guyfawkes

I use Franzis' Denoise and B&W Projects 4, and whilst they have a significant learning curve compared to more simple programs, they were certainly worth the intro price I paid.   B&W has far more ...

Plastic mounts may not be as robust as metal, and would certainly not stand up to years of heavy use, but for a small light lens like this one, I doubt it is a disadvantage.

As far as I have determined it is not a ring light, but two separate LED's and I assume, then, that images may have shadows from uneven illumination. This is not to knock the lens, just that true...

Or, how about the Yashica Dental Eye cameras, see here:

http://camera-wiki.org/wiki/Yashica_Dental_Eye

Both have non-detachable lenses, unlike the Nikon. As for usability, they are almost idiot...

Only a thought, as the equivalent aperture calculation does not affect exposure and you can see the DoF anyway on the camera screen, how would knowing it be of actual benefit?

Good point. The pixel count isn't enough in itself to equal quality. Whereas a good lens, a la our Canon models, is.

Well, if it didn't, you can always try here:

http://www.custombellows.co.uk/ :D)

Same reaction here. I find white on black background far easier on my eyes, rather than a glaring expanse of white background. At least, DPR, please leave it as a selectable option.

@stevo23. "...it was about trying to market a solution that most people weren't even looking for.)

I suppose you could say this, too, about the digital stills revolution. I doubt many, if any,...

I, too, thought about it, but it wasn't the 4meg images (my first digital camera, Canon G2, had this, and I was perfectly happy at the time, still am when I go back and view them) that bothered me...

I should have added for clarity that the 127 film is not spooled so users will need to keep spools and backing paper from used films for self spooling. Not a problem if, like me, you do your own...

But Kodak Royal X Pan had an even faster base ISO of 1,250 or ASA as it would have been then. It had grain like golf balls, but shot with an 8X Red filter in sunlight (!) it could produce sharp...

@ FredSpain, here it is: Nikon AF-S NIKKOR 600mm f/4E FL ED VR. And in the UK it retails at a whopping £9,649. Ouch!

One of the UK dealers is already used by me, Yippee! Fantastic to see that 127 roll film is there, too. I still get my Yashica LM out from time to time, and will now not have to rely on outdated...

Carey, it may take a while for ACR to support the camera, but what was wrong in not using Sony's own RAW converter software and which I assume ships with the camera?

Some do, but you need Fuji if skin tone is important.

An interesting comparison, and shows the Sony in a better light. Sorry about the pun. I can't explain why, but the dpr images look decidedly poor on my 1080p monitor. None appear that sharp and...

I'm mainly interested in converting images to b/w, in pp, and for this I use Black White Projects 4, a paid for German software program. Nevertheless, not wishing to look a gift horse in the...

Substitute "suite" for "collection" and it becomes clear.

Well, we've seen manufacturers increase sensor size, cram in more pixels, and so I suppose this must be the next gimmick to persuade the unsuspecting this must be the next big improvement and a...