Return-path: <WHE_WILLIAM@flo.org> Received: from flo.org by VMSVAX.SIMMONS.EDU (PMDF V4.3-10 #8767) id <01HKPOPEWXHS00B513@VMSVAX.SIMMONS.EDU>; Fri, 16 Dec 1994 13:39:09 -0500 (EST) Date: Fri, 16 Dec 1994 13:41:08 -0500 (EST) From: Michael Williamson <WHE_WILLIAM@flo.org> Subject: Case Study: Scientific Whaling To: whalenet@VMSVAX.SIMMONS.EDU Message-id: <941216134108.2e46@flo.org> Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT From: SMTP%"MARMAM@UVVM.BITNET" 15-DEC-1994 18:24:08.38 To: WHE_WILLIAM CC: Subj: WHAT'S WRONG WITH WHALE CULTISTS? Date: Thu, 15 Dec 1994 15:18:04 PST Reply-To: Marine Mammals Research and Conservation Discussion <MARMAM@UVVM.BITNET> Sender: Marine Mammals Research and Conservation Discussion <MARMAM@UVVM.BITNET> From: Alan Macnow <amacnow@igc.apc.org> Subject: WHAT'S WRONG WITH WHALE CULTISTS? To: Multiple recipients of list MARMAM <MARMAM@UVVM.BITNET> ----------------------------Original message---------------------------- FROM: Alan Macnow Tele-Press Associates,Inc. 321 East 53 Street New York, N.Y., 10022 Tel: (212) 688-5580 Fax: (212) 688-5857 FOR: Japan Whaling Association WHALE PROTECTION GROUPS GET UGLY IN ASSAULT ON RESEARCH RIGHTS Is the slaughter of chickens in the United States the moral equivalent of the Holocaust? It is, according to the fa- natical animal rights group PETA. Is the taking for research of 300 whales from a population exceeding three quarters of a mil- lion animals equivalent to the bombing of Pearl Harbor? It is, according to the most recent pronouncement of a coalition of ex- tremist whale protection groups calling itself the Antarctica Project. Notwithstanding the fact that gross exaggeration seems to be the stock in trade of fund-raising appeals, or that the strategy of animal rights groups is to blur the distinction be- tween people and animals, such comparisons are odious and demeaning to the human victims of oppression and war. In a further attempt to inflame emotions against Japan, the Antarctica Project and Greenpeace, in a flurry of press releases, accused Japan of violating the sanctity of the Southern Ocean Whale Sanctuary by continuing its research there. Japan's Antarctic whale research project, begun in 1988, takes a random sampling of 300 Antarctic minke whales each year from a population that numbers over 760,000 animals. The species is unendangered and no other types of whales are touched. The research is authorized by the International Con- vention for the Regulation of Whaling. The small number taken is well below annual replacements through reproduction. The Sanctuary, a contrivance devised by a handful of anti-whaling countries to be a hallowed haven for their sacred cow of the sea, occupies 19 million square miles of ocean northward of Antarctica. If applied to the Northern Hemisphere it would encompass everything from the North Pole down to Lis- bon's latitude. The Sanctuary specifically bans commercial whaling, but encourages research. Designation of the Sanctuary represents the attempted expropriation of international waters by only 23 of the IWC's 41 members. They represent a very small share of the almost 200 countries of the world, most of whom were never consulted. It also was done without the approval of the International Whaling Commission's Scientific Committee, the Commission for the Con- servation of Antarctic Living Marine Resources, or the scores of countries dependent upon ocean resources. In fact, the designation of the Sanctuary violated the principles and provisions of the International Convention for the Regulation of Whaling, which requires the IWC to: "provide for the conservation, development, and utilization of the whale resources." The major provision of the United Nations Confer- ence on Environment and Development, calling for sustainable use of renewable natural resources, was trashed as well. The IWC's Scientific Committee, with the exception of a few scientists employed by anti-whaling groups, saw no value in the Sanctuary because use of its revised management procedures would safeguard and rebuild all of the depleted stocks in the Southern Ocean while providing for limited use of such abundant species as the minkes. Moreover, establishment of a Sanctuary would be an abdication of the IWC's duty to manage whale stocks as required by the International Convention for the Regulation of Whaling. Although Japan opposed establishment of a Sanctuary and considers it illegal in terms of the whaling Convention, it will not resume commercial whaling until the IWC ends its whaling moratorium. Isn't it time for a moratorium on the dishonest and un- principled attempts to inflame emotions against Japan? -end-