-
-
Nice review but the D500 could have been more in the IQ departmnent and still can be, if one can shift a liitle the color balance away yellow/green and can adjust the sharpening balance to give...
-
Hi If you are very used to the D200 way of doing things, then the D500 is more logical. I am not an FX fan as such, I still prefer having a more mobile DSLR sytem with me, but there are other ...
-
Hi Thanks, at 6400, no problems, excellent. At 25600 it's a tad too far.
-
Hi There have been discussions here about the problem with low constrast scenes, the sharpness and detail drops. Maybe you need shoot with a higher contrast settings so the metering and processing ...
-
Hi You should check out the 10-24 lens, it has got good reviews but I use the 12-24 f4 which I am told is optically better, It is an old design but still works well. It would help if Nikon brought ...
-
Hi there The D7100 is great for image quality, large DOF is terrific, though it is not a great allrounder. Nikon seem to struggle with DX Pro perfection. The D500 has some flaws in certain shooting ...
-
Hi Very nice, thank you. I will say that the new camera does produce images that attracts my attention virtually everytime despite one or two technical flaws in the design. I never skip any of ...
-
Hi Thanks for that but he is a FF Fan, pros on other sites have shown that IQ and noise is similar to 810, maybe not quite there against the D750, due to a lack in pixel precision, but it gives the ...
-
Hi Thanks for the comparison and very interesting it is too. There is no significant difference between the two as I see it. The 810 shows more contrast but that's all. I think its just a matter of ...
-
Hi Unless there is something wrong with the D500, I could not imagine why anyone would prefer to use the D750, it simply isn't designed for the fastest movements on stage even up close.
-
Nice shots but those cameras have been around for a while the D500 is still in the teething stage. Right now what people are perceiving as softness is actually down to a lack of pixel precision ...
-
Hi Sorry to butt in, but this forum is a mix, I managed to learn this much.
-
Hi Not an easy one, my inclination would be D750, but it's not always ideal depending what kind of shots you mix. Fast flowing or close up front timing, the D500 would be a good bet as it is a ...
-
Hi Thanks for all the effort, not sure I undertstood everything, but it looks that the D7200 is similar to the D500 on the noise front if not in grain, which in turn is pretty close to a D750. I ...
-
Hi I never understood this argument, if I buy a DX camera instead of FX, it will because of the FOV and DOF, smaller lenses, better wide angles (DOF) plus the reduced need to crop, due to lack of ...
-
Good sell, good story. The subject got priority over the product because the Pen F allows the pictures to flow rather than technically dominate the story. This is why I prefer this type of...
-
Hi I personally would not forget DX wides because I prefer them to the wide performance of FX lenses anyday, simply because, to my eye, the larger DOF has more impact on DX. Mind you, I could do ...
-
3M is a boost ISO so it is not a regular settings.
-
Well let's get something right Dpreview readers were one of the last few campaigning for DX Pro, all the others gave up or had better things to do than lament a hugely popular format, and that...
Activity older than 12 months is not displayed.
|
Total messages |
2084 |
Threads started |
49 |
Last post |
1 week ago |
Total reviews |
2 |
Last review |
Aug 12, 2001 |
|