Will this nonsense language dull our reality or will we be bored to death before the virus reaches us?
The outbreak of coronavirus has led to a rash of cliches , loaded phrases, and weary metaphors. This contamination of our speech is isolating meaning, destroying semantics and, worse still, trivialising the crisis, says Robert Fisk
ot on the heels of the coronavirus infection has come the infection of our language. Covid-19 will pass. The other disease may be more permanent. Within not days but minutes – even seconds – this potentially more long-lasting infection of our speech passed from politicians to reporters to the people. Few of us now question the loaded phrases, the old cliches put to new use, the tired metaphors and the weary references to war and frontlines – even, inevitably I suppose, to the Second World War. It was there yet again in Boris Johnson’s lacklustre new set of "instructions" last night.
If we “self-isolate”, I suspect we are not just closing our front doors. We are also isolating meaning, destroying semantics, misusing our language, mixing cliché with weary metaphor. It won’t make the virus go away, but it will self-isolate the words we speak. Perhaps for a long time. And be sure, there will be more of them.
Last night’s address to the nation contained many of Johnson’s more tiresome and repetitive expressions: “fantastic”, “absolutely”, “amazing”. And the usual comic-cuts logos: twice Covid-19 was “the invisible killer” against which we would “turn the tide” (like Canute, perhaps). The British will “rise to that challenge” as “they have in the past so many times”. What did this mean? Was this another yet another reference to the Luftwaffe bombing of Britain? Or the Brexit vote?
“We will come through stronger than ever,” Johnson insisted. But how, for goodness sake? The British have been “enlisted” in the fight. Good soldiers all. But if Britons are so dedicated to "turning the tide’", what was all this talk of coercion; the “instruction” with which the prime minister would “ensure compliance” from his people, the threats – “if you don’t follow the rules, the police will have the powers to enforce them” – and the two eerie references to “dispersing gatherings”? What was he talking about? House parties, we must assume, or ad hoc football games in the park. Fair enough. But what if the gatherings occurred because more than two people wanted to protest at Johnson’s “instructions”?
Subscribe to Independent Premium to bookmark this article
Want to bookmark your favourite articles and stories to read or reference later? Start your Independent Premium subscription today.
Comments
Share your thoughts and debate the big issues
About The Independent commenting
Independent Premium Comments can be posted by members of our membership scheme, Independent Premium. It allows our most engaged readers to debate the big issues, share their own experiences, discuss real-world solutions, and more. Our journalists will try to respond by joining the threads when they can to create a true meeting of independent Premium. The most insightful comments on all subjects will be published daily in dedicated articles. You can also choose to be emailed when someone replies to your comment.
The existing Open Comments threads will continue to exist for those who do not subscribe to Independent Premium. Due to the sheer scale of this comment community, we are not able to give each post the same level of attention, but we have preserved this area in the interests of open debate. Please continue to respect all commenters and create constructive debates.
Delete Comment
Report Comment
Please be respectful when making a comment and adhere to our Community Guidelines.
You can find our Community Guidelines in full here.
Please be respectful when making a comment and adhere to our Community Guidelines.
You can find our Community Guidelines in full here.