TN Args

Yours and mine both pretty good 'brews'. :-) Yours: mine.

I must agree with Laurence here. What you are complaining about, @Menneisyys, is primarily due to the way SPP was used for the 2014 test file. K1 Std K1 PSR DP2Q S-HI (39MP) with SPP2014 DP2Q std ...

Very nice thank you. I played Where's Wally but could only find one.

You mean, a mess like this? (standard size DP2 Quattro out of SPP, resized to match K1 size and processed in LR) 100% crop This really doesn't hurt my eyes. But I don't use SPP Standard settings, ...

I'm amazed that DPR devotes so much attention and headlining to these cameras that, one would think, are mainly of interest to heavy duty sports pros and wannabee-pros. The former group of whom,...

I agree. And that's right about pick-a-shot to deal with motion artefacts. Just for fun here is the K1 PSR DNG side-by-side with the camera-generated JPEG from the Olympus E-M5II that also has ...

For Panasonic, they never developed any camera specific profiles like Camera Standard, Camera Neutral, Camera Faithful, etc. You only get Adobe Standard. Olympus was the same until about 1-2 years ...

Bear in mind the pixel shift mode is only for rock-steady subjects and steadied camera, and as such, its most appropriate comparison should be with the new multi-shot HDR mode in the upcoming SD ...

LR produced a specific profile to use the special pixel-shifted raw files from my Olympus E-M5II. It is quite a seamless process and you handle it like any other raw file. I expect they will do ...

That is a hell of a lens. Oops I swore.

It's quite a busy thread, isn't it?

They were also in search of base ISO performance, e.g. higher resolution, less noise or NR artefacts, and cleaner colour. Quattro tech delivers all three.

Well perhaps you can show us what TK hasn't: mixed light photos that are beyond the ability of any m43 camera to get right, but no problem for 'something bigger'.

I really enjoyed that, thank you for the effort. I liked the way you used symmetry in some of them.

I didn't realise that you are the author of the linked review. That last sentence (above) is certainly  a ringing endorsement. The review is very interesting, thanks for doing it. It touches on ...

It has indeed appeared as a review, with all the scorecard tools and Buy Now links that come with an official review, and the little 'camera review' icon that identifies it as a camera review ...

Multi-day (3 days to a week or more) hiking trips with no overnight power are a specialised situation requiring specialised solutions. I don't see why a general-purpose camera should be capable of ...

I totally agree, but you can't blame him too much, since the article discusses Voldemort right at the beginning.

So, are you Ming Thein, or are you the test instrument? Basically, I was descending to your level displayed with your "what else would fans say" put-down. Which I quoted. Including 'vice versa'. ...

Actually, that is exactly why it has less noise. I used to think that, too. This DPR article explains.