MarcLee

I must say watching you two guys trying to justify trashing other people's work, or even brands, with zero accountability, is hysterical.

The original comment here holds broadly true.

It is...

If size is all that matters, many will be happy with their smartphone. There are also other issues like Raw, colors, user interface, comfort in hand, etc etc.

One error. One lack of mention:

Yes, there IS 23.98p Full HD video, which is the US-friendly equivalent of 24P.

There is a very usable ECO mode which gives you battery life of around 310 shots,...

A rarely trollish post even for this part of the world. Perhaps next time you could try actually reading the review.

Well, if you like "argument from authority", Sebastião Salgado shot Canon on his "Genesis" project, as does Yann Arthus-Bertrand. "Photoman" does not. Obviously Photoman is the one we should be...

Everlasting, that is a defence of ALL clickbait everywhere.

There are cameras with the same size sensor and at least 120mm equivalent lenses, so it IS possible. This doesn't even go to a decent portrait focal length which, for me, is the biggest shortcoming.

... and the same people justifying not having one will consider it the best thing since sliced bread when Sony finally introduces it.

Son House, Bukka White, R.L Burnside, and Buddy Guy are all cool. They are just not all there is. And nor is everything after them rubbish. (Incidentally, you didn't initially say they were...

I am just laughing at how different the comments would likely be, from some DPR staff as well as others, if the headline was "Sony's multi-purpose ME20F-SH camera reaches ISO 4 million".

Tedious...

Not a Sony, eh?

You are missing my obvious point, which is that when you shoot them side by side on the same day in the same conditions different cameras give you different results. And the processing choices...

Precisely my point. Laptop, iPhone, and iPad screens are usually not calibrated but tuned for extra contrast. On my calibrated monitors it is a different story.

It is not only those photos. It's something I see otherwise excellent shooters like Philip Bloom fall into, even processing for it.

But I see I have committed blasphemy.

Drab images in the name of high dynamic range, particularly on the beach front photos.

It's a trend I am seeing more and more. Everything grey. No snap.

I have a theory some of it is considered...

I'm not talking about the Stones, who are great, but the commenters who are still back there.

Maybe that's what most people actually photograph.

... or you could use your eyes and look at the photos.

Let me guess. Early sixties?

I love how people think their lack of knowledge is something to be proud of on the internet.

Neither the band, nor Dave Grohl, is exactly unknown. You may have heard of a band called Nirvana....