Emacs23

He's incompetent.

Sorry, that is the lame source.

3×2 was forced format for poors, chosen for price despite being awkward for absolute most purposes: bad for portraits, not wide enough for panoramas.
4×3 is a sane choice, 3×2 was typical brainless...

Yeah. The only difference you need to scale collected info twice large in order to achieve the same output size in case of µ43 vs FF.

The easy solution that will be both faster and easier to use than current state of shlt is touch screen. Panasonic already did this and it works great.

And your point is?

LOL Color accuracy on canons? LOL In reality it was long traded far high ISO performance in canon cameras. Sony itself and newer Nikons are far better in this aspect. And, personally, I have never ...

I doubt a bit about this. Many users of A7 r II suffer from front-back focus, so this can be a PDAF specific issue, not just AF sensor alignment.

Bokeh looks very like blur mode in my android phone. In other words: meh

Good advice was given above: hire a photographer. You can also invest into photography education of some of your stuff, but this won't be soon you will see acceptable quality photos from him/her.

At the cost of colors?
Although that should not be such a huge problem considering how color blinded modern Canon cameras are.

The fix will be called a7 r iii ;)

"Approve" is just a word. They could really approve it, or just saying as if they approved it. No one knows the truth (besides them). Although, considering shining mediocrity of some of these...

@zeisschen

as it was said, panasonic did this and this turned to be quite useful

PS not interested in these anyway: eye level shooting ≡ lame.

This will kill their large sony sonnar 24/1.8, which is outclassed by canon 22/2 in most technical params (being on par in the rest) in 1/3 of price.