www.fgks.org   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

Warning: The NCBI web site requires JavaScript to function. more...

Display Settings:

Format

Send to:

Choose Destination
See comment in PubMed Commons below
Vaccine. 2013 Dec 5;31(50):5975-82. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2013.10.031. Epub 2013 Oct 19.

Evaluating the safety of influenza vaccine using a claims-based health system.

Author information

  • 1Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 1600 Clifton Road, MS-D26, Atlanta, GA 30333, USA. Electronic address: nmccarthy@cdc.gov.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION:

As part of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's monitoring and evaluation activities for influenza vaccines, we examined relationships between influenza vaccination and selected outcomes in the 2009-2010 and 2010-2011 influenza seasons in a claims-based data environment.

METHODS:

We included patients with claims for trivalent influenza vaccine (TIV) and/or 2009 pandemic influenza A H1N1 vaccine (H1N1) during the 2009-2010 and 2010-2011 influenza seasons. Patients were followed for several pre-specified outcomes identified in claims. Seizures and Guillain-Barré Syndrome were selected a priori for medical record confirmation. We estimated incidence rate ratios (IRR) using a self-controlled risk interval (SCRI) or a historical comparison design. Outcomes with elevated IRRs, not selected a priori for medical record review, were further investigated with review of claims histories surrounding the outcome date to determine whether the potential event could be ruled-out or attributed to other causes based on the pattern of medical care.

RESULTS:

In the 2009-2010 season, no significant increased risks for outcomes following H1N1 vaccination were observed. Following TIV administration, the IRR for peripheral nervous system disorders and neuropathy was slightly elevated (1.07, 95% CI: 1.01-1.13). The IRR for anaphylaxis following TIV was 28.55 (95% CI: 3.57-228.44). After further investigation of claims histories, the majority of potential anaphylaxis cases had additional claims around the time of the event indicating alternate explanatory factors or diagnoses. In the 2010-2011 season following TIV administration, a non-significant elevated IRR for anaphylaxis was observed with no other significant outcome findings.

CONCLUSION:

After claims history review, we ultimately found no increased outcome risk following administration of 998,881 TIV and 538,257 H1N1 vaccine doses in the 2009-2010 season, and 1,158,932 TIV doses in the 2010-2011 season.

Published by Elsevier Ltd.

KEYWORDS:

Claims; H1N1; Influenza; Vaccine safety

PMID:
24148577
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
PubMed Commons home

PubMed Commons

0 comments
How to join PubMed Commons

    Supplemental Content

    Icon for Elsevier Science
    Loading ...
    Write to the Help Desk