User talk:CAPTAIN RAJU

Leave a message Send an Email

Archives
Archive 1 Archive 2 Archive 3 Archive 4 Archive 5 Archive 6 Archive 7 Archive 8 Archive 9 Archive 10 Archive 11 Archive 12 Archive 13 Archive 14 Archive 15 Archive 16 Archive 17 Archive 18 Archive 19 Archive 20 Archive 21 Archive 22 Archive 23 Archive 24 Archive 25 Archive 26 Archive 27 Archive 28 Archive 29 Archive 30 Archive 31 Archive 32

Welcome from WP:STiki![edit]

Hello, CAPTAIN RAJU, and welcome to STiki! Thank you for your recent contributions using our tool. We at STiki hope you like using the tool and decide to continue using it in the future. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: Information about STiki, including: Using STiki and its hotkeys Comparison with other tools Information about vandalism on Wikipedia Here are some pages which are a little more fun: The STiki leaderboard - See how you are faring against other STiki users! Userboxes - Do not hesitate to wear the STiki label with pride by choosing from a selection of userboxes! We hope you enjoy maintaining Wikipedia with STiki! If you have any questions, problems, or suggestions don't hesitate to drop a note over at the STiki talk page and we'll be more than happy to help. Again, welcome, and thanks! West.andrew.g (talk) 18:30, 2 October 2015 (UTC)

West.andrew.g, Thanks for a STiki welcome messages. CAPTAIN RAJU ^(talk)18:42, 02 October 2015 (UTC)

Congratulations from STiki![edit]

	The Anti-Vandalism + STiki Barnstar
	Congratulations, CAPTAIN RAJU! You're receiving this barnstar because you recently crossed the 1,000 classification threshold using STiki. We thank you both for your contributions to Wikipedia at-large and your use of the tool. We hope you continue your ascent up the leaderboard and stay in touch at the talk page. Thank you and keep up the good work! West.andrew.g (developer) and Orphan Wiki 17:37, 7 January 2016 (UTC)

Orphan Wiki, Thanks for a STiki Barnstar. CAPTAIN RAJU ^(✉) 17:44, 7 January 2016 (UTC)

No problem! :) Orphan Wiki 17:57, 7 January 2016 (UTC)

Your signature[edit]

Every RfA or large discussion allows me to nitpick about user's signatures, since I have a syntax highlighting gadget. It must be the web developer in me :) If you could kindly change your signature to the following, that would be lovely:

[[User:CAPTAIN RAJU| <span style="color:teal;font-family:Parchment;font-size:13px;">CAPTAIN RAJU</span>]] ^{([[User talk:CAPTAIN RAJU|<span style="color:#800000">✉</span>]])}

This is identical to your current signature CAPTAIN RAJU ^(✉) except that it is valid HTML/wikitext. Best — MusikAnimal ^talk 01:19, 3 January 2017 (UTC)

Hi,MusikAnimal Thank you for giving messege.I've changed my signature.See below my signature.

<span style="text-shadow:#00FFFF ;font-family:Parchment;0.3em 0.3em 0.3em">[[User:CAPTAIN RAJU|<font color="#008080">CAPTAIN RAJU</font>]][[User talk:CAPTAIN RAJU|<font color="#FF0000"> (✉)</font>]]</span> =CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 18:05, 3 January 2017 (UTC)

Now ok my signature?CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 18:05, 3 January 2017 (UTC)

Yep! It looks good and is valid HTML :) Many thanks — MusikAnimal ^talk 01:09, 4 January 2017 (UTC)

The Holiday Season past[edit]

Thanks so much for the kind Holiday message. I'm behind as usual, but I do want to express my appreciation. Hope your own holiday season was perfectly joyous. 78.26 _{(spin me / revolutions)} 17:07, 3 January 2017 (UTC)

Hi There

You replied to my edit on Keith Haring's page. I actually think that comment is very constructive. Keith Harring should be referred to as a gay artist and activist because his work focused on gay issues, namely HIV/AIDS and sexual themes. The more innocuous work has subsequently been licensed for use on clothing and luggage, etc. but his intent at the time he was an activist street-artist creating visibility for an invisible community. It was a critical part of his identity and it deserves to be represented in the opening.

Hello, I'm CAPTAIN RAJU. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Keith Haring have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 18:16, 9 November 2016 (UTC)

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:24.103.69.26&diff=cur — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.103.69.26 (talk) 19:39, 3 January 2017 (UTC)

You are mistaken[edit]

Hello Raju, It wasn't me who removed the speedy deletion tag on the article Shikhamani, but it was removed by the admin Graeme Bartlett (talk · contribs). If you check the edit history of the page, you could understand it.Jayabilla (talk) 11:49, 4 January 2017 (UTC)

Hi,Jayabilla I understand your message.this film previously delete by G5: Creation by a banned or blocked user (Padmalakshmisx) in violation of ban or block.The film was created by User:Murkhashigamani somedays ago.See here.This user now has the blocked by sock puppetry.Thanks.CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 12:29, 4 January 2017 (UTC)

For db-banned I expect that the creator is already blocked, or listed at SPI, or some other evidence is supplied. I don't know if the tagging is by mistake or if Jayabilla is going to be blocked soon, in which case the article can be eliminated then. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 11:56, 4 January 2017 (UTC)

Hello,Graeme Bartlett.This (Shikhamani) film obviously sock puppetry because,Shikhamani film was created by User:Murkhashigamani some days ago(2016-11-18).See here.But now,User:Murkhashigamani has the blocked by sock puppetry.Thanks.CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 12:44, 4 January 2017 (UTC)

Wikipedia:WPCleaner edits in user space[edit]

Hi CAPTAIN RAJU,

Could you please stop making edits like this: [1] in user space (you first came to my attention when you did something similar on my talk page a few months ago. In article space, I can grudgingly see why someone might want to make those two edits - grudgingly - although it is generally accepted that edits that make zero difference to the reader shouldn't be made automatically or semi-automatically by themselves. But it is worse than useless in user space, and is annoying too. You are referencing WP:WCW in your edit summary, but that project is intended to be about "checking" article space. Edits that actually fix something - like html code fixes or something - seem marginally acceptable even in user space (I will assume that's what was happening here], although I don't know html so I can't be sure). But please discontinue edits to people's user pages that aren't actually fixing something that is clearly broken. --Floquenbeam (talk) 22:44, 4 January 2017 (UTC)