tammons

Strong woman = great photo.

IMO consumer mentality drives the market more than anything else and right now Oly is not giving the overall market what it wants. If the consumer market thinks that FF is better, then that is what ...

on DPR almost daily.

I dont understand why Sony does some of the things they do, except it's somewhat obvious that they dont totally understand photographers needs.

Makes total sense to me. Keep MFT as a tiny camera system. People still love it and it has a FF mount. Then add a 36mp + FF mirrorless system, for the improved IQ and that you can share lenses ...

Learn composition first. Most important. Aperture second - and how it relates to depth of field Set your camera on manual, including focus and leave it that way for a couple of months. Then go out ...

I wonder, since the MFT mount is basically a FF mount if it would be possible for Oly or MFT in general, to create a FF camera with a slightly longer register to allow the use of MFT lenses with a ...

MFT and FF mirrorless would easily go hand in hand. Two different uses for two different cameras. That said if FF mirrorless ever gets very very small and the sensor supports a real and useable ...

The Tamron 28-75 F2.8 is pretty light, but as of yet I have not tried it.

They keep MFT for a tiny system and create a FF mirrorless system for the rez and bokeh freaks. Also I think Oly has figured out that they are losing sales because a lot of people want FF ...

LAEA4 is a no brainer > it works. As far as the MC-11 all I can say is I emailed Sigma and asked the question, "will it work properly on the A7RI," and they replied that it would work normally, so ...

Not yet but it is on my list. It's a normal focusing M lens AFAIK.

I doubt it will cover FF. I have tried the Sigma 19,30,60 F2.8 and you have to crop them a lot more than I had hoped. The 60mm works fairly well and you can get more out of oit but you have to ...

I can only guess what a 16-35mm F2.8 would cost, but considering Sony values their lesnes high, I would guess, $2200 for a 16-35mm F2.8. Then all three of the Sony Holy Trinity would cost $7,400. A ...

How about a voightlander 40mm F1.4. Weighs about 6 oz, 1.2" long

No, the cheeks are not blown out. The areas on the girls cheeks are at 91%, 88%, 84%.

I don't see it in my comparisons. Compared to the A7R, the 36mp A7R is ahead of the Xpro2. Mostly tiny fine detail at base ISO. The A7R is about 1.5 - 2 stops ahead the Xpro2 as far as high ISO ...

My opinion is if you don't have much $ then yes go for an LAEA4 and Minolta lenses but really your are better off buying native mount. This is what I have that I kept. Tokina 19-35mm - Pretty nice ...