www.fgks.org   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

ND, or not too ND?

Challenge #39 in the Technology Enabling Art series. Hosted by ProfHankD.
Challenge has finished
Let's see how extreme ND (neutral density) filters compare with stacking using milder or no ND filter. Extreme ND filters cut light enough to allow long, motion-blurring, exposures even in bright daylight, but there is another way: image stacking of shorter exposures. Instead of one 16s exposure, you could stack (average) a rapid sequence of 16 1s exposures using a much lighter ND filter or none at all. Stacking should give higher IQ (e.g., lower noise) without needing the expensive filter. This challenge is to determine if it does... and you should label each submission with number-of-shots@ND-stops, e.g., 2@ND10 would mean two shots with a 10-stop ND filter.
Show full rules
submission
phase has
ended
2 entries
voting
phase has
ended
16 votes
1&ND10 30&NO ND DP
by MarioSS
Click here for full size original image
1st place
4.278
 
low
high
One image of 3 minutes with ND10. 30 images with no ND of 2 seconds taken over 3 minutes time, and stacked with scripts/statistics photoshop tool. My personal preference is to use a neutral density filter.
Camera:
Lens:
Submitted: Thursday, 17th March, 2016 11:46 (GMT)
Taken: Sunday, 13th March, 2016
Focal length: 18 mm
Shutter speed: 183 sec
Aperture: F11
ISO: 200
Notes:
Views: 542
Galleries:
Provide complaint details
Your complaint (along with the complaints of others regarding this entry) will be reviewed by the challenge owner. Depending upon the nature and applicability of the complaint, the entry may be disqualified. In extreme circumstances the user who submitted the entry may receive a ban from the challenge or series in question.
Reason:
Comments:
Saving ...
Complain
Keyboard shortcuts:
p previous n next c challenge f full size r retract vote # vote