This page works best with JavaScript. Disabling it will result in some disabled or missing features. You can still see all customer reviews for the product.
There was a problem filtering reviews right now. Please try again later.
on March 5, 2016
I have a couple of X-Pro 1 cameras. I love the hybrid viewfinder, and something about the design of the X-Pro has resulted in the camera taking some of the best photos I've ever made. But the EVF on the X-Pro 1 is very dated - the X-T1 and X-E2 are tremendously better.
The X-Pro 2 is phenomenal. The EVF is outstanding. As seamless as the X-T1 in just not feeling like you are looking at a projection of an image. The diopter adjustment makes a big difference to me. And I can finally sell my Canon 5D MkIII. And recover the cost of this camera. Because 24 MP sensor.
The X-Pro 2 is phenomenal. The EVF is outstanding. As seamless as the X-T1 in just not feeling like you are looking at a projection of an image. The diopter adjustment makes a big difference to me. And I can finally sell my Canon 5D MkIII. And recover the cost of this camera. Because 24 MP sensor.
on March 9, 2016
I am a hobbyist photographer focused mainly on capturing everyday imagery: family, travel, architecture, and the like. I've used mirrorless cameras since their inception, snapping up a Panasonic Lumix DMC-G1 when it was released. When Fujifilm announced its entry into the space, I was attracted to the larger APS-C sensor, the JPEG quality (I can't be bothered to post-process), and the promise of a more analog feel (my Micro Four Thirds cameras felt a little too automated to keep me interested in the creative process). I jumped on the X-E1 and later upgraded to the X-T1. I own a handful of Fujinon lenses, including the 18-55mm, 23mm, 35mm f/1.4 and f/2, and 56mm (non-APD version).
I prefer rangefinder-style bodies for aesthetic reasons, but the X-Pro2's body feels a little large in my small-ish hands; I think I prefer the size of the X-T1. That said, I can still easily hold it with one hand, and I appreciate its solid feel. I also miss the X-T1's EVF. As a glasses-wearer, the smaller hybrid viewfinder is a little tougher to see. Nevertheless, the camera feels very refined: the build is solid, the controls fall nicely under my fingers, and the haptics are spot on (the exposure compensation dial, in particular, has the perfect amount of resistance).
I moved from the X-T1 to the X-Pro2 for three primary reasons: the 24 megapixel X-Trans III sensor, the ACROS film simulation, and the 1/8000 shutter speed. To my eyes, image quality is very similar to the X-T1 with the added benefit of additional cropping latitude--exactly what I was hoping for. I'm also really enjoying the Acros film simulation. It seems a little more contrasty than the standard monochrome simulation, and the film grain effect adds a new dimension to printed photos. Finally having a 1/8000 shutter speed has already proven useful for outdoor shooting with fast lenses (I'd rather not have to carry ND filters). Overall, for a JPEG shooter like myself, the X-Pro2's image quality and tweak-ability is a dream come true.
Unfortunately, autofocus speed does not seem significantly improved to me, even with the new Fujinon XF35mm F2 R WR. Fujifilm did a nice job explaining the X-Pro2's autofocus and associated limitations on its web site (in brief: a handful of lenses, like the new 35mm, use a newer chip that enables quicker autofocus), but I was still hoping to see some additional speed. When shooting young kids, I can't help but feel that my Olympus OM-D E-M1 is subjectively quicker in single-shot autofocus mode. The speed is certainly not a deal-breaker, and for most use cases it's more than sufficient, but it's an area where Fujifilm can continue to improve.
[Update] After spending a little more time with the camera, I'd like to point out two additional features that I've enjoyed. First, the grain effect for JPEGs. I initially thought this might be a gimmick--and, indeed, it might be--but I've found that dialing in some weak grain provides a nice microcontrast-like effect, especially when used in conjunction with the classic chrome film simulation. Second, the dual SD card slot. I have the camera set to record RAWs to one card and JPEGs to the other. That way I can tweak images in-camera using the built-in RAW converter, but easily transfer only the JPEGs to my computer. It also gives me a backup in case one of the cards should fail (something that's only happened to me once).
In sum, the Fujifilm X-Pro2 provides a very refined experience: a solid and evolved physical package that produces beautiful image quality. I'm most happy with the X-Pro2, and I look forward to continuing to get to know it.
I prefer rangefinder-style bodies for aesthetic reasons, but the X-Pro2's body feels a little large in my small-ish hands; I think I prefer the size of the X-T1. That said, I can still easily hold it with one hand, and I appreciate its solid feel. I also miss the X-T1's EVF. As a glasses-wearer, the smaller hybrid viewfinder is a little tougher to see. Nevertheless, the camera feels very refined: the build is solid, the controls fall nicely under my fingers, and the haptics are spot on (the exposure compensation dial, in particular, has the perfect amount of resistance).
I moved from the X-T1 to the X-Pro2 for three primary reasons: the 24 megapixel X-Trans III sensor, the ACROS film simulation, and the 1/8000 shutter speed. To my eyes, image quality is very similar to the X-T1 with the added benefit of additional cropping latitude--exactly what I was hoping for. I'm also really enjoying the Acros film simulation. It seems a little more contrasty than the standard monochrome simulation, and the film grain effect adds a new dimension to printed photos. Finally having a 1/8000 shutter speed has already proven useful for outdoor shooting with fast lenses (I'd rather not have to carry ND filters). Overall, for a JPEG shooter like myself, the X-Pro2's image quality and tweak-ability is a dream come true.
Unfortunately, autofocus speed does not seem significantly improved to me, even with the new Fujinon XF35mm F2 R WR. Fujifilm did a nice job explaining the X-Pro2's autofocus and associated limitations on its web site (in brief: a handful of lenses, like the new 35mm, use a newer chip that enables quicker autofocus), but I was still hoping to see some additional speed. When shooting young kids, I can't help but feel that my Olympus OM-D E-M1 is subjectively quicker in single-shot autofocus mode. The speed is certainly not a deal-breaker, and for most use cases it's more than sufficient, but it's an area where Fujifilm can continue to improve.
[Update] After spending a little more time with the camera, I'd like to point out two additional features that I've enjoyed. First, the grain effect for JPEGs. I initially thought this might be a gimmick--and, indeed, it might be--but I've found that dialing in some weak grain provides a nice microcontrast-like effect, especially when used in conjunction with the classic chrome film simulation. Second, the dual SD card slot. I have the camera set to record RAWs to one card and JPEGs to the other. That way I can tweak images in-camera using the built-in RAW converter, but easily transfer only the JPEGs to my computer. It also gives me a backup in case one of the cards should fail (something that's only happened to me once).
In sum, the Fujifilm X-Pro2 provides a very refined experience: a solid and evolved physical package that produces beautiful image quality. I'm most happy with the X-Pro2, and I look forward to continuing to get to know it.
on March 16, 2016
I've had my X-Pro2 for almost two weeks now, and absolutely love it. I've been plagued by on-call for work, and now I appear to have a bad cold, so I haven't been able to put it through all of the paces I wanted to, but what I've seen so far, I really like.
Pros:
- Fits my hands very well
- With the XF35mm f/2 lens, is a fairly compact and light weight kit
- Hybrid EVF/OVF is nothing short of outstanding
- Appears to be built like a tank
- Is very responsive
- Top-mounted controls are easy to learn and use, without taking your eye away from the view finder
- Image quality is outstanding
- Acros film simulation. What can I say except "Wow!"
- Focus point joystick is brilliant, and is extremely easy to use
- Auto focus is fast and sure
Cons:
- Battery life could be a bit better
I bought into the X-Pro2 knowing full well it didn't have 4K capabilities, and I'm more than good with that. I also figured this camera might not be a sports photographer's dream camera. I do know it is a fantastic street and portrait photographer's camera, and probably a wedding photographer's camera as well. I also feel it will be a good landscape camera, but won't know for sure until I can get outside.
Anybody who is going to drop this much money on a camera body should do their research ahead of time, and make sure it fits your particular style of photography. It fits mine very well, and I see my Canon kit slowly getting sold off in the near future.
In addition to their fine camera bodies and lenses, I also admire Fujifilm's commitment to it's users, by providing firmware updates to fix issues, and also to extend the capabilities of their cameras.
Pros:
- Fits my hands very well
- With the XF35mm f/2 lens, is a fairly compact and light weight kit
- Hybrid EVF/OVF is nothing short of outstanding
- Appears to be built like a tank
- Is very responsive
- Top-mounted controls are easy to learn and use, without taking your eye away from the view finder
- Image quality is outstanding
- Acros film simulation. What can I say except "Wow!"
- Focus point joystick is brilliant, and is extremely easy to use
- Auto focus is fast and sure
Cons:
- Battery life could be a bit better
I bought into the X-Pro2 knowing full well it didn't have 4K capabilities, and I'm more than good with that. I also figured this camera might not be a sports photographer's dream camera. I do know it is a fantastic street and portrait photographer's camera, and probably a wedding photographer's camera as well. I also feel it will be a good landscape camera, but won't know for sure until I can get outside.
Anybody who is going to drop this much money on a camera body should do their research ahead of time, and make sure it fits your particular style of photography. It fits mine very well, and I see my Canon kit slowly getting sold off in the near future.
In addition to their fine camera bodies and lenses, I also admire Fujifilm's commitment to it's users, by providing firmware updates to fix issues, and also to extend the capabilities of their cameras.
on March 13, 2016
I wish Fuji would have come out with this camera originally and I would have replaced my Canon 5D Mark III 2 years ago. This camera is fast, responsive and the added features of dual card slots, focus point joystick and center weighted metering are the features that were needed for Fuji to compete with other professional cameras. They dynamic range is so much better than my Canon and finally the fast autofocus I can capture action as a bonus. So looking forward to using this camera at my next wedding! Fuji, come out with a wireless TTL flash system - only thing that is missing. For now I'll use my RadioPoppers with my Canon flashes.
on March 16, 2016
This camera is everything I expected and more. Image quality is superb. Build quality is superb, and feels great in your hand. I bought the optional grip and find that feels better in my hand. The controls are all on the right and so easy to access and intuitive. I don't care for the new ISO dial but otherwise the controls are quick and easy.
Focus is fast and accurate. I used the camera with the slowest lens I own, the 60mm f2.4, at a rodeo. I shot in continuous focus with focus tracking on and my hit rate was easily 90% or better at 8fps! I was shocked.
Bottom line, I may buy a second body and sell my X-E2 and X-T1. That's how much I love this camera.
Focus is fast and accurate. I used the camera with the slowest lens I own, the 60mm f2.4, at a rodeo. I shot in continuous focus with focus tracking on and my hit rate was easily 90% or better at 8fps! I was shocked.
Bottom line, I may buy a second body and sell my X-E2 and X-T1. That's how much I love this camera.
on March 16, 2016
Reading the handful of negative reviews, I wonder if we purchased the same camera. Did they just get bad copies? Or did they understand what they were purchasing? Detailed reviews are available all over the web so I will spare the comprehensive take but as we should all know, this is not meant to be an entry level camera. Far from it.
I have shot Nikon SLRs for 15 years and still own a D800 along with a full complement of lenses.
I once owned a Fuji X100 which began my love of shooting with the XSeries. Eventually, upgraded to the X100s and waited for years for the update to the XPRO line as the X-T1 while widely lauded, was not the shooting style I loved with Fuji. (I feel you are an SLR style shooter or prefer the Range-Finder style)
The Ranger-Finder like form factor is perfect for my intended use: Street portraits and Travel Photography.
I have had this camera for almost two weeks and aside from the initial settings reset that plagued many within the first day of owning (happens once and the Firmware to fix is on its way this week), I have had ZERO issues with this beauty. I am about 500 images in and the IQ on this thing is ridiculous. The camera emotes and so do the photos it takes. Now if you are going to zoom in at 100% and 'measurebate' every individual pixel then perhaps this is not the camera for you. If you are looking to shoot a ton of video then there may be other options out there. This is truly a photographer's camera.
And as for numbers and speed, all I can say is that shooting side by side with my D800, the only big difference observed is the size and weight differential. Any AF Speed differential is hardly discernible, even in low light. The images are beautiful with incredible dynamic range and while I will keep my D800 for other shooting needs, it now feels like a brick.
I have shot Nikon SLRs for 15 years and still own a D800 along with a full complement of lenses.
I once owned a Fuji X100 which began my love of shooting with the XSeries. Eventually, upgraded to the X100s and waited for years for the update to the XPRO line as the X-T1 while widely lauded, was not the shooting style I loved with Fuji. (I feel you are an SLR style shooter or prefer the Range-Finder style)
The Ranger-Finder like form factor is perfect for my intended use: Street portraits and Travel Photography.
I have had this camera for almost two weeks and aside from the initial settings reset that plagued many within the first day of owning (happens once and the Firmware to fix is on its way this week), I have had ZERO issues with this beauty. I am about 500 images in and the IQ on this thing is ridiculous. The camera emotes and so do the photos it takes. Now if you are going to zoom in at 100% and 'measurebate' every individual pixel then perhaps this is not the camera for you. If you are looking to shoot a ton of video then there may be other options out there. This is truly a photographer's camera.
And as for numbers and speed, all I can say is that shooting side by side with my D800, the only big difference observed is the size and weight differential. Any AF Speed differential is hardly discernible, even in low light. The images are beautiful with incredible dynamic range and while I will keep my D800 for other shooting needs, it now feels like a brick.
on March 5, 2016
This is my first Fuji—and so far so good. I like shooting smaller mirrorless cameras—mostly micro four thirds (M43) for travel and street photography. When I have time, I also like to shoot serious landscape photography. For most purposes M43 works for me, but occasionally I’d like to have the advantage of a larger sensor. Olympus and Panasonic-Leica are producing a number excellent prime lenses, including Olympus newer f2.8 pro zooms. However, as the apertures have gotten larger, the size and weight is increasing, which tends to defeat some of the purpose of the M43 smaller sensor.
Meanwhile, Fuji, Sony, and others have been making some attractive new choices with both APS-C and full frame mirrorless bodies. Sony is leading the way with sensor technology, but the range of lens choices still lags (although you can use adapters for some other lenses) and the E mount full frame lenses are large and very expensive. So after reading many reviews, I decided to try the new Fuji X Pro 2 with its improved sensor and features, and--thanks to a big Fujinon lens sale—I added the 14 mm f2.8 prime and 10-24 mm f4-5.6 for landscape shooting.
First impressions: After several days with the new camera and lenses, as well as some head-to-head comparison shooting with my smaller equipment, I’m very pleased with the X Pro 2 and the quality of results from the new lenses.
Pros: The X Pro 2 has a solid, well-designed weather sealed body; it allows choice between optical and electronic viewfinder; it has a new larger sensor and image processor, with option to choose between 77 and 273 AF focal points; the X Pro 2 has excellent professional dials for exposure, shutter speed, and ISO with a front lever to switch between the optical and EVF; the useful joystick is useful for moving focal points (but a touch screen would be better); its menus are logical with options for customization; dual SD card slots; and you can add a well-designed optional handgrip. The X Pro 2’s video is good (but not state of the art—but you probably won’t be buying this camera for video anyway).
Cons: The X Pro 2 has no in-body image stabilization and no touch screen, and it has a slight flicker of display in low light (at least on my copy).
Bottom line: The X Pro 2 has the feel of a sophisticated pro tool, it is a pleasure to use and it produces great results. It is a good choice and complement for my M43 line up.
Meanwhile, Fuji, Sony, and others have been making some attractive new choices with both APS-C and full frame mirrorless bodies. Sony is leading the way with sensor technology, but the range of lens choices still lags (although you can use adapters for some other lenses) and the E mount full frame lenses are large and very expensive. So after reading many reviews, I decided to try the new Fuji X Pro 2 with its improved sensor and features, and--thanks to a big Fujinon lens sale—I added the 14 mm f2.8 prime and 10-24 mm f4-5.6 for landscape shooting.
First impressions: After several days with the new camera and lenses, as well as some head-to-head comparison shooting with my smaller equipment, I’m very pleased with the X Pro 2 and the quality of results from the new lenses.
Pros: The X Pro 2 has a solid, well-designed weather sealed body; it allows choice between optical and electronic viewfinder; it has a new larger sensor and image processor, with option to choose between 77 and 273 AF focal points; the X Pro 2 has excellent professional dials for exposure, shutter speed, and ISO with a front lever to switch between the optical and EVF; the useful joystick is useful for moving focal points (but a touch screen would be better); its menus are logical with options for customization; dual SD card slots; and you can add a well-designed optional handgrip. The X Pro 2’s video is good (but not state of the art—but you probably won’t be buying this camera for video anyway).
Cons: The X Pro 2 has no in-body image stabilization and no touch screen, and it has a slight flicker of display in low light (at least on my copy).
Bottom line: The X Pro 2 has the feel of a sophisticated pro tool, it is a pleasure to use and it produces great results. It is a good choice and complement for my M43 line up.
on March 14, 2016
After owning around 25 cameras in 15 years, I can safely say that the Xpro 2 is the best one I ever used. Not only does it deliver great files (Lots of detail and great high ISO capability), it is also a joy to use. Nowadays most cameras are becoming like computers that take pictures, Fuji managed to make a camera that is simple to use, with direct controls to everything a photographer needs. They also upped their build quality, coming from a Fuji Xt1 and Xe2, I can say that the Xpro 2 has a much better improved build than the rest of the pack.
I had the camera reset itself to factory settings after few hours of use (I think many people had the same problem), however I haven't experienced any other problems since.
I know this camera is more expensive than most APSC cameras, however if you are really into a hybrid VF, range style camera, it is the best one out there short of a 5 times more expansive Leica.
HIGHLY Recommended!!!
I had the camera reset itself to factory settings after few hours of use (I think many people had the same problem), however I haven't experienced any other problems since.
I know this camera is more expensive than most APSC cameras, however if you are really into a hybrid VF, range style camera, it is the best one out there short of a 5 times more expansive Leica.
HIGHLY Recommended!!!
on March 16, 2016
Have owned an X100, X100S and X-E2. While I loved those cameras, there was always one or more issues that detracted from the experience. No more! This big bad boy has fast focus, a great combo optical viewfinder, dual card slots and a great, well balanced body. Couldn't be happier with it.
on March 3, 2016
Excellent image quality, brilliant hybrid viewfinder, ergonomically a huge improvement over all of fuji's past cameras. The only significant downsides I see are the lag of an articulating screen and 4K video.
Side tangent: I hope a small 23mm quick auto focusing lens is released some point soon, the 35f2 is a perfect companion lens for the X-Pro2 but for those who want to go wider without distorting your subjects or making for unflattering portraits, the only real option right now is the 23 f1.4 which isn't nearly as fast at focusing as the new 35 and its significantly larger than any Fuji prime I've used.
[...]
Here's an uncompressed test image showing what Acros looks like.
You can view my actual photo work [...]
Side tangent: I hope a small 23mm quick auto focusing lens is released some point soon, the 35f2 is a perfect companion lens for the X-Pro2 but for those who want to go wider without distorting your subjects or making for unflattering portraits, the only real option right now is the 23 f1.4 which isn't nearly as fast at focusing as the new 35 and its significantly larger than any Fuji prime I've used.
[...]
Here's an uncompressed test image showing what Acros looks like.
You can view my actual photo work [...]