottom-up
approach. The prevalence of I D D M has been estimated
using available information on incidence and survival
probabilities. The likelihood of hospitalization or of
other formal health care associated with I D D M or its
complications has then been applied to the estimated
total population of patients with I D D M to derive an
estimate of the annual volume of treatment. From this,
costs of treatment have been attached, giving a total
annual cost of illness associated with IDDM.
COMMENT
Pittsburgh,’ a seven-fold excess mortality was applied
to the England and Wales all-population age-specific
mortality rates to obtain an estimate of the survival of
patients with IDDM. This generated an estimate of the
total population with IDDM alive at a point in time, and
their age distribution. Life years lost and working years
lost were calculated by assuming that each individual
dying from a cause attributable to IDDM would otherwise
have lived for the remaining population life expectancy.
Morbidity and Health Service Utilization
At least four major categories of complications
accompany diabetes mellitus: cardiovascular and peripheral vascular complications, ophthalmic complications,
neurologic complications, and renal complications. Studies of the incidence and prevalence of these complications
frequently do not differentiate between patients with
I D D M and NIDDM. Retinopathy i s thought to be more
common among people with IDDM than NIDDM;
diabetic neuropathy may be more commonly associated
with I D D M than NIDDM; renal complications are
relatively common among all patients with diabetes, but
the population with IDDM has been estimated to be up
to 15 times more likely to experience end stage renal
disease than those with NIDDM.’4-’8
There i s very little information on the link between
diabetic morbidity and health service utilization. However, an American study has reported age-specific
hospitalization rates and lengths of stay for diabetes and
its complications in comparison with the non-diabetic
p o p ~ l a t i o n . ’The
~ study does not distinguish between
hospitalizations for IDDM and NIDDM, but does nevertheless represent the most detailed source of information
on the link between morbidity and hospital utilization,
and has been used in the baseline calculations of the
present study. We have assumed that hospitalization
rates for diabetes and its complications in England and
Wales are the same as in the USA. This assumption seems
reasonable given that acute hospital sector hospitalization
rates for all conditions in England and Wales are almost
identical to those in the USA: 1.29 and 1.34 per
thousand, respectively, in 1986.20 For hospitalizations
directly attributable to diabetes we have made use of
actual age-specific English lengths of stay derived from
Health Service Indicators. For complications of diabetes,
we have assumed that UK lengths of stay were the same
as in the USA: again, this assumption i s supported by
evidence that, for all acute admissions, the average
length of stay in England and Wales (7.8 days in 1986)
is virtually the same as in the USA (7.6 days).
O n the basis of the review of diabetic complications
above, we have assumed that the relative risk of
hospitafization is the same for patients with IDDM as
for the entire population with diabetes for vascular
disease and neurological complications, and double the
relative risk of the entire population with diabetes for
zyxwvutsrqpon
zyxwvut
Epidemiology of IDDM
Reliable information on the incidence of IDDM i s
comparatively rare, especially for adult age groups. A
recent study used prospective registration of new diagnoses of diabetes and hospital discharge and death
certificates to estimate the incidence of I D D M in the the
Oxford health region for the population under 21 during
1985/6.” These incidence figures have been used as the
baseline figures in this study, and applied to the total
population of England and Wales aged under 21, thus
generating a cohort of individuals with IDDM. It is
therefore assumed that the incidence of I D D M falls to
zero from the age of 21 onwards. Sensitivity analysis
was performed using the 95 % confidence intervals from
this study, and using data from a study in Rochester,
MinnesotaT2which reports incidence rates of I D D M for
all adult as well as juvenile age groups. This latter study
was not considered appropriate for the baseline analysis
because of the comparatively small size of the sample
(75 cases compared to 237 in the Oxford study), the
country of origin, and the age of the data (1945-69).
The subsequent survival of this cohort was then
calculated using available information on the excess
mortality risk of individuals with I D D M compared to the
population as whole. In line with the results of a
follow-up study of almost 2000 patients with IDDM in
COSTS OF IDDM IN ENGLAND AND WALES
zyxwv
1069
COMMENT
zyxw
ophthalmic and renal complications. These assumptions
have all been tested using sensitivity analyses.
In addition to in-patient utilization, people with IDDM
are much more likely to experience end-stage renal
disease, and therefore to be in need of renal replacement
treatment, which may or may not be hospital based.
There is substantial evidence that many patients with
diabetes in the UK who are suitable for renal replacement
treatment do not receive it;2' nevertheless, treatment
rates have been increasing and the European Dialysis
and Transplantation Association (EDTA) report that in
1989 10.4 Yo of patients in the UK accepted onto renal
replacement treatment had insulin-dependent diabetes.22,
2 3 In 1990 the rate at which new patients were accepted
for renal replacement therapy in the United Kingdom
. ~ ~ would indicate
was 60.7 per million p ~ p u l a t i o n This
3053 new patients in England and Wales, of whom 305
would have IDDM. This is the baseline figure used in
this study. Once accepted for renal replacement therapy,
it has been assumed for simplicity that all patients receive
continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD), the
most common treatment modality for people with diabetes. The duration of dialysis is taken to be 7 years,
which is the mean life expectancy of high risk patients
receiving independent dialysis according to survival
analyses of UK patients on the EDTA registry.24
Finally, a major item of health care is the routine
maintenance of insulin. In this study it is assumed that
all people with IDDM follow a standard regimen involving
routine blood glucose testing, subcutaneous injection of
42 units of insulin a day with a fresh hypodermic needle
daily, and routine out-patient consultations at 4-monthly
intervals. We therefore assume that insulin dependency
is synonymous with insulin treatment amongst people
with IDDM, and therefore that any 'honeymoon' period
i s so short that it has no major effect on insulin
maintenance costs.
DT17
was up-rated to €42.50 in 1992 prices.25 The average
cost of a primary care consultation consists of two
components: the time and services of the GP and the
costs of any pharmaceuticals prescribed. In 1990-91 the
cost per consultation averaged €9.46, and the average
cost of a prescription was f6.72. This gives a total of
€16.18, or f17.81 in 1992 prices.'"
The annual cost of renal replacement therapy using
CAPD was estimated at €13000 in 1990; 27 this was
updated to f 15 558 in 1992 prices. Assuming an average
duration of 7 years therapy, and discounted at 6 Yo per
annum so that all costs are given in present values, this
gives a dialysis cost averaging f86851 per individual.
Finally, the costs of routine insulin maintenance were
obtained from the 1992 tariffs for appliances and from
September 1992 MIMS. These gave annual costs of
€77.70 for blood glucose testing strips, f24.09 for
hypodermic needles, €1 45.50 for insulin, and f 127.50
for out-patient attendances, a total of €374.79 per person
with IDDM per year.
Surveys have confirmed that informal caring is a major
contributor to health care and may have substantial
financial consequences for carers.28,29 However, there
is no easy way of placing a value on services of such
carers, who mainly go unpaid. Here, we include only
informal care which is recompensed through the social
security system via Attendance Allowance or Invalid
Care Allowance, plus Mobility Allowance paid directly
to those with IDDM. These benefits are paid for specific
adaptations and aids, or for services rendered, and
are not strictly transfer payments which are normally
excluded from cost of illness studies as they comprise
money passed from one part of the population to another
as part of a general redistribution, with no net resource
consequences. It has been assumed that these payments
are three times as likely to be made to those with IDDM
as to the population as a whole. Age-specific payment
rates to the England and Wales population were therefore
trebled and applied to the age structure of the population
with IDDM. This estimate is varied in the sensitivity analysis.
To estimate the indirect costs associated with IDDM,
the average annual earnings of all male and female
manual and non-manual workers, of €12925 in 1990,
were multiplied by the average economic activity rate
(that is, the proportion of the population in or seeking
employment) for the relevant age group, and then by
the age-specific unemployment rate,3o to obtain an
estimate of the likely annual earnings that an individual
who died would otherwise have received from paid
employment. This was then multiplied by remaining
working years at death, and discounted at the Treasuryapproved public sector rate of 6 'YO per annum, to obtain
an estimate of the lifetime earnings loss from each death.
Finally, this was multiplied by the total number of deaths
from IDDM to obtain an estimate of the total annual
productive loss from mortality attributable to IDDM. It
was assumed that those who died before reaching
zyxwvuts
zyxwvutsrqp
zyxwvuts
zyxwvutsrqp
Resource Use and Costs
Information was collected from various sources on the
use of health care resources attributable to each associated
morbidity, to establish the direct costs of IDDM. The
average costs attributable to treatment episodes were
then used to calculate total direct costs. All costs are
expressed in 1992 prices, the most recent year for which
all price data are available. Cost data for particular
diagnostic categories are not routinely available in the
NHS at present. Consequently we use the national
average cost per in-patient day in acute or mainly acute
This was €145 in 1989-90 (€913 per case
with an average length of stay of 6.3 days), and was
updated to f 177 in 1992 prices using the Hospital and
Community Health Services Pay and Price Inflation
Index, as supplied by the Department of Health.
We estimated the cost of an average out-patient
attendance using the Department of Health's figure of
f27.85 in 1986/7 for acute non-teaching hospitals; this
1070
zyxw
zyx
A. GRAY ET AL.
zyx
Dm
zyxwvutsrqp
zyxwvutsrq
COMMENT
working age would otherwise have worked an average
working life with average wage rates, activity rates, and
unemployment rates.
Total Expenditure Related to IDDM
Tables 2 and 3 show the total health and social care
expenditure related to IDDM, by disease category (that
is, expenditure directly attributable to diabetes, or expenditure related to various complications) and by agegroup, respectively.
Table 2 shows that the total direct costs of IDDM in
1992 came to f95.6 million. The major costs of IDDM
are those directly attributable to the disease; these
account for €47.3 million, or 49 o/o of the total. Almost
half of these directly attributable costs are associated
with routine insulin maintenance (€23.1 million, made
up of €13.6 million on insulin, and €9.5 million on
blood glucose testing strips and syringe/needles). In
addition most of the f12.5 million spent on out-patient
consultations directly attributable to diabetes are routine
consultations associated with insulin maintenance. The
second most important disease category in expenditure
terms is renal complications, which account for a further
€30.2 million. Vascular complications account for just
under 5 %, of total costs, and ophthalmic and neurologic
complications each contribute around 1 O/O of the total.
The single most expensive area of service provision is
renal replacement therapy, which annually accounts for
f26.5 million or almost 28 Yo of the total costs of IDDM.
Routine insulin maintenance and hospital in-patient costs
are other major areas of service provision. Annually we
estimate a total of 19612 in-patient admissions, an
admission rate of 209 per 1000 population with IDDM.
Throughout the analysis we make a baseline assumption that each hospital admission is associated with 1 outpatient attendance and 3 GP consultations. In addition, it
is assumed that routine insulin maintenance involves 3
out-patient attendances per annum. Thus the total out
patient consultations comes to 300354, at an annual
cost of €12.8 million, or 13.3 Yo of total costs. Total
GP consultations come to 37690 annually, costing
approximately €1 million, or 1.1 o/o of the total costs
associated with IDDM.
zyxwvutsrqponm
zyxw
zyxw
Results
Incidence and Prevalence
Table 1 reports the total population of individuals with
IDDM estimated in this study at 93 581. Using previously
published estimates of the prevalence of IDDM and
NIDDM combined,” it can be calculated that our
estimated population with I D D M is approximately 19 Yo
of the total number of people with diabetes in England
and Wales, accounting for the entire population with
diabetes below the age of 20, falling to 18 Yo in the 5059 age group and less than 0.1 YO in the 70-79 age group.
life Years and Potential Working Years
1ost
The baseline analysis gives a total of 2014 deaths per
annum from IDDM, resulting in an annual loss of 50993
life years, and 23691 potential working years. These
figures are equivalent to 0.8 Yo of all life years lost, and
to 1.8 YO of all potential working years lost. IDDM
is therefore responsible for approximately the same
proportion of total life years lost as are all diseases of
the genitourinary system (0.9 Yo), and for a larger
proportion than are all infectious/parasitic diseases
(0.7 YO) or musculoskeletal diseases (0.7 %). The larger
impact on potential working years lost reflects the severity
of IDDM and its early onset.
The annual deaths from I D D M estimated in this study
result in a life expectancy at birth of 51 years compared
to 76 in the population as a whole, implying an average
of 25 years of life lost by each individual with IDDM: this
result is very similar to the estimates given by P a n ~ r a m . ~ ’
Table 1 . IDDM in England and Wales: baseline estimated population and prevalence
zy
Age
group
Population of
England and
Wales (000s)
Diabetes
prevalence
per 1000
Total
population
with diabetes
IDDM
population
IDDM
prevalence
per 1000
IDDM as YO of
total population
with diabetes
All
0-9
10-19
2 0-2 9
30-3 9
40-49
50-59
60-69
70-79
50 955
6 646
6315
8143
7 070
6814
5 292
5 040
3 701
1932
9.8
0.5
2
4
4.7
7.5
13.6
20.8
35.6
31.3
499 359
3 323
12 630
32 572
33 229
51 105
71 971
104 832
131 755
60 471
93 581
4 344
17191
19177
18 297
16 726
12615
5 048
182
1.84
0.65
2.72
2.36
2.59
2.45
2.38
1 .oo
0.05
0.00
19
100
100
59
55
33
18
5
0
0
>80
COSTS OF IDDM IN ENGLAND AND WALES
0
1071
COMMENT
zyxw
zyxwvu
Dm
Table 2. Total health and social security expenditure related to IDDM by disease category (f millions 1992)
Disease
category
Routine
insulin
maintenance
Hospital
costs
Directly attributable
to diabetes
93 581
23.1
11 .o
0.7
12.5
47.3
Vascular
compl ications
93 581
4.5
0.1
0.1
4.8
Ophthalmic
complications
93 581
1 .o
0.06
0.04
1.11
Neurological
complications
93 581
1.2
0.03
0.03
1.2
Renal complications
93 581
Total
93 581
Percent
General
practitioner
consulation
costs
Out-patient
consultation
costs
Cost of
social
security
non-transfer
payment
costs
Population
with IDDM
Renal
replacement
therapy
costs
Total
costs
3.5
0.1
0.09
26.5
30.2
23.1
21.1
1 .o
12.8
11 .o
26.5
95.6
24.2
22.1
1.1
13.3
11.5
27.7
100
zyxwvutsrqp
Finally, Table 2 summarizes the costs of social security
payments attributable to IDDM. In total, we estimate
that f l l million annually arises under this heading, of
which 45 % consists of mobility allowance payments
(f4.9 million), 39 70 consists of attendance allowance
(f4.3 million), and the remaining 16 % consists of invalid
care payments ( f l . 7 million).
Table 3 shows a similar breakdown of the total costs
of IDDM, but by age group. The largest share of
expenditure is incurred on younger age groups, with the
0-24 age group responsible for f32 million or 33 % of
the total, compared with just f6.2 million attributable
to the 65+ age group, or 6 Yo of the total. However, on
a cost per person basis, the highest costs are incurred
in the oldest age group (f3686 per person per year,
compared to f853 per person per year in the 25-44 age
group). In total, the €96 million annually expended on
GP, hospital, out-patient and social security related
services for people with IDDM works out at €1021 per
person with IDDM per year.
of IDDM. The table indicates that the annual total of
just over 2000 deaths among the population of IDDM
results in potential earnings losses equivalent to f 11 3
million in present values. This loss peaks in the 50-54
age group.
Sensitivity Analysis
Table 4 shows the estimated indirect costs-that is, costs
arising from lost production due to premature mortality-
Each of the main assumptions used in estimating the
cost of illness of IDDM has been varied in the model
to assess the sensitivity of the baseline results to these
assumptions. Table 5 reports the results of this sensitivity
analysis with respect to the total cost of IDDM.
Reducing the excess mortality risk of IDDM increases
the size of the population with IDDM and its annual
hospitalizations, and therefore increases the total burden
associated with IDDM to approximately f102 million
annually. Increasing the excess mortality risk has the
opposite effect, reducing the burden to f85 million annually.
Using the 95 % confidence intervals around the
baseline incidence rates,” the total annual cost of IDDM
varies from f77 million to €113 million. Incidence is
therefore the key parameter within the model.
Making use of the American incidence data for all
Table 3. Total health and social care expenditure related to IDDM,
by age-group (f millions 1992)
zyxwvutsrq
Indirect Costs
Age
group
0-24
2544
45-64
65+
Total
1072
Population
with IDDM
1227
36443
24215
1695
93 581
Total costs
of insulin
maintenance,
excluding
out-patient
attendances
Hospitalization
costs
7.7
9.0
6.0
0.4
23.1
8.9
6.3
5.4
0.5
21.1
General
practitioner
consultation
costs
Out-patient
consultation
costs
0.6
0.2
0.2
0.1
1.1
4.4
4.9
3.2
0.2
12.8
Cost of social
security
non-transfer
payments
Cost of renal
replacement
therapy
1.7
3 .0
5.4
0.9
1 1 .o
8.5
7.5
6.2
4.2
26.5
Total
cost
Total cost
per patient
with IDDM
(fs)
31.8
31.1
26.4
6.2
95.6
1019
853
1091
3686
1021
zyxw
A. GRAY ET AL.
Drn
zyxw
COMMENT
Table 4. Indirect costs associated with IDDM
zyxw
zyxwv
zy
Age
group
(yr)
Annual
deaths from
IDDM
Remaining
working
years
Average
economic
activity rate
(1990)
Average
unemployment
rate
(1 990)
Average annual
earnings,
adjusted for
activity and
unemployment
rates
Discounted
annual lost
earnings (f)
Discounted
total lost
earnings
(f millions 1992)
0-4
45-49
50-54
55-59
60-64
65-69
70-74
75-79
19
5
12
39
41
42
51
72
119
198
307
401
405
266
36
0
47
47
47
47
42
37
32
27
22
17
12
7
2
0
0
0
0.635
0.635
0.635
0.635
0.79
0.785
0.785
0.785
0.785
0.732
0.732
0.668
0.546
6.8
6.8
6.8
6.8
6.2
6.2
5.5
5.5
5.3
5.3
6.0
6.0
6.0
7650
7650
7650
7650
9577
951 7
9588
9588
9608
8959
8893
81 16
6633
49 755
66 584
89 104
119241
145811
140 247
135 035
126 660
115697
93 870
74 559
45 305
12162
0.9
0.3
1.1
4.6
6.0
5.9
6.8
9.1
13.8
18.6
22.9
18.2
4.9
Total
201 3
5-9
10-14
15-1 9
20-24
25-29
30-34
35-39
40-44
113.3
Table 5. Sensitivity analyses of main assumptions used in study on direct costs
Assumption
Baseline
assumption
Population
with
IDDM
Annual
hospitalizations
Total direct
costs
(f millions 1992)
93 581
19612
95.6
102.4
85.4
Baseline
-
5-fold excess IDDM mortality risk
7-fold
100934
20 764
12-fold excess IDDM mortality risk
7-fold
81 535
17 694
IDDM incidence at lower 95% CI
IDDM incidence at higher 95% CI
Rochester all-ages IDDM incidence data
m idpoin t
68 956
11 7861
92 853
14 382
24 761
17 086
113.5
98.4
midpoint
Oxford incidence
data
77.4
IDDM hospitalization risk no different to all
diabetic population
2-fold excess for
ophthalmic and
renal
complications
93 581
17 848
93.1
English average length of stay 20 YO above US
figure
no difference
93 581
19612
98.9
4 general practitioner consultations per
hospitalization
3
93 581
19612
95.9
3 Out-patient consultations per hospitalization
IDDM = 5 YO of new dialysis cases
1
10 Yo
10 Yo
7 years
7 years
3 x average
93 581
19612
97.3
93 581
19612
82.3
93 581
93 581
93 581
19612
19612
108.9
89.1
19612
101.4
93 581
19612
88.3
93 581
19612
102.9
zyxwvutsrqp
IDDM = 15 YO of new dialysis cases
Average duration of dialysis = 5 years
Average duration of dialysis = 9 years
Likelihood of taking up benefits same as
population average
Likelihood of taking up benefits 5 times
population average
COSTS OF IDDM IN ENGLAND AND WALES
3 x average
1073
COMMENT
zyxw
zyxwvutsrq
zyxwvutsrqp
age groups reported in Melton etal.,I2 the total population
with IDDM is very similar to that estimated using the
Oxford incidence data, at 92 853 compared to 93 581 :
this is because the reported incidence rates among
children and adolescents in the American survey are
substantially lower than in the Oxford study, offsetting
almost exactly the additional cases arising from adult
incidence rates. The total annual cost of I D D M using
the American incidence data rises by 3 % to €98 million,
the increase being due mainly to the older age distribution
and hence higher health care costs of the population
with IDDM which the American incidence data generates.
Assuming no differential between the IDDM and NIDDM
populations in hospitalization risk for any complication
of diabetes, the total cost falls to €93 million per annum.
Altering the assumptions concerning length of stay,
GP consultations and out-patient consultations produces
relatively small changes in the total cost, which then
varies between f96 million and €99 million per annum.
However, the total cost is much more sensitive to the
values used for the numbers on dialysis and the average
duration of dialysis: altering the baseline assumption that
10 YO of all new dialysis patients have IDDM to 5 YO and
15 Yo (in effect, halving or increasing by 50 Yo the
number of patients with I D D M receiving dialysis) results
in total costs respectively falling to €82 million or rising
to €109 million. Similarly, reducing or increasing the
average duration of dialysis by 2 years alters the total
cost to €89 million and €101 million, respectively.
Finally, altering the assumption that people with I D D M
are three times as likely as the population as a whole
to receive the three social security benefits included in
the analysis also alters the costs substantially: from €88
million if there i s no difference between people with
IDDM and the population as a whole, to €103 million
if the likelihood increases to five times that of the
general population.
Discussion and Conclusions
This study has estimated that the total cost of illness
associated with I D D M is f96 million annually. Using
sensitivity analysis, the maximum range around this
estimate is from €77 million to €1 13 million. The results
are most sensitive to the assumptions concerning the
incidence of IDDM.
Table 6 places these results within the context of a
number of previous cost of illness studies. These studies
refer to different base years, but the reported costs are
all recalculated in the table in 1992 prices to improve
comparability. The greatly differing financial burden
associated with different disease categories is clear. As
Table 6 also shows, previous cost of illness studies have
focused on NHS hospital and primary care. It has been
relatively uncommon to incorporate community care,
formal care from non-NHS sources such as local authorities, private and voluntary sectors, or informal care
provided by friends and relatives. The table shows that
1074
DTT7
some diseases such as Alzheimer's disease and stroke
are major users of health and social resources. The
resource implications of IDDM do not compare with
these major diseases, but are nevertheless significant,
exceeding a number of other diseases and health
problems such as multiple sclerosis, migraine, and benign
prostatic hyperplasia.
In addition to these direct costs of IDDM, the premature
mortality associated with the disease gives rise to indirect
costs, that is, productive losses measured in terms of
likely earnings, of approximately €1 13 million per annum.
Few British estimates exist of indirect costs associated
with other diseases: as Table 6 shows, comparable losses
from benign prostatic hyperplasia have been estimated
at between €3 million and €14 million per annum.
The baseline estimate of the direct burden associated
with IDDM i s equivalent to around 15 YO of the total
burden which at least one study has estimated for all
d i a b e t e ~ .Thus
~
the financial burden of I D D M appears
to be slightly lower than the crude prevalence of the
disease might indicate: our baseline estimate suggests
that I D D M accounts for approximately 19 OO/ of the
total population with diabetes. This discrepancy arises
primarily because the population with NIDDM is on
average much older, and it is in these older age groups
that the heaviest health care costs tend to be incurred.
This younger age composition of the population with
I D D M compared with those with NIDDM may also
explain why in our study the single most expensive area
of service provision was found to be renal replacement
therapy (accounting for almost 28 YOof total costs) rather
than cardiovascular complications, which in American
studies of the total population with diabetes have been
by far the most costly c ~ m p l i c a t i o n . 'In
~ our study, all
vascular complications account for only 5 O/O of total costs.
There are a number of ways in which the analysis could
be refined, for example, by measuring G P consultations
independently of hospitalizations, using age-specific
excess risk ratios, and estimating less crudely the takeup of social security benefits. We would also like to
explore ways of extending the analysis into the nursing
home sector. Despite these possible refinements, the
methodology used in this study produces results which
are reasonably robust with respect to the assumptions
made, and also allows the effects of alternative assumptions to be considered.
It should be noted that the direct costs to the health
sector identified in this study refer only to patients with
I D D M who have complications of diabetes which are
being treated. There is substantial evidence that people
with diabetes who have end-stage renal disease have in
the past been less likely than people who do not have
diabetes to receive renal replacement therapy, and
various estimates have been made of the need for and
cost of additional treatment f a ~ i l i t i e s . ~It~should
, ~ ~ also
be stressed that questions about appropriate levels of
expenditure cannot be answered by cost of illness studies,
which indicate only what the cost is, not whether it is
zyx
zyxw
zyx
A. GRAY ET AL.
z
zyxwvu
COMMENT
Table 6. The estimated total cost of a range of diseases, England and Wales, in 1992 f s
NHS hospital
care
Disease group
-~
General
practitioner
care
Community
and non-NHS
care
Total direct
costs
lndirect
costs
Total direct
and indirect
costs
81 9
n.i."
143
n.1.
34.1
n.1.
11
n.i.
1101
838
660
138
96
70-92
36
27
n.i.
1101
838
660
138
209
74-1 09
36
27
~
Alzheimer's disease
Stroke
Diabetes
Epilepsy
IDDM
Benign prostatic hyperplasia
Multiple sclerosis
Migraine
2 78
81 8
446
106
60.4
61-80
20
3
4
20
71
32
1.1
9-1 2
5
24
n.i.
n.i.
n.i.
113
4-1 7
n.i.
n.i.
'n.i., not included in study.
too low or too high. Answers to such questions demand
information on the costs and effectiveness of particular
treatment^.^^ Such cost-effectiveness analyses, however,
may be facilitated and encouraged by cost of illness
studies. The present study also provides pertinent background information for those interested in IDDM, which
remains an important health problem touching on many
different aspects of the health and social service sectors,
as well as on the lives of individuals and of society as
a whole.
11
12
13
McPherson CK. Economic burden of treated benign
prostatic hyperplasia in the United Kingdom. Br j Urol
1993; 71: 290--296.
Bingley P, Gale E. Incidence of insulin dependent diabetes
in England: a study in the Oxford region. Br M e d J 1989;
298: 558-560.
Melton LJ, Palumbo PJ, Chu C-P. Incidence of diabetes
mellitus by clinical type. Diabetes Care 1983; 6: 75-86.
Dorman, IS, Laporte RE, Kuller LH, Cruikshanks KJ,
Orchard TJ, Wagener DK, et a/.. The Pittsburgh InsulinDependent Diabetes Mellitus (IDDM)Morbidity and Mortality Study: mortality results. Diabetes 1984; 33: 271-276.
American Diabetes Association. Diabetes: 1991 Vital
Statistics. Alexandria, Virginia: ADA, 1991.
Lloyd C, Orchard T. The prevelance of complications in
IDDM in the U S . Practicaf Diabetes 1991; 9: 171-173.
Alberti K, DeFronzo R, Keen H, Zimmet P, eds. lnfernational
Textbook o f Diabetes Mellitus. Chichester: John Wiley,
zyxwvutsrqp
14
15
Acknowledgements
Earlier versions of this paper were presented to a seminar
at the University of Oxford Nuffield Department of
Clinical Medicine, and to an IBC Diabetic Medicine
conference. We are grateful to participants at both events,
and to two anonymous referees for a number of
constructive comments. Amylin Europe Ltd provided
material support for the study.
References
16
1992.
17 Neil HAW, Mather HM, Thompson AV, Thorogood GH,
Hill RD, Mann JI. The Oxford Community Diabetes Study:
18
19
Evidence for an increase in the prevalence of known
diabetes in Great Britain. Diabetic M e d 1987; 4: 539-543.
Neil HAW, Gatling W, Mather HM, Thompson AV,
Thorogood M, Fowler GH, eta/. Diabetes in the elderly:
the Oxford community diabetes study. Diabetic M e d 1987;
4: 539-543.
American Diabetic Association. Direct and lndirect Costs
of Diabetes in the United States in 1987. Alexandria,
Virginia: ADA, 1989.
Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development
(OECD). Health Data File. Paris: OECD.
Joint Working Party on Diabetic Renal Failure of the
British Diabetic Association, Renal Association, and the
Research Unit of the Royal College of Physicians. Treatment
of and mortality from diabetic renal failure in patients
identified in the 7985 United Kingdom survey. Br M e d J
1989; 299: 1 135-1 136.
European Dialysis and Transplantation Association. Combined Report OR Regular Dialysis and Transplantation in
Europe, Vol. XX. London: EDTA, 1989.
Beech R, Gulliford M, Mays N, Melia J. Epidemiologically
Based Needs Assessment: Renal Disease. London: Department of Health, 1992.
Wood IT, Mallick NP, Wing AJ. Prediction of resources
needed to achieve the national target for treatment of
renal failure. Br M e d J 1987; 294: 1467-1470.
Department of Health. Health and Personal Social Service
Statistics 1989. London: HMSO, 1989.
zyxwvutsrqp
zyxwvutsrq
zyxwvutsrqpon
1 Laing W. The cost of diet-related disease. In: Turner M,
ed. Preventative Nutrition and Society. London: Academic
Press, 1981.
2 Gerard K, Donaldson C, Maynard A. The cost of diabetes.
Diabetic M e d 1989; 6: 164-1 67.
3 Laing W, Williams R. Diabetes: A Model for Health Care
Management. London: Office of Health Economics, 1989.
4 Black D, Pole JD. Priorities in biomedical research: indices
of burden. Br J Prev Soc M e d 1975; 29: 222-227
5 Gray AM, Fenn PF. Alzheimer's disease: the burden of
the illness in England. Health Trends 1993; 25: 31-37.
6 Griffin J, Wyles, M. Epilepsy: Towards Tomorrow. London:
Office of Health Economics, 1991.
7 Blau IN, Drummond MF. Migraine. London: Office of
Health Economics, 1991.
8 O'Brien B. Multiple Sclerosis. London: Office of Health
Economics, 1987.
9 Dale S. Stroke. London: Office of Health Economics, 1989.
10 Drumrnond MF, McGuire A], Black NA, Pettigrew M,
COSTS OF IDDM IN ENGLAND AND WALES
20
21
22
23
24
25
1075
COMMENT
zyxw
zyxwvutsrqp
zyxwv
zyxwvutsrq
Department of Health. The Government’s Expenditure
Plans 1992-93 to 1994-95. Cmd 1913. London: HMSO,
1992.
27 West R. Organ Transplantation. London: Office of Health
Economics, 1991.
28 Green H. Informal Carers. General Household Survey,
1985. London: HMSO, 1988.
29 Glendenning C. The Costs of Informal Care: Looking
Inside the Household. London: HMSO, 1992.
30 Office of Population Censuses and Surveys. Social Trends
1993. London: HMSO, 1993.
31 Panzram G. Epidemiological data on excess mortality and
26
1076
32
33
life expectancy in IDDM-a critical review. Exp C/in
Endocrinol 1984; 83: 93-1 00.
Feest TG, Mistry CD, Grimes DS, Mallick NP. Incidence
of advanced chronic renal failure and the need for end
stage renal replacement treatment. Br Med 1 1990; 301 :
897-900.
Diabetes Control and Complications Research Group
(DCCT).The effects of intensive treatment of diabetes on the
development and progression of long-term complications in
insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. New Engl 1 Med
1993: 329: 977-986.
zyx
A. GRAY E l AL.