User talk:PohranicniStraze

Sir Henry Vernon[edit]

Vernon was quite an important figure even nationally, bearing in mind his relationship with Arthur Tudor, and of huge importance regionally and locally. I've felt the need for an article to link to for a long time, as I've laboured away at Shropshire and Derbyshre MPs, as well as the collegiate church at Tong. I've never had the time to do it. So thanks very much.Sjwells53 (talk) 12:40, 4 February 2019 (UTC)

• @Sjwells53: You're quite welcome, his article was quite fun to write! PohranicniStraze (talk) 14:55, 4 February 2019 (UTC)

UNESCO Source[edit]

Is unesco information more reliable ?2403:6200:88A6:A2B2:99F7:9367:92FC:271B (talk) 19:08, 10 February 2019 (UTC)

Natchitoches, Louisiana[edit]

Thank you for editing Natchitoches, Louisiana. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 104.243.169.223 (talk) 02:41, 13 March 2019 (UTC)

IP editor comment[edit]

ADD TO CHRISTIAN THEOLOGIANS LIST:

Dr. Donald E. Battle, D.D., B.Th. – One of the top Christian Theologians of the 21st. Century in America. Serving in Ministry for over 32 years: Christology Scholar, Theologian, Minister (Emeritus), Bible Teacher, and Apologist. He graduated from the International Seminary with academic honor in the year 1983. His thesis was entitled, the Divinity of Jesus Christ. He devoted over twenty years of Biblical research on the Lord Jesus Christ. Afterwards, Dr. Battle was inspired by the Scriptures of 1st. Corinthians 2:7-8, to author the Christology: Jesus the Lord of Glory. Dr. Battle is author, editor, and scholar of the Jesus Christ Study Bible: New Testament and Christology (Theology). Dr. Donald E. Battle is the expert on the Divinity of Jesus Christ. His teaching of Christology and Theology are respected by Theologians, Pastors, and Teachers. Dr. Donald E. Battle’s Teachings are concise, practical, and understandable.

DR. DONALD E. BATTLE’S BIBLICAL CHRISTIAN THEOLOGY BOOKS AVAILABLE AT AMAZON.COM.

• Hello, IP editor. I see you have been (repeatedly) attempting to add this individual to a list. If you look at the other list items, you will see that they link to existing articles, because wikipedia is not a repository of random people. I did a quick check on the individual you are attempting to add, and did not see the sort of reliable source coverage that would demonstrate notability and justify his inclusion. If you know of such sources, you would be much better served to create an article incorporating those sources than to keep adding his name onto a list without any supporting sources. That being said, I note that the individual in question previously had a page, which was deleted because it did not demonstrate his notability, so be aware that an article without solid sourcing will probably be deleted again. PohranicniStraze (talk) 04:02, 14 April 2019 (UTC)