texinwien

I think you may be right here. I don't own an E-P5, so I can't say for sure, and I'm having a hard time confirming the details online. The feature does work in low speed continuous mode on newer ...

I own one Olympus (OMD E-M5II) and one Panasonic (GM5), and I owned the original E-M5 before upgrading to the newer model. In the interest of openness, I owned the original E-M5 for some time ...

Servus! I'm almost certain it does. It does on my E-M5 II, and I can't think of any reason why it wouldn't work in P mode or any other mode, for that matter. At least on my E-M5 II, it works in the ...

You didn't trick me, you lied, and I'm not angry - sorry to burst your bubble. You were not totally honest. You've lied at least twice in this discussion. You lied about using a flash, and you lied ...

Right - first you accuse me of having reading comprehension problems, then you accuse me of arrogance when I point out that it's actually you with the problem. You make zero sense. No backpedalling ...

Nope, that would be you - you can't even seem to understand six words written by Olympus: reduce blur caused by shutter impact . Olympus' own description of the Anti-Shock feature added to the E-P5 ...

I sent my EM5 in for service from Austria. They had it back to me, completely fixed, within 2 weeks. They even fixed a couple of things for free that were definitely not warranty issues. I was ...

So you admit to being dishonest - great start. That is absolutely incorrect. There is plenty of difference between the two photos that has nothing to do with shot noise. I cropped, straightened and ...

You can't say that with certainty - he used a flash, and that invalidates the test, since a flash will freeze motion. Furthermore, there is a visible difference between the two samples.

While I agree that the difference in sensor shape will result in an m43 lens having a slightly narrower horizontal AOV than an equivalent lens on a 3:2 format, I don't think the difference is ...

As I said in the post you responded to, "the EM5 certainly suffers from it (in some scenarios, with some lenses, with some ways of holding the camera and with, perhaps, differences due to sample ...

On in first, off in second (posting this to make sure it's clear that I made my edit before Rusk answered my post). And just a word about my guess - I'm going off of the fact that the highlights ...

It's off in the second one, on in the first. (edited, and just a guess - the test needs to be redone without using a flash) However, you need to redo the test without using a flash, since the flash ...

Thanks for sharing your excellent examples. I've performed numerous shutter shock tests , mostly with my E-M5 II, since I can choose to capture photos with the full mechanical shutter, the ...

It may be that only a small minority notices SS. Many who claim to have never seen it change their tune after performing the correct kinds of controlled tests. Your gear list and galleries are ...

I haven't suggested that his current issues with the EP5 are related to shutter shock, so your question is irrelevant. What is beyond laughable is your insistence on sticking to your guns in the ...

What version of firmware are you using, and have you been using 0-second anti shock? I'm not sure whether the two images suffer from shutter shock - am not on my PC. They're still not the best sort ...

Read the review. DPReview also mentions the 0-second anti-shock feature that Olympus released fit the EP5 in firmware version 1.4. That feature largely makes shutter shock a thing of the past on ...

You must have missed the memo. As far as I know, the EP5 review was the first time DPReview mentioned shutter shock in a review. The EP5 was also the first camera that Olympus added the 0-second ...

(1) Are you using the 0-second anti shock feature that was added to the EP-5 in a firmware update? (2) Is ...