Jorginho

From the dpreview EM10 MkII review...... "To expound on this low light Raw performance, the pattern we saw in JPEG noise performance is largely mirrored here: the Nikon 1 J5's smaller sensor means ...

Otherwise it are two spec sheets subjectively assessed by the users here. How is that informative?

I think I made zero comments on Dl Nikon since I have no clue what they exactly offer. May be you could make list of what they can and can't do so we all have a clue and can see it up- and downsides?

GX80/85 release itself is a surprise. But what is really  surprising is the specsheet. The few minor downsides are the 16MP sensor (20Mp would at least look better) and the EVF which in some ...

In  Dutch since Hans talks Dutch (for once): Ik zie 'm bij WEX in Engeland voor 509 pond zonder en 599 met lens. De A6300 zit dan  op 1000 pond..zonder lens. Bij fotohanskeuzekamp, die ik je zeer ...

Yes but do note the 10MkII is 4 stops effective. 5MkII is 5 stops. And Panny notes a 5 stop gain WITH DUAL IS on the GX80. That is 1 eV short of the 6 eV reached with the 300 mm F4 plys Em1. But ...

You know him better than I do but GAS is a disease that cannot be dealt with with reason...;-) I mean it as I joke, but there is something with it that I seriously mean. So some people are simly so ...

Hi, At least in the case of the Olympus 300 MM F4 + 5axis IBIS on the EM1 we are talking 6 eV. So that means ISO 100 vs ISO6400. Sure, if things do move the use is gone. If you  are an ...

Well I he  now has the whole part that spun out of control removed,so good on him!

I had that one on my mind too. But 14 mm or 12 mm is a serious differnce too (60 or 140 mm of course is so clearly too) but I suspect the 12-60 to have  better IQ. But 14-140 for sure is a good ...

I saw a comparison with the two cams side by side and how they stabilised the image and the GX80 did much  better than EM10MkII. Now you shoudl elaborate please :-) I wonder if they in a rush would ...

Thx, didn't read that!

Well for sportsshooting it is worse most likely too. If you don't need video, EM10MkII seems a solid option too btw.

I would go for the 12-60 which seems reasonably allround (24-120 at FF).

Both fitted with an equally good lens on a tripod in testing situations will give the Sony a visibly better picture. When there is no tripod things may rapidly change, but when stabilisation does ...

In an argument over the use of IS, which we all can  have our thoughts on  the moderator takes an example from an article to prove OIS causes problems. However, when  read the article this has got ...

There are a lot of followers usually. I think the research  on Eichmann has shown that. He simply followed orders. If it was to erase a race from the planet or a letter from the alphabet, he would ...

You may be should inform yourself a little better on the sensorside of things. Of course it remains to be seen how well the GX80/85 does, until it is tested we do not know but we can be 95% sure ...

But also more missed shots. You need to deploy it, IBIS etc not so much (unless you shut it off in the meny of course). But for sure a tripod is the way to go if you do not care about the weight ...

Depends a little. The GH4 which I have has visible better DR than for instance the Sony m43 sensors (also 16 MP). In DxO it scores 12,8 eV at base ISO where the A6000 gets 13,1 eV. This is not a ...