Reviews written by registered user
|
| 905 reviews in total |
Acclaimed by the French film critics and much later rediscovered in
America, Otto Preminger's "Bonjour tristesse" is a film which offers
much to admire. It's exquisitely directed, as Preminger seems to pay
utmost attention to the framing of each shot and the minutia of every
sequence. The setting of the French Rivera in particular was a great
choice which always looks absolutely gorgeous, and Preminger certainly
knows how to capture it's essence. Additionally, the screenplay, while
very melodramatic, touches upon many themes considered taboo at the
time. The central relationship between Cecile, her father, and
potential step-mother is just drenched in Freudian symbolism. The
offbeat structure of black and white for present and color for past is
obvious but interesting.
Still, the film is overall unsuccessful for the reason that I've seen
far too many films about rich people with problems. If one of these
melodramas is going to work, you need characters capable of gaining the
audience's sympathy as they probably will be unable to relate to their
lifestyle. Douglas Sirk understood this whereas unfortunately Preminger
seems to not. One can see tragedy coming throughout the film, yet you
never exactly feel for either David Niven or Jean Seberg. In
particular, Seberg's character is an unlikable brat incapable of
dealing with not having things always go her way. This may have been
what Preminger was driving at, but it never makes her pleasant to
watch. "Bonjour tristesse" is well made, enjoyably offbeat, but I
ultimately didn't care what happened to the characters. (7/10)
Having Sherlock Holmes and Jack the Ripper meet is a rather obvious concept, given both being legendary figures of the period (albeit one fictional and the other one not). Additionally, the idea has been done better since, namely in "Murder By Decree" in 1979. Still, "A Study in Terror" is a fun if rather forgettable meeting of the two characters. The two main things it has going for it are the performances and the atmosphere. As Sherlock Holmes, John Neville is absolutely perfect, managing the right combination of wit and seemingly super-human intelligence. Teaming up with him is Donald Houston as Watson, whom avoids overtly bumbling and proves an admirable partner. Plus, the film has a great look, a color yet fog-drenched setting resembling Mario Bava's work from the period and often lending the feel of a horror film. Still, the film has an exploitative current, often featuring attractive women in low cut dresses being brutally murdered, which can admittedly be fun, but often feels used as an excuse for an intriguing mystery, which unfortunately this film ultimately lacks. Overall, this is a fun way to kill an hour and a half, but never reaches the heights the appealing central concept should have. (6/10)
Sure, it's really arty and a bit on the slow side, but if you have the
patience, "Stalker" could very well be one of the most effective film
going experiences you'll ever have. Ostentatiously a science fiction
film, it lacks any of the flashy effects or campy histrionics the
genre's detractors often associate it with. Instead, Andrei Tarkovsky
crafts his work as yet another one of his metaphysical journeys, a
completely cerebral film open to a plethora of interpretations. Several
viewings later, I'm still not exactly sure what "Stalker" is ultimately
about, but I love revisiting it in order to attempt to decipher it.
Often, the film deals with man's lack of faith and willingness to
venture into uncharted territories. Many times, when they do, it's for
their own ulterior motives opposed to their own personal betterment.
Since the film touches upon faith, it seems rather ironic to scan
yourself for a quick and easy interpretation, as Tarkovsky was known to
reject such. Certainly a film more to be experienced than exactly
understood, "Stalker" bears repeated viewings. Past it's depth, it's a
technically exception work, one without any mistakes along the way.
(10/10)
There's nothing wrong with a film being low-key, as a sense of subtlety
can force the viewers to draw their own inferences from the story and
ultimately walk away more affected, with both the films of John
Cassavetes and Robert Altman being prime examples. However, sometimes a
film can be too low-key and nuanced that it never particularly involves
the audience. "Mikey and Nicky" unfortunately did that for me. Director
Elaine May never seems able to decide exactly what she wants the film
to be, with it's tone often wavering between quirky character study,
buddy comedy, and crime thriller. All this would be fine, but
unfortunately the two title characters are never particularly likable.
Both of them are considerably misogynistic (oddly enough for a film
from a female director) and entirely at fault for the situations
present, with Nicky being rather psychotic. The film does have some
interesting points to make on the subjects of loyalty, but none of the
characters remain truthful to one another.
Still, the film remains watchable for several reasons. It's definitely
an interesting failure, as May tried, no matter how muddled the result,
to craft something intelligent and different, so that should be
respected no matter what. Unfortunately, as a director she seems far
too derivative of Cassavetes, who stars. The main thing "Mikey and
Nicky" has going for it is some great acting. Peter Falk and Cassavetes
were both always compelling if often underrated leading men, and the
supporting cast has some interesting choices (from Ned Beatty to
William Hickey to Joyce Van Patten and even a young M. Emmet Walsh),
even if they're often given little to do. Unfortunately, the film in
the end lacks any real impact, making the whole venture seem rather
pointless. (6/10)
I've seen a lot of bad and trashy movies, and overtime have acquired both a taste and a tolerance for many. When my friend told me he had a copy of this flick, I thought it sounded like a passable if nothing special slice of sexploitation. When we started watching it and I saw the "Troma" logo though, I knew it was gonna be bad. However, nothing could've prepared me for the sheer ineptitude of the film. Its not so much that it fails as cinema, that I really didn't care about, but it doesn't manage to be even remotely entertaining. Given the plot of a group of sexy nurses wearing lingerie with machine guns who seduce and murder men, you'd think this would be somewhat enjoyable. However, the "filmmakers" manage to make it anything but. There's next to zero nudity, which is disappointing because the cast is admittedly very attractive. The film only runs for a scant seventy-five minutes, but it feels longer than "Shoah". This is probably because every scene is stretched out to at least three times the length it should have been. The worst is the psychedelic go-go dance, where all the nurses sit around with one stripping as kaleidescope visuals appear on screen. This sounds like fun, but it manages to go on for about twenty minutes. Also, the narration attempts to camp it up, but merely bores with the monotone and cliché lines. Apparently there is an even longer version which Troma cut up, but I shudder to imagine what that'd be like, given how painful it is in its current form. Don't let the promising concept fool you. This manages to be the single worst film Troma has ever slapped its name on, and you know that's saying a whole lot. (1/10)
"She-Mob" is one of the most entertainingly bad movies ever made. Sure,
its incompetently made, but it has that special and rare sort of
ineptitude that crosses the line over into surrealism. Like the works
of Ed Wood or Phil Tucker, when one watches this you must wonder how it
could've possibly been made by a sane mind. Its so filled with a lack
of continuity, utterly unappealing nudity, and an overall lack of
intelligence that I'd be surprised if even drive-in audiences at the
time took it remotely seriously. However, it remains immortal as a
trash classic, a film which screams for a bigger cult following than it
has at the moment.
The plot revolves around Big Shim, a vicious metal-bra wearing butch,
who escapes from prison with her gang of female cohorts. To get some
cash, they kidnap a gigolo who's currently shacked up with a wealthy
socialite. They subject him to brutal torture such as having to make
love to them all. The socialite gets wind of all this, but instead of
giving into the She-Mob, she hires a female private eye named Sweety
East, a cross between Honey West and Brigitte Bardot with some
overpowering Divine-style eyelashes. Eventually the gigolo escapes with
Big Shim's female toy, but finds he's only beginning to endure the
wrath of the She-Mob.
This slice of sexploitation insanity is obviously impossible to take
seriously, but a whole lot of fun. The She-Mob themselves are actually
decent looking (aside from Big Shim), despite the obvious breast
implants (rather surprising given the era the film was made) on one of
them. The dialog is often outrageous as well ("I want you to know my
tits are as hard as my heart!"), and there's even some nice graphic
violence. The film is full of great sleaze atmosphere and over-the-top
acting, that it never once becomes boring. A must-see for exploitation
fans. (8/10)
To be honest, "In the Folds of the Flesh" doesn't exactly have a coherent or compelling murder mystery storyline. If that's what you're looking for, there's much better Giallos out there, such as "Don't Torture a Duckling" or "The Bird With the Crystal Plumage". However, if you're a fan of swinging European exploitation flicks with a touch of psychedelics for extra flavoring, than you're bound to enjoy this little treat. The plot, as mentioned, is a bit confusing. There is a story, but its rather difficult to piece together and has many holes. It involves a murderer on the run from the law who thinks he sees a body being buried in a wealthy socialite's backyard. Thirteen years later, he returns to attempt to get money out of her in order to not hand her over to the police. However, the socialite and her son and daughter are a bit depraved themselves, taking pleasure in incest and even murder. The plot goes several directions from this point on, including the father of the household possibly returning and another sister who went insane. The story isn't what matters here. What is important is the sheer amount of sleaze on display. In addition to the aforementioned incest, there's also decapitations, schizophrenia, rape, and plenty of other delights along those lines. It even veers into Nazisploitation for a few moments, with a character having flashbacks to a concentration camp. Its never remotely disturbing, just very distasteful. I also enjoyed seeing Pier Angeli and Eleanora Rossi-Drago playing a daughter and mother, because its obvious they're only a few years apart in age. If you're looking for a compelling murder mystery, look elsewhere. However, if you want a slice of stylish, pretentious, and weird European sleaze, than you'll enjoy this. (7/10)
"Our Hitler: A Film From Germany" is one of the most stunning film
experiences I've had, one that completely transcends the medium and its
supposed limitations. If you've ever wondered how an entire nation
could be duped by Hitler into his twisted philosophy, than watch this
film. It paints a more accurate portrayal of the mindset than any other
work possibly could. Also, the structure and style is very innovative,
completely different from anything else I've seen. Director Hans-Jürgen
Syberberg combines lengthy monologues from both real figures and
fictional characters, rear screen projection of both film and stills,
theatrical settings, and even puppetry. This all seems rather absurd,
but it works well to create a colorful and surreal nightmare.
The acting could be criticized as being campy, and I'll admit its done
in a very theatrical manner. I had no problem with this aspect for
several reasons. First off, the film often resembles a filmed
performance, so the play style acting fit it well. Additionally, when
crafting a portrait of madness on such a wide scale, its only
appropriate to get a little crazy yourself.
This all boils down to one question however - is it worth watching a
nearly eight hour German art film about Hitler? The answer is yes, but
only for some. If you are interested in learning how the German public
viewed the man, than this is absolutely mandatory viewing. If you are a
hardened cinephile who wants to see how far the limitations of standard
narrative cinema can be stretched and deconstructed, than "Our Hitler"
will be a memorable experience unlike any other. If the admittedly
massive length seems a bit too much for one sitting, the film is broken
into four parts, so it's alright to watch it in several intervals.
(10/10)
Bruno Mattei was possibly the most worthless of all the European
horror-exploitation filmmakers. He lacked the style of Jess Franco or
the intelligence of Jean Rollin and really had little to offer. Films
such as "Rats: Night of Terror" and "Hell of the Living Dead" aren't so
good they're bad, they're simply unbearably inept. Before viewing "The
Other Hell", I expected the absolute worst nunsploitation flick out
there. Surprisingly, it was moderately enjoyable. Its still one of the
weakest films in the bizarre subgenre I've seen, but there were enough
enjoyably trashy moments I was entertained. The plot itself had enough
holes to drive a Hummer through and didn't make a bit of sense, but it
made the film a nicely disorienting experience. Also, the gore
sequences were laughable but in a good way.
Still, this is far from being a trash classic. Mattei was the single
dullest director imaginable, so the picture's pacing is highly uneven.
There are a few dull stretches. Also, Mattei has demonstrated in the
past that he loves killing animals for our "entertainment". While I can
overlook this if the film itself is good (such as "Cannibal Holocaust"
or "Cockfighter"), but with schlock like this I find it rather
inexcusable. However, worst of all, is that there's little nudity or
even attractive females. When I see a nunsploitation film, I'd
generally expect some attractive convent sisters in little to no
clothing. Bruno Mattei, for his love of any other exploitable element,
shows restraint here. All in all, "The Other Hell" isn't as bad as I
expected and worth maybe a rental for trash fans. (5/10)
4 out of 6 people found the following review useful:
I've said it countless times before, but I'm always astonished at just
how many fantastic film from the 70s are close to being forgotten
today. Maybe it's because this was an era of filmmakers taking risks
and studio heads allowing them to do so, but I'm consistently impressed
by the huge number of mature and intelligent films turned out,
especially compared to the 1980s. "Buffalo Bill and the Indians" is one
of the many regretfully underrated films from the time. Coming hot off
the commercial and critical success of "Nashville", Altman offered up
this satire on the American entertainment industry and the manner in
which we view our heroes. Maybe since it was released in the
bicentennial, America didn't want to see such a cynical portrayal of an
American icon. The film flopped and received very mixed reviews from
the critics.
The fact it wasn't well regarded upon initial release and is largely
forgotten today is a complete shame, because it really is one of
Altman's finest works. The dialog is scorching and complements the
satirical nature of the plot very well. The acting by everyone involved
is superb. Paul Newman, known for playing likable anti-heroes, is
rather cast against type as a charming but ultimately pathetic Bill
Cody. Also worth mentioning is Harvey Keitel, also playing against
type, as Cody's meek nephew. Despite all the great performances,
another reason this may have flopped was the lack of likable
characters. "MASH" and "Nashville" at least offered sympathetic
protagonists, but the people in "Buffalo Bill and the Indians" are
likely to sicken the viewer for the most part. Still, it only serves to
drive the cynical themes home. "Buffalo Bill and the Indians" is an
overlooked masterpiece. (9/10)
Page 1 of 91: | [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] |