Stephen Scharf

So many folks griping about such silly things that keep all those pros from getting their work done...

Anyhoo, I enjoyed the video, and encourage you to do more.

What I enjoyed most was the...

I'll go out on a limb here and predict that DPR will never do a full review of this camera, just as they never did one for the 1DX or the D4.

Well, Dan, you guys blew by not putting the Fuji 90mm f/2.0 on this list. The results will not be meaningful because this was the best lens any mfr released this year.

Why isn't the Fuji XF90mm f/2.0 WR on this list? It is the sharpest lens Imaging Resource has ever tested....

Glad to see the X100T here, it has been the most-used camera of mine in 2015 (bought mine January 2).

One thing continues to trouble me about your editorial content. Why do DPR editors continue...

Hasselblad, along with Kodak, is a classic example of a dominant incumbent taken apart by a disruptive innovation, acc. the Innovators Dilemma as described by Clayton Christensen of HBS. Their most...

No, that's not what I mean at all. Those developments were true breakthroughs in *functionality*. This is just another whacky take on design.

Yet another "brilliant' idea that will ultimately fail in the marketplace. Pretty clear that DxO did virtually no Voice of the Customer on this one. There are sound reasons why cameras are designed...

You've got to feel for Fuji....they do the right thing for customers, and they get bashed for it.

They put out a wonderful and significant enhancement to a superb camera FOR FREE, and they get...

I'm not having a battery life problem; I'm easily getting over 1,000- frames on a single X-T1 battery, even when shooting on Continous High AF with Predictive tracking (motorsports). What more...

I agree. For example, the DPR guys pushed them pretty hard on the whole DX lens thing, but Nikon was having none of it.

They've only got themselves to blame for their tanking sales.

Well, in a way, yes. In the language of innovation discipline, they are "fractalizing" their markets into smaller and smaller "pieces". Addressing a much more limited set of specific user needs...

I don't have a problem, and I don't think Canon has to build a camera to suit everyone's taste. What they are doing, though, is "fractalizing" their markets to smaller and smaller customer niches...

I agree. I thought they were particularly and quite noticeably evasive. Their whole answer to the mirrorless questions re: Nikon 1 reminded me of the non-denial denial from "All the President's...

This is another example of why the majority of users in most use cases don't need or, more importantly, cannot fully utilize ≥ 24 megapixel resolution either in APS-C or "full-frame" sensors; this...

@Barney:

"Gold/Silver awards are not intrinsically tied to the scoring. This has been explained many many many many many many many many times ..."

With all due respect, the reason that your...

Massive is a relative term. It's still smaller than a full-frame sensor lens would be.

A Canon 400/2.8L IS is massive. A 16-55? Not so much.

Really, this constant push by the media for more megapixels isn't serviing customers with better products. I really don't understand why there is this constant push for more resolution. Fuji has...