Fixx

I have never thought PS is complicated app. People who find it so probably are missing some basic understanding about pixel graphics. Sure there are a lot of features but basic operations are...

Sigh. PS is flexible, but LR is faster with bigger amounts of pictures. I would hate to use solely PS (which I did before LR, since PS version 2). Usual workflow is to do basic work in LR and fine...

I would really like to shoot portraits with my iPhone. Zooming with iPhone gives low res images. Add-on telephoto would help here a lot.
And yes, if I want hi quality portraits, I shoot with Nikon...

also SE is popular..

With white bg it is so much easier to read.

cmd+

IMHO WA macro is not very useful invention. Instead this might be really useful in architectural photography... but considering the IQ maybe not.
(Yes, there is no AF/autoaperture in shift lenses.....

There are many people, me included, who would rather not carry yet another camera with us, but use phones for not so serious shooting. And I really REALLY would like to have focal length suitable...

Should have teleconverter... :-)

WinPhun just doesn't sound convincing.

Just get a DMC-XS3 for 100 €. Looks as cool and probably has as good image quality too.

I can understand why I would want attach an olloclip telephoto lens, but with all this gear we reach the point where it is more sensible use a dedicated camera with normal equipment.

I am not much into zooms but decent optics for portraiture would be cool. Wideangles just do not do it.

I thought "Pro" gets plug-ins for LR etc?