When a devastating illness threatens to end Evan Lake's career in the C.I.A., he goes rogue to hunt down a terrorist who tortured him during a mission gone awry years ago.
In the aftermath of the 2010 BP oil spill, an idealistic but flawed politician is forced to confront his dysfunctional life after his career is destroyed in a sex scandal.
Director:
Austin Stark
Stars:
Sarah Paulson,
Nicolas Cage,
Connie Nielsen
An Alaska State Trooper partners with a young woman who escaped the clutches of serial killer Robert Hansen to bring the murderer to justice. Based on actual events.
After his wife is assaulted, a husband enlists the services of a vigilante group to help him settle the score. Then he discovers they want a 'favor' from him in return.
Bruce Willis stars in this Sci-Fi thriller about ultimate resort: VICE, where customers can play out their wildest fantasies with artificial inhabitants who look like humans.
Veteran CIA agent Evan Lake has been ordered to retire. But when his protégé uncovers evidence that Lake's nemesis, the terrorist Banir, has resurfaced, Lake goes rogue, embarking on a perilous, intercontinental mission to eliminate his sworn enemy. Written by
Lionsgate
Cinematographer Gabriel Kosuth publicly disowned this released version of the film: On 8 December 2014 he published a guest column on Variety.com in which he wrote that he "...was denied the possibility to accomplish in post-production what is any cinematographer's duty: from the American Cinematographer Manual:] 'assuring that what audiences will see on cinema and television screens faithfully reflects the 'look' intended by the director'." Kosuth further explained the significant digital alterations made by the producers to his cinematography in post-production: "The film we shot had images with strong, violent colors and was dark. This one is not. (...) Paul Schrader wanted color to play an unusual, extremely important role in the visual style of his movie. An expressionistic approach where color doesn't just represent moods and feelings, but meanings and symbols. This is why he insisted that color should be embedded in the very fiber of the image - using filters on lenses and colored lights - so that we were not merely catching colors on film, but truly sculpting the picture with color. The moment you try to 're-paint' or modify such a thing, it is supposed to crash to pieces. And this is what has happened to Dying of the Light (2014) - an unpleasant and tragic demonstration of the limits to the so-called wonders of digital post-production. By surgically eliminating the expressionistic color from the image - the pasty yellow-green of the African scenes, the dense sepia-chocolate of the American ones, and the bluish-green from the European ones - an unknown author has offered the public not only a crippled caricature of everything, but a collection of images deprived of soul, emotion and significance. (...) As pretentious as it may sound, the reality is that color affects not only the perception of the artist's world on screen, but the perception of an actor's performance too: Eyes, skin, make-up, hair, come to us in an 'intended' emotional color. (For those who don't believe, try watching Apocalypse Now (1979) in black-and-white.) The unbalancing of a well thought 'color formula' has the effect of mutilating not only atmosphere, composition, and centers of interest in the frame, but also detailed production design, costume and make-up concepts all based on that original formula. I'm writing this letter because I'm trying to understand why would someone deliberately ruin such a visual expression. Just because it's possible? By pushing some magical buttons at a console, or because of some kind of aesthetic Daltonism? Why would someone damage something achieved with unknown effort and sleepless nights? Just because there are people today who cannot take a human activity called artistic creation seriously?" See more »
Goofs
When the private jet lands in Mombasa, the Customs official stamps Evan's passport with JKIA. Jomo Kenyatta International Airport is in Nairobi. See more »
It is Well Known, or Maybe Only Well Known Among Film Geeks, that This Film has been Disowned by Director Paul Schrader and Other Principals Involved in Making This Movie, and it is, Among Other Things, a Film Fanatic's Frustration.
The Director has Advised that No One See This Film. Schrader is Shrewd Enough to Know that is Going to Attract Movie Lovers to Want to See It for No Other Reason than it has been Bad-Mouthed by its Creators.
One has to Question the Sanity of Producers that Hire the Likes of Edgy Existential Film Artists and then Decide it is Too Edgy and Existential for the Box Office, Take the Thing Out of Their Hands and Tinker with it Like a Naughty Kid Pulling the Wings of Flies. Shame Shame.
What the Movie Going Public is Left With is Not a Bad Movie. Enough of Schrader's Fingerprints Remain to Make it an Offbeat CiA Thriller. What Doesn't Remain is the Cinematographers and Directors Visual Palette as it was "Digitally Manipulated". Shame Shame.
Nic Cage, in Another Self-Realized Performance that Cannot be Ignored. He Manages to be Just a Heartbeat from Over-the-Top and it is Always a Fascination to Behold. If Cage Does Anything Anymore it is a Willingness to Work.
The Movie May Not be Appreciated for What it Is, as Opposed to What it Could Have Been, it is Still Worth Catching, as is All of Their Work, both Schrader and Cage are Nothing if Not Interesting, No Matter the Product.
4 of 7 people found this review helpful.
Was this review helpful to you?
It is Well Known, or Maybe Only Well Known Among Film Geeks, that This Film has been Disowned by Director Paul Schrader and Other Principals Involved in Making This Movie, and it is, Among Other Things, a Film Fanatic's Frustration.
The Director has Advised that No One See This Film. Schrader is Shrewd Enough to Know that is Going to Attract Movie Lovers to Want to See It for No Other Reason than it has been Bad-Mouthed by its Creators.
One has to Question the Sanity of Producers that Hire the Likes of Edgy Existential Film Artists and then Decide it is Too Edgy and Existential for the Box Office, Take the Thing Out of Their Hands and Tinker with it Like a Naughty Kid Pulling the Wings of Flies. Shame Shame.
What the Movie Going Public is Left With is Not a Bad Movie. Enough of Schrader's Fingerprints Remain to Make it an Offbeat CiA Thriller. What Doesn't Remain is the Cinematographers and Directors Visual Palette as it was "Digitally Manipulated". Shame Shame.
Nic Cage, in Another Self-Realized Performance that Cannot be Ignored. He Manages to be Just a Heartbeat from Over-the-Top and it is Always a Fascination to Behold. If Cage Does Anything Anymore it is a Willingness to Work.
The Movie May Not be Appreciated for What it Is, as Opposed to What it Could Have Been, it is Still Worth Catching, as is All of Their Work, both Schrader and Cage are Nothing if Not Interesting, No Matter the Product.