Other Sellers on Amazon
+ $3.99 shipping
86% positive over last 12 months
Usually ships within 3 to 4 days.
& FREE Shipping
89% positive over last 12 months
Usually ships within 4 to 5 days.
You’ve got a Kindle.
Download the free Kindle app and start reading Kindle books instantly on your smartphone, tablet, or computer - no Kindle device required. Learn more
Read instantly on your browser with Kindle Cloud Reader.
Using your mobile phone camera - scan the code below and download the Kindle app.
Enter your mobile phone or email address
By pressing "Send link," you agree to Amazon's Conditions of Use.
You consent to receive an automated text message from or on behalf of Amazon about the Kindle App at your mobile number above. Consent is not a condition of any purchase. Message & data rates may apply.
Choosing Your Battles: American Civil-Military Relations and the Use of Force Paperback – September 11, 2005
Price
|
New from | Used from |
Enhance your purchase
America's debate over whether and how to invade Iraq clustered into civilian versus military camps. Top military officials appeared reluctant to use force, the most hawkish voices in government were civilians who had not served in uniform, and everyone was worried that the American public would not tolerate casualties in war. This book shows that this civilian-military argument--which has characterized earlier debates over Bosnia, Somalia, and Kosovo--is typical, not exceptional. Indeed, the underlying pattern has shaped U.S. foreign policy at least since 1816. The new afterword by Peter Feaver and Christopher Gelpi traces these themes through the first two years of the current Iraq war, showing how civil-military debates and concerns about sensitivity to casualties continue to shape American foreign policy in profound ways.
-
Print length248 pages
-
LanguageEnglish
-
PublisherPrinceton University Press
-
Publication dateSeptember 11, 2005
-
Dimensions6 x 0.67 x 9 inches
-
ISBN-100691124272
-
ISBN-13978-0691124278
Inspire a love of reading with Amazon Book Box for Kids
Discover delightful children's books with Amazon Book Box, a subscription that delivers new books every 1, 2, or 3 months — new Amazon Book Box Prime customers receive 15% off your first box. Sign up now
Frequently bought together
Customers who viewed this item also viewed
What other items do customers buy after viewing this item?
Editorial Reviews
Review
[A] highly statistical but thankfully lucid study. . . . [The authors] find that non-veteran civilian elites are more likely to advocate the use of force than either military elites or civilian leaders with military
experience. . . . The pattern holds historically. The authors consider a total of 111 instances from 1816 to 1992.
"Feaver and Gelpi offer important insights into the character of civil-military relations in the U.S. and into its effects on the nature of U.S. foreign policy. . . . [A]n important work whose findings have wide-ranging policy implications."---Spencer D. Bakich, Virginia Quarterly Review
"Feaver and Gelpi's intriguing and well-executed study provides a welcome contribution to scholarship in this area. In it, the authors address a subset of provocative issues within the broader study of American civil-military relations."---Risa A. Brooks, Review of Politics
Review
"For half a century, demands of mobilization for World War and Cold War put large percentages of Americans through military service. The abrupt end of this pattern of shared experience makes the large difference in attitudes―with civilian elites favoring more intervention and military professionals more restraint―politically critical. Feaver and Gelpi examine the many crucial facets of contemporary civil-military relations with an unusually impressive combination of comprehensiveness, rigor, and clear argument. Their conclusions will alarm some and please others, but they are important for all to understand if national security policy is to be made wisely."―Richard K. Betts, Director, Columbia University Institute of War and Peace Studies
"This is an important work that deserves a wide audience. Peter Feaver and Christopher Gelpi have combined qualitative and quantitative analyses to produce a major piece of scholarship on a subject of great importance. It is difficult to combine rigorous statistical methods with clear prose, but the authors manage it. The writing is clear and the material is accessible to those not trained in statistics."―John Allen Williams, Loyola University Chicago, author of Soldiers, Society, and National Security
"This book demonstrates quite convincingly that the proportion of military veterans in leadership positions in the federal government has an important impact on the propensity of the United States to initiate militarized disputes."―James Lee Ray, Vanderbilt University, author of Democracy and International Conflict
From the Back Cover
"One of those rare works of political science that speaks directly and aptly to an issue of policy. Feaver and Gelpi show that the conventional wisdom about attitudes to military engagement and casualties is, and has been, wrong. More importantly, they explain why. One of the most important contributions to the literature on civil-military relations in years."--Eliot Cohen, author of Supreme Command: Soldiers, Statesmen, and Leadership in Wartime
"For half a century, demands of mobilization for World War and Cold War put large percentages of Americans through military service. The abrupt end of this pattern of shared experience makes the large difference in attitudes--with civilian elites favoring more intervention and military professionals more restraint--politically critical. Feaver and Gelpi examine the many crucial facets of contemporary civil-military relations with an unusually impressive combination of comprehensiveness, rigor, and clear argument. Their conclusions will alarm some and please others, but they are important for all to understand if national security policy is to be made wisely."--Richard K. Betts, Director, Columbia University Institute of War and Peace Studies
"This is an important work that deserves a wide audience. Peter Feaver and Christopher Gelpi have combined qualitative and quantitative analyses to produce a major piece of scholarship on a subject of great importance. It is difficult to combine rigorous statistical methods with clear prose, but the authors manage it. The writing is clear and the material is accessible to those not trained in statistics."--John Allen Williams, Loyola University Chicago, author of Soldiers, Society, and National Security
"This book demonstrates quite convincingly that the proportion of military veterans in leadership positions in the federal government has an important impact on the propensity of the United States to initiate militarized disputes."--James Lee Ray, Vanderbilt University, author of Democracy and International Conflict
About the Author
Don't have a Kindle? Get your Kindle here, or download a FREE Kindle Reading App.
Product details
- Publisher : Princeton University Press; New Ed edition (September 11, 2005)
- Language : English
- Paperback : 248 pages
- ISBN-10 : 0691124272
- ISBN-13 : 978-0691124278
- Item Weight : 14 ounces
- Dimensions : 6 x 0.67 x 9 inches
-
Best Sellers Rank:
#2,260,806 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)
- #2,161 in Political Freedom (Books)
- #13,951 in U.S. Political Science
- #14,063 in History & Theory of Politics
- Customer Reviews: