Bernd Pulverer

@BerndPulverer

Chief Editor, The EMBO Journal | Head of Scientific Publications, EMBO

Heidelberg
embopress.org
Geregistreerd in december 2013
46 foto's en video's Foto's en video's

Tweets

Je hebt @BerndPulverer geblokkeerd

Weet je zeker dat je deze Tweets wilt bekijken? @BerndPulverer wordt niet gedeblokkeerd door Tweets te bekijken.

  1. heeft geretweet
    23 mei

    First time, I learned how to carefully papers from the Peer Review files publicly shared by journals. That helped me discover how top reviewers review papers & improved how I design & conduct experiments and analyze data. Other journals should join! Congrats .

    Congratulations : wonderful to see this on the 10th anniversary of Transparent Peer Review - as a community standard it’ll help achieve referee credit, accountability, training & add expert opinions on exciting data
    1 antwoord 10 retweets 25 vind-ik-leuks
    Ongedaan maken
  2. heeft geretweet
    16 mei

    Today is 's 6th anniversary! Now 1,300 organizations in more than 75 countries, in signing DORA, have publicly committed to improving their practices in research evaluation & to encouraging positive change in research culture. Details here 👇

    32 retweets 34 vind-ik-leuks
    Ongedaan maken
  3. 16 mei

    A governing body to provide guidelines on appropriate use & standards for journal indicators (in coordination with ) is proposed by the workshop 'Rethinking Impact Factors: New Pathways in Journal Metrics' co-organized by

    7 retweets 6 vind-ik-leuks
    Ongedaan maken
  4. heeft geretweet
    16 mei

    Next interation of will allow publication in hybrid journals but costs will not be covered for APCs. Also no embargo, copyright retention by authors and liberal licence etc

    12 retweets 9 vind-ik-leuks
    Ongedaan maken
  5. heeft geretweet
    16 mei

    Policy for open data will follow that for OA in new EU framework program - it will be a contractual obligation for anyone in receipt of a grant

    1 retweet
    Ongedaan maken
  6. 16 mei

    So the EC (and ) as supporters will drop PlanS principle #9? Are the principles subject to change contrary to previous claims?

    The EC will state that you can publish in hybrids - publish where you like - but the costs will not be eligible for EC grantees - regardles of what new guidelines are
    2 retweets
    Ongedaan maken
  7. heeft geretweet
    4 mei

    The future of honest publishing! suggested to share lab notebooks along with publications to increase transparency. —> Now, their recent paper was published together with the lab notebook digest:

    4 retweets 3 vind-ik-leuks
    Ongedaan maken
  8. 2 mei

    . director on 'One of the things this government will not do is to tell researchers where they have to publish...We certainly strongly support open access...We want timely access to the information, data & publications'

    3 retweets 1 vind-ik-leuk
    Ongedaan maken
  9. 2 mei

    2/2....the crucial proviso that sharing useful information in a useful way costs.

    1 retweet 2 vind-ik-leuks
    Deze collectie tonen
    Deze collectie tonen
    Ongedaan maken
  10. 2 mei

    Joint statement by OAinitiatives incl. cOAlitionS & OA2020 laudably adds case for : 'use/re-use by humans&machines' implies data+metadata&open licences ( shares source data on CC-0) Could have added reproducibility (methods!) and..1/2

    1 antwoord 4 retweets 2 vind-ik-leuks
    Deze collectie tonen
    Deze collectie tonen
    Ongedaan maken
  11. 29 apr.

    Consequently, journals from large countries with high national self-citation rates will have disproportionally high JIFs (since these journals will also tend to publish papers form their country of origin).

    3 antwoorden 4 retweets 11 vind-ik-leuks
    Deze collectie tonen
    Deze collectie tonen
    Ongedaan maken
  12. 29 apr.

    Yet another reason to be weary of JIF & citations in general: Larivière & Sugimoto expanded on prelim. findings of surprisingly high rates of national self-citation to show this is a universal attribute of citation networks.

    1 antwoord 49 retweets 53 vind-ik-leuks
    Deze collectie tonen
    Deze collectie tonen
    Ongedaan maken
  13. 3 apr.

    misleadingly peddling jnl. metrics has become expensive: 50mil$ injunction v. OMICS for 'misrepresentations re. publ. practices...O. is restrained...from making any representation regarding the IF'. Will others now tone down their peddling?

    4 retweets 2 vind-ik-leuks
    Ongedaan maken
  14. 26 mrt.

    112.5mil.$ settlement for misappropriated US federal research funds - but is it justified to divest 33mil. tax payer money to the whistle blower? Will this not incentivize vigilantism? Need to protect whistle blowers not make it lucrative

    1 retweet 1 vind-ik-leuk
    Ongedaan maken
  15. 22 mrt.

    Hypercreative new way to display negative data, fresh out of our daily image aberration screen .

    1 antwoord 3 retweets 10 vind-ik-leuks
    Ongedaan maken
  16. 21 mrt.

    Karen Vousden's balanced assessment of the impact on Brexit on research in the UK in is well worth a read as the last days to March 29th slip by. Elsewhere the funding prognosis is seen more nervously e.g.

    Looking beyond current uncertainty, our Chief Scientist writes about the critical importance of international collaboration for research progress, and our priorities for negotiations.
    2 retweets 4 vind-ik-leuks
    Ongedaan maken
  17. 12 mrt.

    Platform migration waves , & : correlation or causation?

    2 antwoorden 12 retweets 16 vind-ik-leuks
    Ongedaan maken
  18. 11 mrt.

    'The perception is that there are technical barriers to achieving openness whereas the challenges are predominantly cultural...being open [should] provide a bigger payoff. Part of that will come out of ” says of

    5 vind-ik-leuks
    Ongedaan maken
  19. 11 mrt.

    . needs to lead in standardization: 'Ideally this would lead to a framework that allows stakeholders to adopt a standardized set of Open Access requirements that are internally consistent' says of .

    2 retweets 3 vind-ik-leuks
    Ongedaan maken
  20. 10 mrt.

    . & are synonymous no more: Swed. funder decided 'it cannot support Plan S in its current form' as 'Plan S needs to be more flexible & discussed openly with the community' but remains in to support

    13 retweets 6 vind-ik-leuks
    Ongedaan maken

@BerndPulverer heeft nog niet getweet.

Het laden lijkt wat langer te duren.

Twitter is mogelijk overbelast of ondervindt een tijdelijke onderbreking. Probeer het opnieuw of bekijk de Twitter-status voor meer informatie.

    Je bent misschien ook geïnteresseerd in

    ·