tbcass

You can't trust much of what is said in any of these forums. The best bet is to do your own research.

Since the 2 cameras are about the same size and the FZ1000 is not more advanced than the RX10 I suspect you are thinking about the Sony RX100, not the RX10. Also the Panasonic forum will be just ...

:-D:-D:-D That made my day. :-D:-D:-D

Yes and is why I mentioned weddings of the rich and famous. I've been to a lot of weddings and have never seen a photographer using a MF camera. The people I know aren't rich and famous and...

While that may be true what we are discussing is a still/video hybrid, a camera that is to be used for both. On that basis which is a greater compromise, a still camera used for video or a video ...

Are metal prints natural looking. I'm old fashioned and prefer natural looking prints. This description from a printer suggest a rather unnatural look because of the terms vibrant and luminescence. ...

Great capture of a rare moment.

Revenant;

This is extreme overkill for wedding photography. Heck, unless you're doing weddings of the rich and famous any good APS-C or 4/3 camera will do the job.

EthanP99;

If you blew up the photo enough true but at the sizes 99.999% of us print I say you couldn't tell the difference. Cameras like this are specialized for a narrow range of pro...

The only way to know for sure is to see what others in the show are selling similar prints for. I say selling because often people ask too much and don't sell.

Do you use it for broadcast use? If not why was that important to you.

A bridge camera is one that bridges the gap between P&S and ICL mirrorless/DSLR cameras being a little of both and with a fixed lens. Video is not a requirement. I would call a still/video camera a...

Saying nothing as being terrible for still photography. You are 100% correct and I suspect that the only reason that he posted here was to stoke his ego. The RX100iii is a hybrid still/video ...

The 16-300 is better than the 18-250. I know nothing about the 28-300.

Greetings from a fellow, if more tightwad oriented, Bass player (been at it for 45 years). That's why I like the Idea of the camera being E Mount with an A mount adapter included in the price.

It's a very complex stacked sensor. I don't know but possibly adding PD sensors would have negatively affected the sensor in some other way.

The concept with adapter was discussed many times in many threads besides that. For me back then I said I wanted a full sized body with SLT ergonomics and AF with adapter at least as good as my ...

I would if it was cheap enough, and if the ergonomics and AF was as good as my A77ii. I thought the A6300 would be it but it's small size and, mostly, restrictions for AF modes rule it out.

Or you're just used to that form factor so you prefer it because that's what you're used to. I also have used both, camcorders for 30+ years and DSLR for 47 years but as an amature. I can use ...

Can't the "dim shots" be avoided with a little + EV?