Sony A6300 vs Fujifilm X-Pro2

Christof21 wrote:

Brandless1 wrote:

Camera Lab has ran side by side resolution/noise comparison. It thought it is interesting read..Here is the link:

http://www.cameralabs.com/reviews/Sony_Alpha_A6300/outdoor_resolution.shtml

It is a very unhonest comparison. (for the reasons already mentionned by a previous answer).

- The Sony lenses are at their lower limit when shooting at 16mm (16-50, 16-70), where we do not expect the best results. 16mm is close to the middle range of the 10-24.

Uh, most zoom lenses are at their sharpest at their widest setting and degrade as the FL increases. This certainly is true for the Fuji 10-24 as 10mm is it's best FL and 24 is where it's at it's worst.  This would give the advantage to the CZ Sony.

- The sony lenses have a wider zoom range

True

- The 10-24 is an expensive lens.

About the same price as the CZ Sony used in the comparison.

The 16mm is a wide angle focal length and needs a wide angle lens.

?????

The credibility of cameralabs is collapsing when I read such a biased review.

Read the post of the reviewer further down in the thread. I think his review is fine and should be taken as just more information.

Bob