User talk:Favonian

This user is busy in real life and may not respond swiftly to queries.

Dear fellow Wikipedian[edit]

Hello and my greetings. I am in no way harassing anyone out here. I have tried to add some valuable information on an article available on wikipedia. But the user named Sitush keeps reverting them back and keeps threatening me. How is this fair to me. Where and to who should i complain to about harassment. I wasn't attacking anyone personally. I do not have any agenda. The page Reservation in India is an incredibly biased page. Either we should be allowed to improve it or we should remove the page from Wikipedia completely. This page is based on sentiments of someone and its not neutral. I understand that this topic is a controversial one among Indian population but we can be civil and remain neutral on the subject at least on the internet. I am sorry but if I am blocked I would refrain from using Wikipedia, I would blacklist it completely, I would complain about it on any platform available and complain to any person I could reach out to with proof about how I was treated on the website for my edits. Thank you and I hope you guys would not abuse your powers. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 160.202.37.47 (talk) 17:21, 6 May 2017‎ (UTC)

Once a user has decided to remove the wall-of-text you plastered on his talk page, you may assume that it's been read. Putting it up there again constitutes harassment and will get you blocked if you persist. Discussion belongs on the article talk page. Favonian (talk) 17:40, 6 May 2017 (UTC)

Sund. explns.[edit]

Hey, Favonian, sorry about the rollback, it's just that person's MO is well-tuned to our natural instincts. ;) Writ Keeper ⚇♔ 18:04, 15 May 2017 (UTC)

Thanks for currecting my blunder! I should have known better, considering how many times I have RBI'ed that dingbat. Favonian (talk) 18:06, 15 May 2017 (UTC)

Newbie[edit]

Is it about time to remove indef protection from Newbie? The last 50 edits go back to 2012, and that was when it was last protected. We should see how it goes unprotected; I've already got it on my watchlist just in case. What do you think? Cheers, Anarchyte (work | talk) 04:59, 16 May 2017 (UTC)

@Anarchyte: Though I don't share your idealistic optimism, the request is ever so much in the spirit of the Pillars and whatnot, so I'm giving it a try. Favonian (talk) 18:17, 16 May 2017 (UTC)

(talk page watcher) YMMV, but in these types of cases I usually put on a three month pending changes protect as a stepping stone to full unprotection to see how much disruption the article is going to experience. --NeilN ^{talk to me} 18:34, 16 May 2017 (UTC)

Let's see how the shock treatment works. A refreshing experience, no doubt. Favonian (talk) 18:37, 16 May 2017 (UTC)

Bad move of Jewish mythology?[edit]

I'm not clear why the history of Jewish mythology has vanished in the move by someone you've warned before.[1] I'd revert it but the history bit confuses me. Doug Weller talk 12:22, 16 May 2017 (UTC)

@Doug Weller: Oh God, him again! :( Looks like Jytdog already took care of it, so I contended myself with restoring Berenice I of Egypt to her more common spelling. Not sure what you mean wrt. vanished history. Looks intact to me, but maybe I misunderstood something. Favonian (talk) 18:13, 16 May 2017 (UTC)

When I looked it was a redirect with no history. See this. Are you going to warn him or? Doug Weller talk 18:33, 16 May 2017 (UTC)

I believe this statement makes it clear that he won't listen to me. Favonian (talk) 18:36, 16 May 2017 (UTC)

See the hatted material at [2]. I think I'll just NOTHERE him, any reason I shouldn't? Doug Weller talk 11:37, 17 May 2017 (UTC)

The only thing that keeps me from doing it is the fact that I already blocked him three times, so go right ahead. Wikipedia will be the better for his departure. Favonian (talk) 11:41, 17 May 2017 (UTC)

Done. Doug Weller talk 14:02, 17 May 2017 (UTC)

Bob Blackman (politician):[edit]

Greetings Favonian. I wonder if you can have a look at the last I/P edit from what I assume is an agile address? This politician is one of several I monitor whose entry gets regularly sanitised prior to a general election leading to national newspaper comments. I have put some comments about correcting errors on the talk page. Is there anything else can be done if only for the sake of my blood pressure? Regards JRPG (talk) 18:48, 17 May 2017 (UTC)

Since the information was sourced to something that doesn't look like the Daily Mail, I have reinstated it. If the effort is "systematic", a protection may be possible, but it could end up at BLP/N. Lots of potential for drama. Favonian (talk) 18:54, 17 May 2017 (UTC)

Thanks for that. I've also been trying to encourage the I/p to use the talk page but seriously doubt if he's looked at it. Hopefully he'll take more notice of you. Regards JRPG (talk) 20:34, 17 May 2017 (UTC)

This is a job for...[edit]

...you! :-) Block this one, plz? They haven't edited but we know who it is... and even if it weren't them, it's still a username violation. --bonadea contributions talk 12:17, 18 May 2017 (UTC)

"Competing causes of death" as they say in the forensic business. Favonian (talk) 12:19, 18 May 2017 (UTC)

Ha! Thanks. --bonadea contributions talk 12:22, 18 May 2017 (UTC)

190.122.53.225 (talk · contribs · WHOIS)[edit]

Hello, I saw you reverted an edit of this IP in Regular show, but I recommend you to block him, he is just a vandal that is sure of the existence of an inexistent 9 season and he had already been blocked a lot of times in the Spanish Wikipedia

Cheers

Mordecai (talk) 16:51, 18 May 2017 (UTC) Mordecai (talk) 16:51, 18 May 2017 (UTC)

I reverted the IP three weeks ago, whereupon a fellow admin blocked it for a month. Nothing more to do. Favonian (talk) 17:07, 18 May 2017 (UTC)

Are you also one of the leftist freaks that's really a man pretending to be woman? It's so sad that what is supposed to be neutral encyclopedia has fallen to you deranged SJW filth.[edit]

This was why Trump was elected, so that we can finally get rid of deranged communist vermin like yourself.

People that claim to be "genderfluid" are vermin. You freaks are not even human.[edit]

You all need to be wiped out.