Expert outreach: Difference between revisions

From Wikimedia UK
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m (Qemu25 moved page Expert outreach to WOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOKIOAOAK: Moved at request of Miley Cyrus)
m (Reverted edits by 173.87.168.86 (talk) to last revision by MartinPoulter)
Tag: Rollback
 
(26 intermediate revisions by 12 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
'''We are working with scientists, scholars, learned societies and funders to help experts improve Wikipedia and its sister projects, bringing that expertise to the widest possible public.'''  
__NOTOC__
'''We are working with scientists, scholars, learned societies and funders to help experts improve Wikipedia and its sister projects, bringing that expertise to the widest possible public.''' This work complements WMUK's [[Cultural partnerships|partnerships with galleries, libraries, archives and museums]] as well as its [[Education projects|support for higher education]].


Many scholarly societies are, like Wikimedia UK, registered charities whose mission includes informing and educating the general public. These common goals are advanced with internal training events, publications and public events. This work complements WMUK's [[Cultural partnerships|partnerships with galleries, libraries, archives and museums]] as well as its [[Education projects|support for higher education]].
<div style="max-width:31em;float:left;margin:0 3em 2em 0">
{| style="border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;margin:0 auto 1em auto"
{{Header blue|Guidance|margin-bottom: 0;}}
|-
We are developing guidance for researchers and public engagement professionals on how Wikimedia can magnify the impact of their work.
| [[File:Stigmaphyllon_flower_-_rspb.2013.0960-F1.large-centre.jpeg|60px]]
| [[File:Anon. - Vita, dulcedo, et spes nostra, salve. (BL R.M.24.c.9 f. 2r).jpg|100px]]
| [[File:White_Matter_Connections_Obtained_with_MRI_Tractography.png|92px]]
| [[File:Boat and bed - British Library Royal MS 15 E vi f273r (detail).jpg|140px]]
|-
| colspan=5 style="text-align:center" | Researchers are sharing many thousands of freely licensed images and media through [[commons:Main_Page|Wikimedia Commons]].
|}
 
<div>
<div style="width:48%;margin:0 2% 0 0;float:left">
==Brochures==
We are preparing print brochures to show researchers and public engagement professionals how Wikimedia can magnify the impact of their work. Improvements and suggestions are welcome.
* [[Wikimedia as a public engagement tool for scientists]]
* [[Wikimedia as a public engagement tool for scientists]]
* [[Wikimedia as a public engagement tool for the arts and humanities]]
* [[Wikimedia as a public engagement tool for the arts and humanities]]
==Frequently Asked Questions==
 
A separate page answers [[Frequently Asked Questions for expert contributors|questions we have been asked by potential expert contributors]].
A separate page answers [[Frequently Asked Questions for expert contributors|questions we have been asked by potential expert contributors]].
[[File:Ten Simple Rules for Editing Wikipedia.pdf|thumb|110px|right]]
* [http://www.ploscompbiol.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000941 A guide for expert contributors to Wikipedia published in ''PLoS Computational Biology''] by a group of Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute scientists (and Wikimedia UK volunteers)
* [http://physicsworld.com/cws/article/indepth/47019 Feature article for the ''Physics World'' magazine and site] (free registration required) by Martin Poulter and Mike Peel


==Joint projects==
* From July 2013 to March 2014, Jisc and Wikimedia UK are [[Expert outreach/Jisc Ambassador|jointly supporting a project]] to encourage a range of audiences (librarians, teachers, researchers and students) within learning and research to engage with Wikimedia UK and Wikimedia projects. This includes [[Expert outreach/Jisc Ambassador/Research impact and open education|a programme of workshops in institutions]] on "Wikimedia: linking research impact and open education". Follow the links for more details.
* The Arts and Humanities Research Council funded {{w|Wikipedia:GLAM/British_Library|a Wikipedian in Residence at the British Library}} for one year. Among other activities, this provided {{w|Wikipedia:GLAM/BL/Events|workshops for researchers and postgraduates}} in universities and research centres.
* In the Summer of 2011, Wikimedia UK [[ARKive project|collaborated with the charity Wildscreen]] to improve Wikipedia's articles on threatened species. This involved using some of the text content from Wildscreen's {{w|ARKive project}} on Wikipedia. You can still help the project by improving target articles: see the {{w|GLAM/ARKive|project page}}.


==Publications==
{{Header blue|Wikipedians in Residence|margin-bottom: 0;}}
* [http://www.ploscompbiol.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000941 A guide for expert contributors to Wikipedia published in ''PLoS Computational Biology''] by a group of Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute scientists (and Wikimedia UK volunteers)
[[File:Wikipedians_in_Residence_at_GLAMcamp_London.JPG|120px|right]]
* [http://physicsworld.com/cws/article/indepth/47019 Feature article for the ''Physics World'' magazine and site] (free registration required) by Martin Poulter and Mike Peel
The Royal Society, the Wellcome Trust, and the Arts & Humanities Research Council are among the bodies that have [[Cultural_partnerships#Wikimedians_in_Residence|employed Wikipedians in the UK]]. Proposals are welcomed from scholarly and cultural institutions.


==Workshops and editathons==
[[File:Jisc logo.png|right]]
===Humanities===
From July 2013 to April 2014, Jisc and Wikimedia UK are [[Expert outreach/Jisc Ambassador|jointly supporting a project]] to encourage a range of audiences (librarians, teachers, researchers and students) within learning and research to engage with Wikimedia UK and Wikimedia projects. This includes [[Expert outreach/Jisc Ambassador/Research impact and open education|a programme of workshops in institutions]] on "Wikimedia: linking research impact and open education". Follow the links for more details.
;Jisc/ The British Library
* [[World War I/World War I Editathon|World War I editathon]]


===Medicine and biosciences===
;Medical Research Council
*[[Medical Research Council Workshop|Training workshops for MRC staff and MRC-funded projects]]
*[[MRC, Royal_Society, Wikimedia UK Women in Science Wikipedia edit-a-thons|Women in Science editathons with the Royal Society]]
;Cancer Research UK
*[[Cancer Research UK Workshop|Two training workshops]]
;Parkinson's UK
*[[Parkinson%27s_UK_Wikipedia_training|Training workshop]]
;European young researchers network/ Sphingonet
*[[European_young_researchers_network_Wikipedia_workshop|Editing workshop on Sphingolipids]]
;University Hospitals Coventry & Warwickshire NHS Trust
*[[:wikipedia:Wikipedia:WikiProject Medicine/Editor outreach/UK 2012|WikiProject Medicine editor outreach event]] with Wikimedia Canada
;Ludwig Institute for Cancer Research
*[[Ludwig Institute for Cancer Research Wikipedia training 2012|Training workshop]]
;University of Oxford Department of Zoology
*[[University of Oxford Department of Zoology Wikipedia training 2012|Training workshop]]


===Physical sciences===
{{Header blue|Events and training|margin-bottom: 0;}}
;The Geological Society
Our [[:Category:Expert Outreach|Expert outreach events]] cover a wide range of academic subjects and partner organisations, including universities, scholarly societies and charities.
*[[Geological Society workshop|Training workshop (with members of the Royal Society of Chemistry)]]
;The Institute of Physics
*[[Institute of Physics Workshop|Training workshop]]
;The Royal Society
*[[Ada_Lovelace_Day_2012|Ada Lovelace Day editathon]]
*[[MRC,_Royal_Society,_Wikimedia_UK_Women_in_Science_Wikipedia_edit-a-thons|Women in Science editathons with the MRC]]


===Social sciences===
Please [[Contact us|contact Wikimedia UK]] if you would like to run a joint event or if you want a speaker or a guest article.
;British Psychological Society
*[[British Psychological Society workshop|Presentation/ training workshop at BPS conference]]


==Presentations and conference sessions==
;Office for National Statistics
* [[ONS_Presentation|Presentation by John Cummings]]
;Institution of Civil Engineers
* [http://blog.pwcom.co.uk/2012/04/11/wikipedia-and-the-ice/ Talk by Andy Mabbett]
; [http://www2.le.ac.uk/departments/media/research/research-groups/ideograms-research-group IDEoGRAMS group], University of Leicester
*Seminar on "Wikipedia: Elitism for the Masses" by Martin Poulter
; Theoretical Archaeology Group
*Andy Mabbett presented on [http://centraltag.wordpress.com/call-for-papers/dr-web-love-or-how-i-learnt-to-stop-worrying-love-social-media/ a meeting of the "how archaeologists can use Wikipedia to disseminate their work to both specialist & popular audiences"]
; Biology Online Media Group (BOMG)
* Martin Poulter presented at this Social Media Lunch for scholarly societies
;International Institute for Environment and Development
* [http://www.iied.org/general/events/why-wikipedia-matters-you-yes-you-24-november-10-11am Presentation by Darren Logan]
; ESRC seminar on "Digital Policy, Connectivity, Creativity and Rights"
* [http://blog.wikimedia.org.uk/2011/11/sausages-and-scholarship-wikipedia-and-digital-literacy/ Presentation on digital literacy by Martin Poulter]
;Library Camp UK
*[http://libcampuk11.wikispaces.com/Session+notes#x-Session:%20Wikipedia,%20Creative%20Commons%20and%20QRpedia  Sessions by Andy Mabbett]
; Science Online London (SOLO11) conference
* [http://www.scienceonlinelondon.org/programme.html Two sessions by Mike Peel]
; Investigating Academic Impact conference
* [http://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences/presentations/ Panel appearance by Mike Peel]
;Charted Institute of Librarians and Information Professionals (CILIP)
* [[CILIP_July_2011_report|Conference stall]] run by Oliver Keyes, Tom Morris and Kim Bruning


{{Header blue|Call for volunteers|margin-bottom: 0;}}
Wikimedia UK is seeking volunteers to give introductory talks, promote Wikimedia at conferences or deliver training. We can support travel and subsistence, and we can provide handouts and freebies to distribute. Drop a message to daria.cybulska[[Image:At_sign.svg|15px|@]]wikimedia.org.uk stating your username on Wikimedia projects, where you can travel to and any relevant background.
<gallery mode=packed>
File:Stigmaphyllon_flower_-_rspb.2013.0960-F1.large-centre.jpeg
File:Anon. - Vita, dulcedo, et spes nostra, salve. (BL R.M.24.c.9 f. 2r).jpg
File:White_Matter_Connections_Obtained_with_MRI_Tractography.png
</gallery>
</div>
</div>
<div style="width:48%;float:left;background:#f5faff; border-radius: .4em; -moz-border-radius: .4em; -webkit-border-radius: .4em; font-size:120%; border:1px solid #afa3bf; color:#000; padding:0.2em 0.4em" class="quotepanel">
<div style="max-width:31em;float:left;margin:0 0 2em 0">
<blockquote>"If you're serious about ensuring public engagement in your research then you need to make damn sure your work can be incorporated into Wikipedia. Wikipedia is the most important engagement channel for your research."
{{Header blue|Expert views|margin-bottom: 0;}}
<div style="font-size:smaller;margin-top:0.2em" class="attribution">—{{w|Cameron Neylon}} (Public Library of Science) [[:File:Wikimedia_UK_2012-13_annual_review_web_version.pdf|"Wikimedia UK Annual Review 2012-13"]]</div></blockquote>
"If you're serious about ensuring public engagement in your research then you need to make damn sure your work can be incorporated into Wikipedia. Wikipedia is the most important engagement channel for your research."
 
<div style="font-size:smaller;margin-top:0.2em" class="attribution">—{{w|Cameron Neylon}} (Public Library of Science) [[:File:Wikimedia_UK_2012-13_annual_review_web_version.pdf|"Wikimedia UK Annual Review 2012-13"]]</div>
<blockquote>"Wikipedia is an illustration of the way that academic work needs to change to benefit from a more educated public, a more networked world, in an age of information abundance. 21st-century scholars should be working with it, not against it."<div style="font-size:smaller;margin-top:0.2em" class="attribution">—[http://fragmentsofamber.wordpress.com/ Amber Thomas] (Jisc) ''Ariadne'', November 2012 [http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue70/thomas "21st-century Scholarship and Wikipedia"]</div>
</blockquote>


"Wikipedia is an illustration of the way that academic work needs to change to benefit from a more educated public, a more networked world, in an age of information abundance. 21st-century scholars should be working with it, not against it."<div style="font-size:smaller;margin-top:0.2em" class="attribution">—[http://fragmentsofamber.wordpress.com/ Amber Thomas] (Jisc) ''Ariadne'', November 2012 [http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue70/thomas "21st-century Scholarship and Wikipedia"]</div>
{| style="border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;margin:0 auto 1em auto"
{| style="border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;margin:0 auto 1em auto"
|-
|-
Line 103: Line 49:
| [[File:PSM_V52_D494_Frequency_of_suicide_in_England_1872_1876.png|80px]]
| [[File:PSM_V52_D494_Frequency_of_suicide_in_England_1872_1876.png|80px]]
|}
|}
<blockquote>"One of the most rewarding aspects can be in helping shape the public image of their field, say contributors. For many subjects – including scholarly topics – it is very often Wikipedia pages that are the top hits on Google, and for scholars who want their field represented accurately or interestingly, contributing to Wikipedia can help."
<div style="font-size:smaller;margin-top:0.2em" class="attribution">—Zoe Corbyn, ''The Guardian'', Tuesday 29 March 2011 [http://www.guardian.co.uk/education/2011/mar/29/wikipedia-survey-academic-contributions "Wikipedia wants more contributions from academics"]</div></blockquote>


<blockquote>"The key challenge for the scholarly community [...] is to work actively with Wikipedia to strengthen its role in 'pre-research.' We need to build stronger links from its entries to more advanced resources that have been created and maintained by the academy."
"It is our hope [to] encourage other scholars to refine and improve Wikipedia articles so they might become the world’s most accurate and trusted reference, in addition to the most well read. Freely open and accessible, Wikipedia can improve clinical care at the bedside for physicians around the world by allowing them access to the latest information, regardless of their ability to pay high fees."
<div style="font-size:smaller;margin-top:0.2em" class="attribution">—Casper Grathwohl, Oxford University Press, ''The Chronicle of Higher Education'', 7 January 2011 [http://chronicle.com/article/article-content/125899/ "Wikipedia Comes of Age"]</div></blockquote>
<div style="font-size:smaller;margin-top:0.2em" class="attribution">— James Maskalyk, ''Open Medicine'', October 2014 [http://www.openmedicine.ca/article/view/652/565 "Modern Medicine Comes Online"]</div>
 
"Wikipedia's user-friendly global reach offers an unprecedented opportunity for public engagement with science. Scientists who receive public or charitable funding should therefore seize the opportunity to make sure that Wikipedia articles are understandable, scientifically accurate, well sourced and up-to-date."
<div style="font-size:smaller;margin-top:0.2em" class="attribution">—Alex Bateman and Darren Logan (Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute), ''Nature'', 9 December 2010 [http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v468/n7325/full/468765c.html "Time to underpin Wikipedia wisdom"]</div>
 
"The key challenge for the scholarly community [...] is to work actively with Wikipedia to strengthen its role in 'pre-research.' We need to build stronger links from its entries to more advanced resources that have been created and maintained by the academy."
<div style="font-size:smaller;margin-top:0.2em" class="attribution">—Casper Grathwohl, Oxford University Press, ''The Chronicle of Higher Education'', 7 January 2011 [http://chronicle.com/article/article-content/125899/ "Wikipedia Comes of Age"]</div>


{| style="border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;margin:0 auto 1em auto"
{| style="border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;margin:0 auto 1em auto"
Line 115: Line 65:
| [[File:Bacon_Great_Instauration_frontispiece.jpg|55px]]
| [[File:Bacon_Great_Instauration_frontispiece.jpg|55px]]
|}
|}
<blockquote>"I request that the public fund my research through their tax and charitable contributions; in return I consider it my responsibility to provide them with accurate, up-to-date and free access to the scientific progress they pay for."
<div style="font-size:smaller;margin-top:0.2em" class="attribution">—Darren Logan (Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute), ''Wellcome Trust Blog'', 18 May 2011 [http://wellcometrust.wordpress.com/2011/05/18/being-a-scientist-in-the-age-of-wikipedia/ "Being a scientist in the age of Wikipedia"]</div></blockquote>


<blockquote>"Perhaps other academic societies and professional bodies can contribute to upgrading and extending Wikipedia entries. [...] [T]he advent of several geoscientific Wikipedians would greatly enhance Wikipedia's geological coverage, to the benefit of all."
"I think everyone in principle would like to see more integration of Wikipedia and university History, as a way of bringing academic research out of the ivory tower and into public attention, and equipping our students for the digital world."  
<div style="font-size:smaller;margin-top:0.2em" class="attribution">—Brian Whalley (University of Sheffield) ''Ariadne'', July 2012 [http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue69/whalley "Wikipedia: Reflections on Use and Acceptance in Academic Environments"]</div></blockquote>
<div style="font-size:smaller;margin-top:0.2em" class="attribution">-Charles West (University of Sheffield), May 2018 [https://blog.wikimedia.org.uk/2018/05/wikipedia-in-the-history-classroom/ "Wikipedia in the History Classroom"]</div>


{| style="border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;margin:0 auto 1em auto"
"Perhaps other academic societies and professional bodies can contribute to upgrading and extending Wikipedia entries. [...] [T]he advent of several geoscientific Wikipedians would greatly enhance Wikipedia's geological coverage, to the benefit of all."
|-
<div style="font-size:smaller;margin-top:0.2em" class="attribution">—Brian Whalley (University of Sheffield) ''Ariadne'', July 2012 [http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue69/whalley "Wikipedia: Reflections on Use and Acceptance in Academic Environments"]</div>
| [[File:Brain-disease-gyrification.png|250px]]
|}
<blockquote>"Wikipedia's user-friendly global reach offers an unprecedented opportunity for public engagement with science. Scientists who receive public or charitable funding should therefore seize the opportunity to make sure that Wikipedia articles are understandable, scientifically accurate, well sourced and up-to-date."
<div style="font-size:smaller;margin-top:0.2em" class="attribution">—Alex Bateman and Darren Logan (Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute), ''Nature'', 9 December 2010 [http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v468/n7325/full/468765c.html "Time to underpin Wikipedia wisdom"]</div></blockquote>


<blockquote>"Dear Wikipedia, I want to thank you and to compliment you on your service. I often use it, especially also for technical information in physics and astronomy. Just now I was impressed by the density of information in {{w|Quantum_chromodynamics|your article on QCD}}, the theory of the strong interaction, in particular, its history."
"Wikipedia is one of the great and lasting achievements of this century and typifies the Digital Enlightenment. It epitomises so much – cooperation, democracy, meritocracy, innovation, challenge to authority. It represents the dream of the [[:w:Encyclop%C3%A9die|Encyclopédie]] of [[:w:Denis Diderot|Denis Diderot]] and [[:w:Jean_le_Rond_d%27Alembert|Jean le Rond d’Alembert]]. [...] When the cultural history of this century is written, Wikipedia will have the same place as the Encyclopédie."
<div style="font-size:smaller;margin-top:0.2em" class="attribution">—{{w|Jack Steinberger}}, 1988 Physics Nobel Laureate, 9 September 2010</div></blockquote>
<div style="font-size:smaller;margin-top:0.2em" class="attribution">—Peter Murray-Rust (University of Cambridge) [http://blog.wikimedia.org.uk/2014/03/wikipedia-and-the-digital-enlightenment/ Blog post], March 2014</div>


{| style="border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;margin:0 auto 1em auto"
{| style="border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;margin:0 auto 1em auto"
Line 137: Line 81:
| [[File:First neutrino observation.jpg|90px]]
| [[File:First neutrino observation.jpg|90px]]
|}
|}
"Dear Wikipedia, I want to thank you and to compliment you on your service. I often use it, especially also for technical information in physics and astronomy. Just now I was impressed by the density of information in {{w|Quantum_chromodynamics|your article on QCD}}, the theory of the strong interaction, in particular, its history."
<div style="font-size:smaller;margin-top:0.2em" class="attribution">—{{w|Jack Steinberger}}, 1988 Physics Nobel Laureate, 9 September 2010</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<div style="clear:both">
{{clear}}
The images on this page have been shared on Wikimedia Commons by academics, libraries and journals. Click on an image to see the source and copyright information.


==Get in touch==
Please [[Contact us|contact Wikimedia UK]] if you would like to run a joint event or if you want a speaker or a guest article.


==Call for volunteers==
Wikimedia UK is seeking volunteers to give introductory talks, promote Wikimedia at conferences or deliver training. We can support travel and subsistence, and we can provide handouts and freebies to distribute. Drop a message to daria.cybulska[[Image:At_sign.svg|15px|@]]wikimedia.org.uk stating your username on Wikimedia projects, where you can travel to and any relevant background.
</div>
[[Category:Expert Outreach]]
[[Category:Expert Outreach]]

Latest revision as of 09:16, 11 August 2022

We are working with scientists, scholars, learned societies and funders to help experts improve Wikipedia and its sister projects, bringing that expertise to the widest possible public. This work complements WMUK's partnerships with galleries, libraries, archives and museums as well as its support for higher education.

Guidance

We are developing guidance for researchers and public engagement professionals on how Wikimedia can magnify the impact of their work.

A separate page answers questions we have been asked by potential expert contributors.

Ten Simple Rules for Editing Wikipedia.pdf


Wikipedians in Residence
Wikipedians in Residence at GLAMcamp London.JPG

The Royal Society, the Wellcome Trust, and the Arts & Humanities Research Council are among the bodies that have employed Wikipedians in the UK. Proposals are welcomed from scholarly and cultural institutions.

Jisc logo.png

From July 2013 to April 2014, Jisc and Wikimedia UK are jointly supporting a project to encourage a range of audiences (librarians, teachers, researchers and students) within learning and research to engage with Wikimedia UK and Wikimedia projects. This includes a programme of workshops in institutions on "Wikimedia: linking research impact and open education". Follow the links for more details.


Events and training

Our Expert outreach events cover a wide range of academic subjects and partner organisations, including universities, scholarly societies and charities.

Please contact Wikimedia UK if you would like to run a joint event or if you want a speaker or a guest article.


Call for volunteers

Wikimedia UK is seeking volunteers to give introductory talks, promote Wikimedia at conferences or deliver training. We can support travel and subsistence, and we can provide handouts and freebies to distribute. Drop a message to daria.cybulska@wikimedia.org.uk stating your username on Wikimedia projects, where you can travel to and any relevant background.

Expert views

"If you're serious about ensuring public engagement in your research then you need to make damn sure your work can be incorporated into Wikipedia. Wikipedia is the most important engagement channel for your research."

"Wikipedia is an illustration of the way that academic work needs to change to benefit from a more educated public, a more networked world, in an age of information abundance. 21st-century scholars should be working with it, not against it."
Forest of synthetic pyramidal dendrites grown using Cajal's laws of neuronal branching.png Decomposing systems into overlapping complexes from Tononi's IITC.png PSM V52 D494 Frequency of suicide in England 1872 1876.png

"It is our hope [to] encourage other scholars to refine and improve Wikipedia articles so they might become the world’s most accurate and trusted reference, in addition to the most well read. Freely open and accessible, Wikipedia can improve clinical care at the bedside for physicians around the world by allowing them access to the latest information, regardless of their ability to pay high fees."

— James Maskalyk, Open Medicine, October 2014 "Modern Medicine Comes Online"

"Wikipedia's user-friendly global reach offers an unprecedented opportunity for public engagement with science. Scientists who receive public or charitable funding should therefore seize the opportunity to make sure that Wikipedia articles are understandable, scientifically accurate, well sourced and up-to-date."

—Alex Bateman and Darren Logan (Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute), Nature, 9 December 2010 "Time to underpin Wikipedia wisdom"

"The key challenge for the scholarly community [...] is to work actively with Wikipedia to strengthen its role in 'pre-research.' We need to build stronger links from its entries to more advanced resources that have been created and maintained by the academy."

—Casper Grathwohl, Oxford University Press, The Chronicle of Higher Education, 7 January 2011 "Wikipedia Comes of Age"
Scotland.central.geological.jpg Britain Before the First World War Q104186.jpg Bacon Great Instauration frontispiece.jpg

"I think everyone in principle would like to see more integration of Wikipedia and university History, as a way of bringing academic research out of the ivory tower and into public attention, and equipping our students for the digital world."

-Charles West (University of Sheffield), May 2018 "Wikipedia in the History Classroom"

"Perhaps other academic societies and professional bodies can contribute to upgrading and extending Wikipedia entries. [...] [T]he advent of several geoscientific Wikipedians would greatly enhance Wikipedia's geological coverage, to the benefit of all."

—Brian Whalley (University of Sheffield) Ariadne, July 2012 "Wikipedia: Reflections on Use and Acceptance in Academic Environments"

"Wikipedia is one of the great and lasting achievements of this century and typifies the Digital Enlightenment. It epitomises so much – cooperation, democracy, meritocracy, innovation, challenge to authority. It represents the dream of the Encyclopédie of Denis Diderot and Jean le Rond d’Alembert. [...] When the cultural history of this century is written, Wikipedia will have the same place as the Encyclopédie."

—Peter Murray-Rust (University of Cambridge) Blog post, March 2014
CMS Higgs-event.jpg SO10.svg First neutrino observation.jpg

"Dear Wikipedia, I want to thank you and to compliment you on your service. I often use it, especially also for technical information in physics and astronomy. Just now I was impressed by the density of information in your article on QCD, the theory of the strong interaction, in particular, its history."

Jack Steinberger, 1988 Physics Nobel Laureate, 9 September 2010

The images on this page have been shared on Wikimedia Commons by academics, libraries and journals. Click on an image to see the source and copyright information.