MatsP

A shop here in Stockholm sold an E-M5mkll for 7000sek, that's roughly 750 USD, new but in a "shared box" (they had opened it to sell a kit lens separately). A very good price, all warranties and ...

I liked it when I had it. It has a nice range from ultra-wide to moderate wide, very useful. I wasn't too fond if the collapsible design, but many are, it's about personal taste. I thought it was ...

I was a little ironic, or tried to be. It's a beautiful camera, seriously!

I'm also a bit disappointed by the Pen F which seems to be sold mainly on the looks. But the Pen F will surely be followed by more serious models if I may say so. I got into mft when E-M5 was ...

no yes a grip is nice no yes, definitely doesn't matter much yes to both doesn't seem to be sigificant I'm also wondering. Good questions. Maybe the EM5 II is the answer, as you suggest.

I had the 45/1,8. Avery nice and sharp lens indeed. But to get best sharpness from corner to corner you need to step down to f/4. The same is true for the 12-40 at 40 mm. They are equally sharp ...

Yes 12 mm is wide and as I wrote above I didn't think I would need much more so I sold my 9-18 when I got the excellent 12-40/2.8. Which the 9-18 couldn't match in sharpness. But the 12-40 doesn't ...

I did in fact mention the 9-18 in an earlier post in this thread but wrote that I sold it because I wasn't too content with it but.... ...I must admit though, that this is a nice picture!

I'm glad to hear that price is not an issue for you! If that was true for me I would get both the Samyang and one of the 7-14 zooms. Now I have just the Samyang. As I have an E-M5 I'm most ...

I checked their site but couldn't see anyting like that. Finished already?

Some say that after the 4.0 fw upgrade the E-M1 ibis is on par with E-M5 II. If that's true it even more speaks for the E-M1.

Probably that the pixels used for the PDAF on the EM-1 sensor are used only for that and don't contribute to the picture. They perform as dead pixels but that's taken care of by the software in ...

The issue with the screen on the E-M5 wasn't that it was cracked, just the frame around it. I have that little crack, it's hardly visible and doesn't do any harm at all. The eye-cup has never ...

Best way to save the colours is to digitalise. I always shoot Raw. Only raw. I tried raw+jpeg for a whole but nevery used the jpegs. So I stopped that. Before digital I first shot B&W, developed ...

What I recall is: Pen FT in the 70's, nice and sweet but half frame was limiting. OM-G bought on a trip to US 1984 I think. Didn't like it much, a little too simple. EM-5 since 2012. The best ...

I'm in the same situation. In my country the Pen F is 13000 sek, the E-M5 II is right now 10500 but has been down to 8000 for a short period a while ago and will probably be down thre again quite ...

The E-M5 made m43 a serious alternative for the first time. And with the pro lenses this is even more true. Excellent lenses and an okay sensor make an enough good system together. Better sensors ...

DPR must have tested it as it's possible to compare it to other cameras in the studio scene. Which you can't do with the Pen F yet. A little odd that there's a preview of the Pen F but not of the ...

As a Swede I read Norwegian as easy as I read Swedish (almost anyway). And Dutch is quite easy to understand when reading it, but hardly when it's spoken, for a Swede. Now, that about that, thank ...

I have sold a couple of pictures for publishing in books or newspapers and I have published books with text and pictures by me but I have never sold a printed photo. Only as files. I'm an amateur ...