Tenth Circuit Torts - Injury Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 20,655
Metcalf-McGee v. Walmart Inc.
as 2:2022cv02493
Plaintiff:
Leslie R Metcalf-McGee
Defendant:
Walmart Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
Hamrick v. Two Nines Agri Transport LLC et al
as 5:2022cv01015
Plaintiff:
Mark A Hamrick
Defendant:
Two Nines Agri Transport LLC and Adolfo L Hernandez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Miller v. Cowell
as 6:2022cv01266
Plaintiff:
Mike Miller, Jr.
Defendant:
Gabriel Cowell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Hancock v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company
as 6:2022cv01268
Plaintiff:
Billie Hancock
Defendant:
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Ireland et al v. FCA US LLC
as 2:2022cv00249
Plaintiff:
Brandon Ireland and Meagan Ireland
Defendant:
FCA US LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Carter-Boniface v. Vasco et al
as 6:2022cv01267
Plaintiff:
E. Jean Carter-Boniface
Defendant:
Todd Vasco CEO doing business as Dollar General, Michael Calbert Chair doing business as Dollar General, John W. Garratt and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Saxena v. Hall
as 1:2022cv03060
Plaintiff:
Grant Mitchell Saxena
Defendant:
Mary Louise Hall
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Libel,Assault,Slander
Wright v. Hobby Lobby Stores, Inc.
as 1:2022cv03065
Plaintiff:
Abby Wright
Defendant:
Hobby Lobby Stores, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Bailey v. American Land & Leisure, Inc.
as 1:2022cv03067
Plaintiff:
Valerie Bailey
Defendant:
American Land & Leisure, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Gyallay-Pap v. Coulson
as 1:2022cv03068
Plaintiff:
Kimnath Gyallay-Pap
Defendant:
Vallen Coulson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.