MikeF4Black

More megapixels is smaller pixels in the same sensor size. That means more motion blur per pixel, for any give motion speed. I thought everybody knew that.

Great article, great images btw. Very...

To "NOT keep up". Obviously. Correct typing is always a challenge.

I'm a lawyer. I certainly can't afford to keep up with the latest developments. My clients would stop paying their bills in a flash.

Sensible decision, albeit very late as this was a known issue for two weeks.

(Only slightly) off topic: I find the (new?) DPR play-on-words pun editorial approach ("waterfail") rather immature and not a pleasure to read at all.

Diglloyd, May 17:

UPDATE 17 May: I’m hearing from Adobe that Pentax SuperRes pixel shift mode with Motion Correction WILL NOT be supported in Adobe Camera Raw “at this time”. I’m waiting to hear...

Maybe Diglloyd has done a better test, with less devastating results?

YES!

@Howabout: Which, for me as an 810 owner, is slightly disappointing news.
Not better in accuracy and consistency, better in low light, slightly inferior spread of AF points.

Am I right?

Comparing different sensor size cameras can only lead to one conclusion: different sensor size. And of course to endless comments on what that means.

@Favorable: the D8something will have some of the D5/D500 upgrades, tailored to deal with the 36? 52? MP processing needs.

EM1??? Whatever for?

Headache inducing

You wrote "Look back in anger", right?

D810 successor might have.

For those that exist in a taste-free zone.

Shocked and sad.

@Yake: frame filling or not is personal preference, but for judging a lens I'd go for frame filling, otherwise it's too easy.

@Yake: nrs 8, 35 and 30 were close up, and reasonably sharp where it mattered but dull elsewhere. I looked.

Much appreciated Favorable. Do you mind if I don't remind you? 🤔