nwcs

The accuracy mentioned is both for erratically moving targets and in low light situations.

People have been looking for patterns and there are some loose ones. In this case it's been the dealers themselves letting the cat out of the bag. They aren't (yet) under NDA for the sales info ...

Yeah, it is July 2/3. Robert on FujiX forum had it before FR, though. He usually gets that info before nearly anyone else somehow. I'm fully expecting the T2 will be announced the week after the ...

Very easy choice. If you're only going to use one angle of view and are fine with it then stick with the updated X100. If you want more options and capability, get an interchangeable Fuji.

Well, you did ask for critique... I'd stick with color on this one. A portrait crop on just the face would focus the attention on the classic head pose. The eyes are very dark, they should be ...

Minolta 28mm f2.8 MD. Ultra small and slightly wider than normal. Or if you want zoom, then Minolta 35-70 f3.5 zoom. Very nice zoom for the era. Shot quite a few rolls of film with it.

The DR setting is a gimmick really only useful for jpeg shooting. Lightroom partially honors it but I think it's not worth looking at if you're shooting raw. Even if you're shooting jpeg it's not ...

Strangely that is true. Can't imagine why since it is just a different IR cut filter on the sensor. Easily done after-market anyway so it makes even less sense.

Yes, the higher resolution requires better shot discipline. Same as any other high res sensor. Most lenses will show flaws but the detail will still be there.

Probably because at this point they don't need it to build confidence in their system. Of course they also created an expectation by doing it in the first place so maybe they'll do another. Even ...

I have a 14 month old so I feel your pain. One idea is go get a backpack for the kid. My son loves it since he has his hands free to move around and can see all around easily. Otherwise it is a ...

Honestly, though, the 100-400 is a slow aperture zoom. Don't get me wrong, it's good at what it is but it's still fairly slow to go to f8 with a 1.4TC and f11 with 2.0. Not much different than the ...

RIP. Too young in my opinion to pass on. Best wishes to his family. I hope there are some passionate photographers out there who are ready to step into a role as influential as he filled.

It's a bit improved but not drastically. I'd even go so far as to say you won't really notice much difference. The film profiles are handy but I never use them. I either use VSCO or I use my own ...

You can definitely adjust brightness but the color is going to be based upon the film simulation you're using as well as the white balance setting. So it's not quite so simple. Personally, since I ...

Those are very different cameras. I've had quite a variety of cameras from FX on down so I can speak a bit to it. My advice: don't overthink this. It's easy to get bogged down into useless detail. ...

Keep in mind it's weather resistant and not sealed. What it means is a bit of a guess as none of the camera manufacturers provide any concrete measurements using industry standards. Most will only ...

Yes. My Minolta X700 works that way, too. It's fine when you're on film and not changing ISO much (if at all). I don't think it's the best approach for digital. If the X-T2 has an ISO dial with a ...

In the US I would try KEH first. You might also find it in the used section of B&H or Adorama.

You can use afsctool to enable HFS+ compression on Mac OS. https://brkirch.wordpress.com/afsctool/ It's an option anyway.