Page 2 of 23: | [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12] |
Index | 225 reviews in total |
Yet another remake
but the trailers for this one were at least
encouraging, especially with Denzel Washington playing the lead.
I have vague memories of seeing the original The Magnificent Seven,
(which is in itself a re-imagining of Seven Samurai), and I seem to
remember liking it. I think 56 years is long enough of a gap to justify
a remake, so I'll give them a pass on this one (although you could
argue that 1980's Battle Beyond the Stars was another Seven Samurai
remake). So what was it like?
Each character was steadily added to the team, they had a
bonding/preparing the town montage, the bad guys showed up, they shot
each other a lot, characters were killed, the film ended. Pretty much
what I was expecting, and that's fine.
Personally, I love Westerns (The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly is one of
my favourite films ever), so for me this formula really worked. Is it
going to win any awards? Probably not, but the performances were good
(although it might be hard to argue that Chris Pratt was acting
anything other than himself, which again, is fine), it looked good, and
most importantly, I was entertained.
(From my blog site: whingewood.wordpress.com)
First off, I've seen both the original "Seven Samurai" and the Yule
Brenner, Charles Bronson, Steve McQueen version about a hundred times;
I love both of those movies. I thought this version was great. Is it
the greatest movie of all time? Of course not. Is it a reflection of
how movies are done today? Of course it is?
There are unquestionably some holes in the story. People point to the
Gatling Gun scene as totally over the top. And, Yes. It is over the
top. The Gatling Gun, however, was a huge leap forward in firearm
technology and if the movie makers were prone to a little exaggeration,
I'm okay with that. My guess is any late 1800's cowboy who came up
against a Gatling Gun and survived would probably also heavily
exaggerate the story when telling it.
The other issue I keep hearing is that some of the seven join up for
almost no reason. They just "join up". Okay, again, true. But I
challenge you to watch the 1960's version again. If you are truly
honest with that film at least 3 members of that seven join up because
they have "nothing better to do". I actually think the idea of a bounty
hunter rounding up guys who have a bounty on them kinda makes sense.
Both the town and the team are way more culturally diverse than ever
would have happened in the late 1800's. But did you really think
Hollywood could make a movie in which all the bad guys are Mexicans and
all the heroes are white guys like in the 1960's version? (Okay Charles
Bronson's character was HALF-Mexican.)
This version is very entertaining. It's a fun escape. It's an action
movie which isn't another damned superhero movie. The female lead is
phenomenal. Denzel is Denzel-ishly great. Chris Pratt is both
entertaining and a solid second-in-command. The other characters fill
in the blanks nicely. The strangely culturally diverse town
participates in their own salvation. The action scenes are well done,
if not completely realistic. It's a re-imagined version that pays
tribute in many places to both the original and the 1960's remake.
Go see the movie and have fun like I did. And if you are one of those
people that needs complete realism. Then sit at home and think about
how boring complete realism would be.
The Western has long become a rarity on the big screen, replaced over the last few decades as the dominant action genre first by bulging muscles and explosions, then by spandex and superpowers. So this big-budget remake of the 1960 classic comes as a welcome breath of tobacco-filled air, even if it doesn't quite live up to its predecessor. But as a piece of popcorn entertainment, it fires on all cylinders. Not surprisingly with Antoine Fuqua (Training Day, The Equalizer, Shooter) calling the shots, subtlety is pushed aside for frenetic set pieces and belief-defying heroics, especially in the wild climactic showdown that demonstrates minimal CGI does not equal minimal fun. Amongst all the balletic gunplay and macho posturing there's a relatively simple story: town is overrun by a dastardly villain (Peter Sarsgaard oozing creepiness), town employs cowboys-for-hire (guess how many) for protection, town fights with said cowboys leading the way. That the plot requires little more explanation then that highlights the focus of the movie, for better and for worse, however the fact it never feels shallow or superficial can be attributed to the exhilarating action and the ultra-cool cast. And what a fantastic cast it is. Denzel Washington is reliably charismatic as the contemplative leader, Chris Pratt is magnetic as the group's joker, Ethan Hawke is intense as the tormented sniper, Byung-hun Lee is enigmatic as the blade-wielding assassin, Vincent D'Onofrio is intriguing as the philosophical killer and Haley Bennett is fierce as the townswoman who stands her ground. Best of all, the eclectic characters also including Manuel Garcia-Rulfo as the rowdy Mexican and Martin Sensmeier as the Indian warrior share a wonderful chemistry that makes them utterly watchable from start to finish. An energetic remake with style to spare, The Magnificent Seven is a rip-roaring adventure that'll please long-neglected Western fans to no end.
*** This review may contain spoilers ***
Antoine fuqua is a director that others in Hollywood need to pay
attention to, 2014 he gave us the brilliant remake of The Equaliser and
now in 2016 he took on his biggest and bravest role with the classic
western "the magnificent seven"
Antoine has yet again been a success with a truly amazing remake with
Oscar award winning performances from Denzil Washington and Hayley
Bennett. The story of 7 mismatched gun slingers who band together to
help save a town from the coruption that is bleeding it dry, With
superb supporting acting from Chris Pratt, Ethan Hawke, Vincent
D'Onofrio and Byung-hun Lee the magnificent severn is a masterpiece and
its that good the 1960s original magnificent seven take their hat's of
this remake.
With the perfect bad guy in Peter Sarsgaard this is one of the best
film releases of 2016.
This is a must go and see. Definitely a collection keeper. The western is back. Denzel was fabulous at his craft as always, along with the rest of the cast, they fulfilled exactly the mood needed to have an old western feel again in the cinema. The story is strong as well as the action scenes. No spoiler here just go and enjoy this to the fullest. I never expected to be this well entertained. Do not wait to buy the not yet available video, this is a definite popcorn and soda night. Well defined roles in the movie show the talent of the writers, director and creator of this art form, the cinematographers were dead on the mark of capturing the action. every element of life is represented here and the ending is is as good as the beginning! There are western movies and then there are western movies that you don't forget, this one of them. So my conclusion to this piece of work is 10/10, and gets no better than that for me!!
*** This review may contain spoilers ***
It's a risky move to remake a film that's already been told twice, the
last time (in the 60's), a very well reputed western and the version
before that (in the 50's) being a truly excellent Japanese samurai
epic.
So what do we have here a film based on a familiar plot, with
familiar characters and familiar well-known outcome? Looks like a
recipe for disaster WRONG! If you're becoming bored with Marvel
superhero films then this offers an alternative anti-hero style film.
The cast here are more diverse than in previous versions but I feel
they were perfectly chosen for the current time, you gradually get to
know and care about each of the characters. The film also has a great
mixture of comedy, bright one-liners are thrown into some scenes,
sometimes lessening the tension.
Looking at the trailer I had great expectations. The film revolves
around an assembly of goodhearted criminals and eccentrics, who soon
unite over a common cause, specifically the take down of a particularly
threatening villain with land grabbing intentions, if he wanted
something then he'd just take it! So the film begins. Initially the
group's motivation was all about financial reward but ended with being
all about pride and honour. It was fascinating to watch the seven
anti-heroes slowly banter and bicker their way to becoming a formidable
force.
The second act takes us through planning and training the townsfolk to
help fight the villain, who returns with an army of 100's and also a
Gatling gun.
The third act provides the most action and atmosphere, while the epic
battle finale is a spine tingling climax. How it managed to gain a cert
12A is totally beyond me, you could easily mistake this for a cert 15.
Very highly recommended.
*** This review may contain spoilers ***
There is a huge gun battle so those who are watching for that will be
satisfied. Sadly this movie could have been better written. The dialog
isn't clever in fact it sounds dumb most of the time. The humor falls
flat too. There are some silly plot elements and a draggy middle
section.
It was fun to see them fortify and how their traps worked out. The
filming is beautiful and the scenery is more colorful than the usual
Westerns.
The big battle delivers a huge climax. The machine gun thing was out of
place. Sometimes it was hard to make out who was shooting who and who
was getting shot.
The ending was weak. Why Bogue would just walk in there and have a one
on one with Denzel is just illogical. As a modern twist the brown red
and black heroes are the ones left standing.
The cast is generally likable. Ethan Hawke looks haggard for someone in
his mid 40s. Denzel looks trimmer than of late. Chris Pratt could still
lose about 20 pounds. Byung Hun Lee is okay. The standout is Vincent
D'Onofrio who really acts different in different roles. See him in
Daredevil? Cam Gigandet looks like a classic Western bad guy. Haley
Bennett is quite believable - not too pretty to be unrealistic.
One major casting mistake: Peter Sarsgaard doesn't have the malevolence
required to be a villain. His sing song way of talking sounds slimy not
nasty.
Not a must watch.
Come on now. If you're going to re-make "The Magnificent 7" let's do it
magnificently. Where was that great music? Where is the superlative
cast that include Yul Brynner, Eli Wallach, Steve McQueen, Charles
Bronson, James Coburn, and Vladimir Sokoloff? You might argue that
Denzel Washington and Chris Pratt are on a level with Brynner and
McQueen, but I wouldn't. Pratt certainly has potential, but he doesn't
yet have McQueen's star power. The rest are pale imitations, except
perhaps for an unbelievably fat Vincent D'Onofrio who is certainly
entertaining.
This is a modern re-telling. You might call it the Diversity 7. The
producers threw in just about every minority you can think of
Mexican, Asian, Black, Woman. The only thing missing was a "little"
person .
Personally I liked the idea of the woman, played very well by Haley
Bennett who has been with Washington before ("The Equalizer").
An action film like this works only when the villain is villainous. Eli
Wallach was terrific. Peter Sarsgaard wouldn't scare a fly.
Don't get me wrong. I enjoyed it. It's OK, but it's not magnificent.
Many others have varying opinions of this movie. I enjoy a good western and this was a sufficient presentation. However, I laughed right out loud numerous times....at the women's costumes. Did they raid every 1950s B-western warehouse to dress these poor women? Supposedly set in 1879, sadly you would have no idea what the average woman wore anywhere near that time by watching this movie. It is inconceivable that Haley Bennet's portrayal of a farmer's wife would be walking around exposing her décolletage. And don't get me started about the saloon girls! As a living historian in a remote Arizona town founded in the 1860s, I am routinely appalled at the "shady ladies" prancing around with their corsets exposed. A little (and I do mean little) research proves these styles incorrect. In this day and age, I find it appalling to watch a movie with so little effort made in women's clothing.
OK, first you need to know that the only thing I remember from the
original is the music--and your reward for sitting through this is that
you get that music during the end credits.
I am ALL for diversity and want to see more actors of color in roles
that could be played by any ethnicity, but this movie bends over
backwards to be SO inclusive, that the viewer is distracted by that.
You've got a black man, a Hispanic, a Native American, an Irishman, an
Asian, a fat guy, an old guy, a god-fearing guy (OK, the last 3 are all
rolled into one) and a woman! And at least one of these people is
probably gay--not that there's anything wrong with that.
It's mostly shoot 'em up, and ....... Oh wait, it's ALL shoot 'em up.
Page 2 of 23: | [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12] |
Plot summary | Plot synopsis | Ratings |
Awards | External reviews | Parents Guide |
Official site | Plot keywords | Main details |
Your user reviews | Your vote history |