Return-Path: <WHE_WILLIAM@flo.org> Received: from flo.org by VMSVAX.SIMMONS.EDU (MX V3.1C) with SMTP; Sat, 28 May 1994 22:02:00 EDT Date: Sat, 28 May 1994 22:07:07 -0400 (EDT) From: WHE_WILLIAM@flo.org To: whalenet@vmsvax.simmons.edu Message-ID: <940528220707.266@flo.org> Subject: IWC Whale Management Plan From: SMTP%"MARMAM@UVVM.BITNET" 28-MAY-1994 10:58:39.52 To: WHE_WILLIAM CC: Subj: IWC Approves Whale Management Date: Sat, 28 May 1994 13:10:00 UTC Reply-To: Marine Mammals Research and Conservation Discussion <MARMAM@UVVM.BITNET> Sender: Marine Mammals Research and Conservation Discussion <MARMAM@UVVM.BITNET> Comments: Warning -- original Sender: tag was rbaird@SOL.UVIC.CA From: r.mallon1@genie.geis.com Subject: IWC Approves Whale Management X-To: marmam@uvvm.uvic.ca To: Multiple recipients of list MARMAM <MARMAM@UVVM.BITNET> IWC APPROVES WHALE MANAGEMENT RESOLUTION By Christine Tierney PUERTO VALLARTA, Mexico, May 27 (Reuter) - The International Whaling Commission (IWC) Friday accepted a crucial part of a programme to manage commercial whaling, but delegates stressed the move did not sanction a resumption of hunting until many other elements of the plan were in place. The IWC's acceptance of the so-called Revised Management Procedure (RMP) seemed designed to signal that the organisation's establishment of an Antarctic whale sanctuary Thursday did not mean it had abandoned its original mandate of managing the whaling industry. The resolution accepting the RMP was passed by consensus, but delegates said it could not lead to a resumption of commercial whaling in the near future. ``The United States does not support the resumption of commercial whaling and does not foresee a resumption of commercial whaling in the near future,'' said a member of the U.S. delegation, which introduced the resolution. The RMP includes a mathematical formula to set kill quotas based on historical whaling data, but it is only one piece of a wider management scheme that needs to be put into place before the IWC can reconsider a six-year moratorium on commercial whaling. Britain withdrew as a sponsor of the RMP resolution, saying it objected to its failure to mention humane killing as an essential part of any new whale management system. The delegates pushing the resolution stressed that many other issues needed to be discussed before a wider scheme could be put into place, including the impact on whales of environmental degradation, illicit trade of whale products, inspection of whaling methods, and catch and quota enforcement. Delegates and participants said it could take anywhere between two and 10 years for such a scheme to be completed. Some environmental groups viewed the RMP resolution as a sinister exchange for the establishment of the sanctuary, but U.S. officials denied that there was any behind-the-scenes deal. ``There is no quid-pro-quo between the sanctuary and the RMP,'' said Brian Gorman, a spokesman for the U.S. delegation. But he added, ``We think that if there is to be whaling of any kind, it ought to be done scientifically and under the aegis of the IWC.'' A European delegate said the IWC risked breaking apart if the backers of the sanctuary had also blocked progress on the RMP. If (Japan and Norway) decide the IWC will never lift the moratorium, what's to keep them in the IWC?'' the delegate said. Separately, the commission adopted a resolution praising Russia for releasing information on the illegal whaling activities of Soviet vessels in the 1960s.