Dennis

Sounds like an interesting application and beyond my scope to help ... you might try posting in dpreview's science and technology forum. There's also a DIY and Photo Experiments forum. Good luck, - ...

Something looks wrong with that lens.  Like a black coating has flaked off.  Makes you wonder where it went.  It looks like it could reflect light onto the back surface of a filter and back into ...

Well, I didn't read Davinator's post as being unqualified.  He talked about typical landscapes and prints sizes that APS-C handles well enough.  Even at those print sizes (and even smaller) there ...

Agreed.  I thnk that's where this was headed all along, as I started out by replying to your statement that FF sensors will collect more light, and only objected to the inference (intended or not) ...

You're being presumptious ;) - Dennis -- Gallery at http://kingofthebeasts.smugmug.com

I guess the jury's out as to how well either camera is weather sealed and what lenses are available for either camera if someone cares about weather sealing ... - Dennis -- Gallery at ...

Edited: deleted the serious reply I wasted my time on.  I agree with a previous poster: just an m43 troll. Use the 70-200/4.  It's equivalent to your 40-150/2.8. - Dennis -- Gallery at http://kingo ...

It punches above it's price, to be sure, but I think of the hype surrounding the A6000 as more about mirrorless finally "getting there" than competing with the best of DSLRs.  More like "good ...

Add to D500: weather sealing, dual card slots, more external controls for changing settings w/o taking your eye off the viewfinder, 10fps versus 8fps w/o EVF blackout, vertical control grip, and ...

Nah. It's just a camera. If what you say is true, then it would have a larger buffer :) That's like saying it's major fault is that it's only APS-C. You're complaining that a well known spec isn't ...

You know, sometimes I wonder if the enjoyment that people get out of pixel peeping their images when they PP them isn't the primary rationalization for the majority of FF cameras sold :) I might ...

Nah, Sony has done worse ;) Seriously, though, while Sony's inattention has turned some people off from Sony APS-C, it's probably worth considering that Sony is looking for bang for its r&d buck, ...

Depends on what you're trying to say and how you do it along the way.  All the comparison between APS-C and FF prints shows is that at that print size, there are no significant differences.  Your ...

Assuming you have an equally fast lens for the larger sensor and are willing to use it. The equally fast lens has to be available, affordable, sharp enough and you have to be willing to live with ...

Let's see how the new A6300 performs with the LA-EA3 adapter.  If AF is as good as suggested, I think it points the way to the end of the SLT.  Not the end of A mount, just the end of the ...

Whatever the current technology, sooner or later, you can find it in either size, so you pick a size based on ongoing advantages.  And that's a 1-1.5 stop advantage for FF.  Assuming you can use ...

As long as we're being selfish :) This isn't what I think Sony should necessarily make; rather, what I'd love to see, personally. First up, a 40/1.8. There's already a high end, expensive 55/1.8 so ...

I'm not a Fuji user; just an admirer.  I have a Nikon D7000 and a Sony A6000.  Short term, I'm plugging along with these two - while my daughter is still at home (another 4.5 years till she's off ...

:) I think it's pretty clear at this point that Sony's emphasis is on FE; that's where they're putting their r&d money in an effort to boost sales of profitable products.  Meanwhile, APS-C sells ...