km25

The got an 85 from DP, gold and X-PRO2 got an 83, silver. The difference is very little. The A6300 is cheaper, the X-PRO 2 is made better. The A6300 has better AF (?), but the X-Pro 2 has a top ...

YES, The APS size, film film type created by Eastman Kodak is still up there in size. What I was saying is that back in the 1960s and the Nikon F, 35mm was spy camera/some type of travel camera. ...

Years ago, a great deal. The lens were designed at the time for 135, film. If you what true wide angle, one would have work with a crop of 1.6, down to 1.2 to one. The low light made a big ...

It looks as as if the new 24MP in SL handles low light a lot better the 240. It would be very useful in camera like the M. I follow Leica rumors, but hear nothing. I see the 240 coming down price, ...

Nik collect is great. It is easy to use and very intuitive. I lost my program, went to NIK and they had me on file and sent me the whole set, which I had in the first place. For B&W, I love it. PS ...

Hey Doc, got a match. Nice shoot.

The watch is a Rolex, Bolex was a movie camera.The Fuji is a fine camera, with great lens.If you do not like camera OK, but the camera is not a joke, it is a fine piece of photographic tool. With...

The Nikon 105mm f2.5, that was a very sharp lens. This lens looks to be well make, at least in performance. I had a Leica R8 and there 100mm 2.8 micro. I had a picture very close to one you have...

You be getting a a small dig camera to make like image off a forcing screen, it would working being at "B" then you take your image. It be cal. to give you image and exposure of film, buy worki...

Digital maybe able come to rescue, a small sensor , maybe one inch. It would be a camera, to make a picture of a forcing screen. It would be in a light tight box. This would give the photographer a...

I agree. But all the above me would be worth $700.00, the lens selection, The Fuji lens have got great reviews, so you can get the lens in the FL you want, made even rent. The camera is better ...

Well just think of it this way. Camera $1,800.00 and good lens, say even a $1,000.00, few hundred for stuff and hey you can a camera with up there MPs and keep what you have. If the camera get even...

This camera has 425 AF points, 11FPS the action king of mirrorless APS-C's, not with a top speed of 1/4000!

Frist is it that big difference, is more points always better? The Sony was a great AF camera as the 6000, but was it that great of seller. Sport photography just does not seem to a X-PRO 2 strong ...

The XT-1 days are numbered, the X-Pro 2 is great with lens up to maybe the 90mm F2.0, the XT-1 is better with longer lens, it has a vertical grid is balanced and has more hand hold room for the ...

I have owned the X-Pro 1, I have the XT-! and following Fuji lens,
14mm, 23mm, 56mm. The two items I have sold is the X-Pro 1 and the 60mm. Sorry you are wrong. Go count some Megie Pixels.

I will wait for the XT2, but the X-pro 2 is one great camera. The Fuji system is number one in my book. King of the mirrorless! ............oh and it's called balance, of size, weight and ...

The Leica cameras may look better, the lens, the difference is much less. With this new sensor, the real category that Fuji has with Leica is Lens quality. Here, Fuji takes no back seat.
Fuji help...

Yes, but if money is short super 8. Super 8, 16mm, Super 16, 35mm or Panavision. It is matter of money.

I want to see the low light, looks like it will be great.