-
First, I don't see the difference you are talking about, but everyone is different. The different aspect ratio may have something to do with the perception. Second, the images are going to be ...
-
Why are so many dpreview posters so aggressivly argumentative? He didn't say 30fps video was smooth. He said 60fps was smooth. So you are disagreeing with something he didn't say. Now you are ...
-
Why wait? The add-on EVF (an engineering marvel) is available on this version. They're still working on the burst rate and buffer depth...
-
But do any of us really know why we are doing what we're doing? Aren't we all conditioned by a confusing tangle of expectations, ambitions, desires and possibilities (real and imagined) that lead...
-
Yes, and it's a shame. Love Canon color and IQ over the years. When I first heard about this camera, I was really excited because it looked like an out-of-the-park home run. But it's more like...
-
So sad. Some incredible features. But: EVF is an add-on. More money, more bulk. Burst is a joke. Buffer for JPEG is about 1.5 seconds worth of frames. RAW burst is less than 1fps. Most people...
-
Self-promoting spam. For shame.
-
Here are the original images. You can try it yourself. 300mm, 16mp 300mm, 8mp sensor crop
-
With sensor crop "zoom" a reduction to 50% resolution gives ~1.4x; further reduction by another 50% gives ~2x. So a 16mp camera at a 2x sensor crop "zoom" yields a 4mp image. 14x sensor crop ...
-
Many people who shoot at great distances are trying to figure out ways to get more reach without breaking the bank. Is sensor-crop "zoom" a good solution? I have been shooting with the GX7 for a ...
-
Great. So give Kodak a display case in the Photography Hall of Fame. Then we can all go out and take pictures with cameras that offer far more today. And no one is giving a "lousy response to...
-
Nostalgia is great but now is now, and either the products are better or they aren't.
-
Agree about the price; wait 6 months and get a used one much cheaper. As for xx-300mm, the Lumix 100-300mm works great. It is half the weight and a fraction of the price of the 100-400mm. But if...
-
This lens is a welcome addition, although it weighs almost twice as much as the 100-300mm, and costs 2-3 times more. But one can always wait six months and pick up a good used one much cheaper...
-
One month later, and the link is still the same. GIGO.
-
When I click the link that says: "View our hands-on preview of the Panasonic Leica DG 100-400mm F3.5-5.6" I am directed to the Lumix zs100...
-
BTW here is a good source for comparing several common TCs: http://www.cs.mtu.edu/~shene/DigiCam/User-Guide/FZ-30/Converters/Lenses/Telephoto.html
-
That's my plan, but I want to start specific research now. That would be a pleasant surprise. With the a5000/a6000, there's a huge difference. For example, DxOMark rated the SEL24240 at an overfall ...
-
Thanks. I'm not normally a fan of TCs but if this one is good it may do the trick. I'll look into it. If it works with the 24-240 I may try that combination.
-
True, but it's also a lot less than 600mm eq. Yes. In fact ~800mm would be better. I mentioned sensor crop zoom as an aside. If I shoot with the Sony 200mm on APS-C, I'm getting 300mm eq, which ...
Activity older than 12 months is not displayed.
|
Kawika Nui has not added any gear yet.
Total messages |
481 |
Threads started |
51 |
Last post |
4 weeks ago |
Photos uploaded |
2 |
Last upload |
Feb 17, 2012 |
|