Search for: "mark"
Results 1 - 20
of 112,344
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Dec 2008, 5:07 pm
var addthis_pub="bevans1986";It's not just a trade mark infringement case......it's a Marks and Spencer's trade mark infringement case. [read post]
11 Jun 2014, 8:57 am
A Private Members Bill was introduced in Canada’s federal parliament yesterday, which, if passed, will result in significant amendments to the official mark provisions in the Trade-marks Act. [read post]
30 Sep 2008, 3:49 am
On Sept. 26, the Ninth Circuit found that a mark can be counterfeit even when the genuine mark is not used on the same goods. [read post]
28 Sep 2010, 2:00 am
Under the false marking statute (35 USC 292), a patentee may be liable up to $500 per falsely marked product. [read post]
19 Sep 2006, 2:54 pm
Witness the following marks advertised in the Canadian Trade-marks Journal over the course of the last 3 months. [read post]
29 Dec 2009, 6:08 am
An Order in Council has amended Schedule 2 of the Olympic and Paralympic Marks Act to add 38 new marks to the prohibited marks list. [read post]
14 Sep 2010, 10:05 am
MARK TWAIN, ILLUSTRATED . . . [read post]
16 Aug 2010, 4:25 pm
Section 23(2) of the Act provides that only the owner of a certification mark may authorize others to use the mark in association with wares that meet the defined standard. [read post]
9 Nov 2021, 12:39 am
With apologies to Hamlet--when is a mark a pattern mark? [read post]
14 May 2008, 7:25 pm
Although marking is not required, it’s beneficial because marking serves as constructive notice to the world that the product is patented. [read post]
12 Jul 2009, 9:27 pm
Mitac stylised mio was not identical to the Singtel mark notwithstanding that phonetically the marks are identical. [read post]
28 Jan 2013, 9:17 am
Rather, the marking rules already tell us that the origin for marking purposes is "Canada." [read post]
29 Jan 2010, 2:06 pm
You may also be interested in Patent Marking. [read post]
28 Feb 2010, 5:10 pm
Related Posts: False Marking Lawsuits Forest Group Decision Constitutionality of the False Marking Statute Patent Marking [read post]
4 Oct 2009, 4:45 am
On Friday 30 September 2009 the Court of First Instance decided that two trade mark applications for exclamation mark symbols (as shown on the left) are not distinctive enough to qualify for Community trade mark registration, (cases T-75/08 and T-191/08). [read post]
14 Sep 2018, 8:25 am
The post Best Wishes to Mark Camarigg! [read post]
30 Oct 2013, 11:49 am
Apparently, Smart and Biggar registered a sound mark with the Canadian Trade-Marks Office two decades ago; but thereafter the Office refused to register any further sound marks. [read post]
12 Mar 2020, 4:39 pm
By the time the taxpayer discovers that… Continue reading The Late Mark-to-Market Election The post The Late Mark-to-Market Election appeared first on Houston Tax Attorney, Kreig LLC. [read post]
10 Feb 2010, 7:48 am
We look forward to hearing from Mark about recent developments in IP law. [read post]
22 Apr 2010, 5:39 am
The false marking statute 'requires a fine to be imposed for every offense of marking any unpatented article.' . . . [read post]