yahoo2u

Great detail, the 109 is a very good unit.

I'm shedding a tear.

1 second is enough.

There would be no difference in images between this and the Nikon D5500 with the 18-55 kit lens...actually the Nikon would probably shine.

Don't like the Northern Hemisphere, it's the way the water swirls in the toilet bowl, makes me dizzy.

...and this is the problem with the "modern day" photographer who doesn't print. They pixel peep at 200% and really have no idea.

Good, hope they rammed his head into the concrete real hard.

Exactly.

Why did you consider it? What drew you to the M3?

There you go, as the second best seller in Asia, population around 4 billion, you really think they care about 3 or 4 Americans whining about their first world problems on DPR???

@DualSystemGuy....image 8, what do you see at 100%?

yes it does, and the edge performance ain't that great. Image 8 is an example, possibly motion blur...but that may be DPR not using the camera properly, @70mm using 1/80...why post it?

I'd keep using film :)

Wonderful images here Murray.

Mr. Go Tokura, Group Executive ICP has a lot of sway there. You are presuming too much.

Yes i think so, bad/poor sample. I have seen some real life examples and they are not that bad from the X70. Personally, i prefer the GR.

The GR shines here, but i have issues with DPR taking that X70 image. It just looks too bad to be true. Seems like there is motion blur all over it.

The world stockmarkets have wiped 20% of their value in the last 6 months, and that goes for most corporate companies world wide, most not all. Economies all over are struggling, nothing new. Camer ...

Asia is a very strange market ;) Funnily enough the EOS M was the 2nd best seller with just under 10% of the camera market when released, whereas in the US it was regarded generally as a POS by the ...

Excellent.