RidgeRunner22

That not what this market is about, potentially it could be carried along side a serious ILC as your wide lens that you don't have to switch to. The Nikon A and the GR are both that good, I've used...

I'm not sure it's even that important on an 18

Somewhere around a 28 on the a6300, sigh if only E mount came in anon-Sony flavor.

Lens test aside a state of the art APSC sensor will produce better prints, if not In ultimate resolution(certain Sony lenses such as the Loxia will absolutely resolve at near the pixel level), then...

That could very well be. Sony seems to have all the technology available to them, but their bodies always feel laggy and awkward particularly in the cold. And I certainly hope "weather sealing" on...

EVFs are great for focusing, and accurate metering. But, if your subject is moving and you want the ability to frame after the first shot, OVF is still the way to go. I laugh ever time I see him do...

Very usefull for those of us with a collection on manual glass, who still prefer the optical VF in certain scenarios.

Not if your scene exceeds 10 or 11 stops or so, which in certain environments isn't uncommon.

What I'm saying is IF you have high ISO abilities, then in theory you could use slower high quality glass and have a nice compact system that you can use anywhere. The only modern top of the line...

What if you picked a 2.8 over a 1.8, for IQ and compact size. I hate this modern myth that the only good lenses are 1.8 or faster, it's making all the good new glass gigantic . It was better when...

I am just curious if you actually use 1.4 in practice, I don do portrait work so I honestly don't know. But, 85 1.4 on a FF seems like a very narrow DOF to me. I tend be more interested in this...

Ha! for some reason I got a real kick out of this one. Looks like s lovely lens! Wish they would make one equally sharp a few stops slower, and way smaller. When do you use an 85 at 1.4? sounds...

I actually feel that capture one is almost preprocessed, which is fine if you like that look,but I still feel Photoshop is the most flexible of processing software.

It seems to me that every raw capable camera I've owned has required a different approach to get the look I want. I don't think that is ACRs fault, besides pretty much every good printmaker In the...

Yes and for certain aplications MF IS the point of being sufficient. not sure what your point is

Not that I know much about it but it looks like the lx100 is only 50g heavier with a built in viewfinder? No, wide version though

Why not a Hybrid Vf something like the X100(I think it's cool anyway)?maybe in place of the flash to keep the size? Regardless, I don't think that Nikon has the following that Ricoh has for this ...

Purchased both the GR first and later the A so I would say some people bought them😉. The GR has quite the following. any way the lenses are both pretty amazing , basically able to out render the...

For all the short comings(and there are plenty for both cameras)the Nikon A and the GR were very nice cameras. In that size range nothing will produce better results for stills. While many people...

I think that dial can't be dedicated other wise how would you adjust A and S in Manuel mode? I really wish that after three articles they would have clarified the controls a little bit.