Buying guides 2015

News Reviews Articles Buying Guide Sample Images Videos Cameras LensesPhonesPrinters Forums Galleries Challenges

399

Inching forward? Canon PowerShot G5 X review posted

Published Dec 14, 2015 | Jeff Keller, Samuel Spencer, Rishi Sanyal

Buy on Amazon.com From $749.00

1 Previous

2 Specifications

3 Next

Specifications

Price
MSRP	$799
Body type
Body type	Compact
Sensor
Max resolution	5472 x 3648
Other resolutions	5472 x 3080, 4864 x 3648, 4320 x 2880, 4320 x 2432, 3840 x 2880, 2304 x 1536, 2048 x 1536, 1920 x 1080, 720 x 480, 720 x 408, 640 x 480
Image ratio w:h	4:3, 3:2, 16:9
Effective pixels	20 megapixels
Sensor photo detectors	21 megapixels
Sensor size	1″ (13.2 x 8.8 mm)
Sensor type	BSI-CMOS
Processor	DIGIC 6
Color space	sRGB
Color filter array	Primary color filter
Image
ISO	Auto, 125-12800
White balance presets	7
Custom white balance	Yes
Image stabilization	Optical
Uncompressed format	RAW
JPEG quality levels	Super fine, fine
File format	JPEG (EXIF v2.3) Raw (Canon CR2, 12-bit)
Image parameters	Contrast Sharpness Saturation Red/Green/Blue Skin tone
Optics & Focus
Focal length (equiv.)	24–100 mm
Optical zoom	4.2×
Maximum aperture	F1.8 - F2.8
Autofocus	Contrast Detect (sensor) Multi-area Center Selective single-point Tracking Single Continuous Touch Face Detection Live View
Autofocus assist lamp	Yes
Digital zoom	Yes (4x)
Manual focus	Yes
Normal focus range	5 cm (1.97″)
Macro focus range	5 cm (1.97″)
Screen / viewfinder
Articulated LCD	Fully articulated
Screen size	3″
Screen dots	1,040,000
Touch screen	Yes
Screen type	TFT LCD
Live view	Yes
Viewfinder type	Electronic
Viewfinder coverage	100%
Viewfinder resolution	2,360,000
Photography features
Minimum shutter speed	30 sec
Maximum shutter speed	1/2000 sec
Exposure modes	Auto Hybrid Auto Program Shutter priority Aperture priority Manual Custom
Scene modes	Sports Portrait Smart Shutter Star Handheld Night Scene Snow Fireworks
Built-in flash	Yes
Flash range	7.00 m (at Auto ISO)
External flash	Yes
Flash modes	Auto, on, slow synchro, off
Drive modes	Single Continuous Self-timer Remote
Continuous drive	5.9 fps
Self-timer	Yes (2 or 10 secs, custom)
Metering modes	Multi Center-weighted Spot
Exposure compensation	±3 (at 1/3 EV steps)
WB Bracketing	No
Videography features
Resolutions	1920 x 1080 (60p, 30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30p)
Format	MPEG-4, H.264
Videography notes	Also has star time-lapse. miniature effect, and digest modes
Microphone	Stereo
Speaker	Mono
Storage
Storage types	SD/SDHC/SDXC
Connectivity
USB	USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
HDMI	Yes (micro-HDMI)
Microphone port	Yes
Headphone port	No
Wireless	Built-In
Wireless notes	802.11b/g/n with NFC
Remote control	Yes (via cable or smartphone)
Physical
Environmentally sealed	No
Battery	Battery Pack
Battery description	NB-13L lithium-ion battery and charger
Battery Life (CIPA)	210
Weight (inc. batteries)	353 g (0.78 lb / 12.45 oz)
Dimensions	112 x 76 x 44 mm (4.41 x 2.99 x 1.73″)
Other features
Orientation sensor	Yes
Timelapse recording	Yes (star time-lapse)
GPS	None

Tags: review, canon

Previous page 1 Introduction

Next page 3 Body & Design

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Gear in this story

Canon PowerShot G5 X

I own it

134

I want it

I had it

Discuss in the forums

Shop now

25 customer reviews

Camera Only In stock Usually ships in 24 hours	$749.00 »
Printer Bundle In stock Usually ships in 24 hours	$999.00 »
w/ Free 32GB Memory Card In stock Usually ships in 24 hours	$749.00 »

Canon PowerShot G5 X Digital Camera w/4.2x Optical Zoom - PIXMA PRO-100 Printer Bundle

$1099.00

Comments

Total comments: 399

"Sadly, two of the G7 X's most disappointing traits have carried over to the G5 X, namely sluggish Raw shooting performance and lackluster battery life. "

After Canon G7 X Mark II, shall we expect Canon PowerShot G5 X Mark II with DIGIC 7 anytime soon??

1 upvote

I have been using Sony DSC-HX50V, bought it basically because of 30x zoom. But found out, that it bends straight lines at the edges of the picture. Will G5 X help?

Edited 56 seconds after posting

0 upvotes

OK, I found it, the G5X Manual
Thanks anyway

0 upvotes

Where can I download manual for the Canon G5X.

0 upvotes

Not sure if this has been mentioned already, but a major factor in the short battery life is probably due to the touchscreen. Other devices, mainly laptops, have been shown to have significantly shorter battery lives when a touchscreen is added. The RX100iv has no touchscreen, so comparing battery life on the 2 might not be totally fair.

3 upvotes

Can the G5 X keep shooting, while being charged from the USB? Would be nifty....

0 upvotes

No. You can only view pictures or dig in the menu.

0 upvotes

Thanks, but darn.... Would have been nice, considering the poor battery life.

0 upvotes

Especially when you plug in an external battery USB charger it would have been nice.

1 upvote

wow awesome camera

1 upvote

At a glance, this camera is like a Nikon 1 V2 with articulated LCD display and non-interchangeable lens ..... :)

0 upvotes

I have been using a Canon Powershot S110 for several years. It's a great pocketable camera with a good zoom range but, first of all, the lack of a viewfinder, distortion, the loss of image quality at 24mm and 120mm are frustating.

So, the obvious upgrade is the Canon PowerShot G5 X hoping the lens does not bend too much strait lines. The zoom range of the Lumix DMC-LX 100 is too limited I think.

But then, keeping the S110, I could upgrade to a bigger camera like the Lumix DMC-FZ 1000 or even the Nikon D5500 + 18-140 zoom.

So, here is my question : is there a big difference in image quality between the GX 5, the DMC-FZ 1000 and the D5500 so that it's worth the extra weight and the extra bulk ?

0 upvotes

Thank you for your useful comments. I got my first camera in 1964, a Yashica Mat EM 6x6, and I am used to viewfinders. What the point to go around with a camera if you can't take pictures because you have the sun behind ! So the G5 X is the obvious upgrade. Thank you again.

1 upvote

Reference to the Nikon D5500. Anybody who buys a DSLR with the cheap kit lens is wasting their money. In fact such lenses should be against the law. ;-)

0 upvotes

Had this camera a week now. I'm a pro shooter FWIW. So Far: I LOVE IT. The EVF is almost as good as optical. I use it 90% of the time. I like the EVF way more than expected. Virtually everything is customizable. Layout similar to DSLR miniaturized. IQ of an underexposed image better than 5Diii. Noise looks more like film grain than digital noise. Yes, the ISO performance of full-frame is better. No surprise. But I can shove this in a large pocket.

Feel is super solid and smooth. Lens function is good. AF is good. Not 1Div good, but plenty good for what I want.

I wanted a *small* camera that I can take virtually anywhere that can take high quality images with full manual control. I think this is it. It's a joy to hold, functions as spec'ed, and image quality so far is really good. It's been a long time since I've been so stoked about a new camera.

I've owned & shot Nikon, Ricoh, Sony, and Panny. Really like this one.

1 upvote

There's a reason there are so many RX100s, the ultra small size combined with excellent IQ. It's a combo that just strikes a chord with a lot of people. IMO cameras like the G5X are an inconvenient inbetween size, not small enough to be super portable and not big enough for proper handling. Among Canon Cameras the G9X makes more sense, 1" sensor, smaller size and pretty cheap.

Edited 3 times; latest 10 minutes since posting

0 upvotes

The original Sony is another good choice. It's still available and sells for $400.

0 upvotes

like dis cam

0 upvotes

When is DPR going to review the Canon G9 X, which was announced on the same day as the Canon G5 X? The G9 X is more pocketable, and costs less, than the G9 X.

0 upvotes

Not a professional photographer here, just a camera enthusiast. Sold my Sony RX100 M3 for a good deal (so no harm done at all) and now thinking of getting either the G5X or going for the RX100 M4. What do you guys suggest?

Pros of Canon: Touch screen and I like the look
Cons: Might be a downgrade (?)

Edited 2 times; latest 11 minutes since posting

0 upvotes

Unless you really need to fit that camera in your pant's pocket get the Canon, IQ is actually above that of the MIII (look at DXO comparisons) and handling difference is HUGE, the EVF is also way better than the MIV and the Canon is also significantly cheaper.

2 upvotes

Another option is the G7X, which is basically the same camera (same sensor, processor, lens, screen, etc.) as the G5X in a smaller, RX100-like package. That is, if you don't need the EVF, articulated screen and the extra dials.

1 upvote

SSantana75 The G5X hasn't been tested by DXO (as of 03-05-2016) so where did you get that idea? Of course since you are a G5X owner your opinion is far from unbiased ;-)

http://www.dxomark.com/Cameras/Compare/Side-by-side/Canon-PowerShot-G5-X-versus-Sony-Cyber-shot-DSC-RX100-IV___1050_1033

That said the RX100IV is a better overall camera but also more expensive, probably too expensive for what it is. I think the G5x is also overpriced, just not as much as the RX100IV. If I was going to buy a camera with a 1" sensor and didn't want a pocket cam the Pany FZ1000 is the only one I would consider. It's the best of the lot and costs $700.

http://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/search?Ntt=Panasonic+Fz1000&InitialSearch=yes&N=0&gclid=CjwKEAiApOq2BRDoo8SVjZHV7TkSJABLe2iD1soRUKGIdMYjTzGuBvnk8y8Q0_VI-ZivTZElN8sOgRoCN5rw_wcB

Edited 7 times; latest 15 minutes since posting

0 upvotes

good com

0 upvotes

What kind of material is mode of for the body ? In addition, the lens is made of GLASS, not plastic ?

0 upvotes

seriously? plastic lens? the G5X is made of magnesium alloy and the lens is definitely glass.

2 upvotes

nice cam

2 upvotes

Sony sensor is only good with dynamic range. Color tones and gradation are better with canon sensor. That 'canon colors' are missing...
If canon make a compact with 1.5 or apsc sensor and a L marked lenses. It sure will be a hit. Still waiting for Pro-1 successor. Hope the wait will be over after a decade. Also they should bring their dslr line image processing into this. Right now canon still has powershot and dslr processing separate. Until then it will still be a 'compact camera' image.

Edited 2 times; latest 5 minutes since posting

0 upvotes

nice cam

0 upvotes

Kind of sums it up: "photographers who care about speed and ultimate image quality, the RX100 III is the way to go."

1 upvote

no so I would prefer a G5x. It has evething I need in a compact body

Edited 3 minutes after posting

6 upvotes

I have an RX100. I more often use my G5X.

5 upvotes

EddyGil, so now your saying the reviewer is wrong? LOL

1 upvote

Jennyhappy2. "Argument from authority"? How cute.

4 upvotes

That was a direct quote from the editor on this site, I will put more accuracy in that. LOL

1 upvote

It's still the most childish form of argument.

5 upvotes

LOL read the article LOL

1 upvote

Meh. This pro chose the G5x. Don't regret it. And I have Sony stuff too.

3 upvotes

Jennyhappy2, you really are on a roll with the childishness. I probably own more Sony gear than you do. Grow up.

4 upvotes

Just because the editor of this site thinks that way doesn't make it a fact. Camera in pocket to first shot the Canon is faster, no need to pull out that silly little EVF. The image quality of the first shot taken by the Canon is absolutely better than the one you missed with the Sony while fluffing about with the EVF. Don't use the EVF? well, it is still faster to touch-shutter the canon than to move a focus point or recompose on the Sony so again, IQ better on the Canon than the non-existent Sony shot.

4 upvotes

Ahhh, ok, if you say so. LOL :-)

1 upvote

No GPS. Pass.

1 upvote

Not a deal breaker for me.

2 upvotes

Get lost.

1 upvote

I have offered this model as a gift to my brother for Christmas and since it does not stop doing photo. It is to the angels, you can't imagine :)

3 upvotes

Does the lens have a filter thread? Can one mount a polarizer on it?

0 upvotes

Nope, but a kit from Lensmate takes care of that.
http://www.lensmateonline.com/store/canon_G5_X.php
Works just fine....

4 upvotes

Took some long exposures in London with this camera. Not a bad little performer, and the in-built ND filter helps with slowing the shutter speed too.

http://alphawhiskey.slickpic.com/photoblog/post/ChristmasLightsAndLongExposures

6 upvotes

These are very pleasing on the eye, very nice indeed. Where can i see some higher res ones?

Edited 39 seconds after posting

0 upvotes

Hey Alpha, I read your piece on photographylife and loved it, as well as every other article you've written, always funny and with none of that (nikon/full-frame is the best) nonsense which frequently tarnished most articles on that site. (other than yours and Thomas' articles) Cheers!

1 upvote

Thank you SSantana75 :)

1 upvote

I'm glad to see Canon inching forward. My first DSLR (three decades ago) was a Canon and I loved it but they seem stuck in the past...just like Nikon. These two behemoths need to get with the game. Sony is setting the world on fire by giving photographers what they want and need. I will not reward a manufacturer my hard earned money until they give us products that are cutting edge. Sony is guilty too. How long has Gordon Laing and other top reviewers been touting fully articulated screens? Sony is stuck on tilting screens which is only marginally better. It makes sense once you get over traditional "old thinking". Try shooting at ground level if you are a bit older and less agile without a fully articulated screen. Panasonic has led the way and Olympus has adopted it for the Em5 Mk II. Still improvements are needed. Bigger buffers, faster write times, 4K video, etc. 2015 was a landmark year for photographers. Manufacturers began to give us what we want. Lets hope 2016 is better.

Edited 1 minute after posting

3 upvotes

In the days of film, none of these discussions occurred. There were advancements and excitement, but the camera and the film were two entities, and digital processing was expensive and film was fairly forgiving of AF systems.
Now the sensors reveal lens flaws and you have way more than a printed 4X6 to prove it. Digital processing of digital images offers an exciting new method for advancement, as well as offering a plethora of gimmicks, exaggerated claims, and unnecessary technicalities to appease the newly emboldened consumers of both the informed and ignorant variety. The interwebs offers tons of information, but no cohesive way for one to go about being properly educated. And in all that needs and priorities have been supplanted by wants and boredom and shortened attention spans.
Sony has provided competition in vaguely new ways, but in ways the market was already headed. They have done interesting things and hasty, annoying things. Canon and Nikon remain extremely relevant.

12 upvotes

Joseph, Nice to see there are still people with functioning heads on their shoulders.

1 upvote

Thanks. I try to interject critical thought into an otherwise knee-jerk comment section. People in general don't have a thought in their head about what anyone in the past experienced, even if that refers to themselves only a few short years ago.

1 upvote

Joseph, it seems all the discussion around cameras these days is similar to what people interested in PCs discuss, speed, performance, features etc. The difference is that in that context the numbers do matter as the factors affecting them change everyday, that is games get more and more complex and textures get larger and larger as well as having more polygons on screen etc. In the real world however (where photos occur) there is no such change, days are not getting brighter, nor are nights getting darker and the dynamic range of visible light hasn't changed since camera's were first invented. Sure the technical part of photography is still highly relevant but without a doubt less of a constraint than it has ever been which can only lead to having more time to concentrate on the other side of the equation, artistic interpretation of a scene which unfortunately (or fortunately) is not something any of these manufactures can sell you, nor money can buy, it is free...just go shooting.

2 upvotes

good cam

2 upvotes

It seems better at macro than the G7X. G7X macro are very blurry, these look good. But I may be wrong because they have the same lens though. What do you think ?

0 upvotes

This camera lens are very nice which result is so good.

1 upvote

I agree. Soft? Idk... Maybe I got lucky. For a point and shoot, I love it!

2 upvotes

My the days of DP Review being accused of being Canon fanboys which used to happen on a regular basis, are long over. Nary a single camera seems to get top honors. The enthusiasts cameras are being accused of overall pedestrian handling (I agree) and the DSLRs are all being accused of inferior sensors compared to the competition. Canon is still number one in sales though, aren't they?

6 upvotes

This place is Sony Central these days.

4 upvotes

I am disappointed that the review doesn´t discuss comparing this camera´s 1" sensor with the G1X´s 1.5" sensor. It seems to me that is what many of us would like to delve into, and know more about.

1 upvote

If you check out the graph at the conclusion page with the green lines and add G1X Mark ll it shows that the G5X has better Jpegs, Raw, and is better in low light.

1 upvote

These 5 models have different layout of buttons and menus. Could somebody who has access to these models please enlighten us about ergonometric and advantages of each layout of mechanical features. At the end of the days an awkward position of a button makes a lot of difference. Thank you.

1 upvote

The camera is too ugly, but the lens sure is nice...

1 upvote

For me, having a pretty camera is the last thing I consider before making a camera purchase.

5 upvotes

Everything else being almost equal, I'll buy the pretty camera. It's more valuable in the resale market also. I'm kind of shallow, I buy better looking cars also.

0 upvotes

For me it is all about how it feels in my hands which is one reason I hate takings pics with my iPhone 6+.

4 upvotes

I think it's a nice looking camera, with a mini-DSLR aesthetic.

6 upvotes

But according to my experience its result are better and also camera design is attractive and easy to handle.

3 upvotes

Its design is not typical canon. This looks like Olympus style. Retro style with vf humps is the trend. Better if canon did more modern styling.

Edited 60 seconds after posting

0 upvotes

Interesting takes... coming here a second time cause of the notifications, it doesn't look as offensive to me as it must have the first time I read the review ;-)

I guess I like pretty pictures and a pretty camera too if possible. Now if the ugly camera takes the better pictures, I will just take that...

At the moment, I'm leaning to make an A7s my next purchase. That's not overly pretty either. But full frame for well, not exactly cheap, but also not exorbitant, with a focus on video appeals to me, though a bunch of lenses could get it to exorbitant pretty quick! ;-)

Its been many years since I bought a Canon; just not the right feature mix at the right price points for what I want to do.

But yeah, I normally do like Canon's designs. The whole retro fad just doesn't do it for me. I had those old things and already wasn't particularly enamored with them back then.

Edited 2 times; latest 4 minutes since posting

0 upvotes

Full review of the 2 months old G5 X. Still only preview of the 10 months old 5DS(R). Wow.

1 upvote

Some things are more important to the manufacturers than others...

0 upvotes

any point in upgrading from G7X then?

0 upvotes

Fully articulating screen, hotshoe, cablerelease/intervalometer socket and EVF.... Just sad they didnt put a decent timelapse app into it ;-)

1 upvote

For me, yeah, for the viewfinder above all.

2 upvotes

To me the G5 X doesn't look that bad softness wise, but the colours are so much better IMO. I handled one in a shop yesterday and it's miles ahead of any of the RX100 series when it comes to control dial responsiveness/precision.

I'm seriously considering it as a travel camera.

8 upvotes

The RX100 IV, at longer focal lengths, looks blurry. The III and the G5X look better, and in my eye the G5X and III are close.

Select 50mm, step down to F5.6, and look a the furthest right tower at the top of the photo. The IV looks much worse than the other two cameras.

1 upvote

I loved my S90 until the dog got it. I now have an RX-100 that takes beautiful photos, but is kind of awkward to use. When the grandchildren are around I find myself reaching for my wife's G-16 which I find more comfortable and fun to use. I am hoping that a G5X will have the same joy in use as the G-16 and photos as good as the Rx-100.

3 upvotes

Folks think this camera is ugly. No, the Nikon1 V2 is UGLY!!

3 upvotes

insanely ugly... why not take a page from sony nex or fuji rangefinder style ....clunky looking crap from canikon shows a cluelessness that cannot be excused

1 upvote

in reality the camera is not as ugly as on the pictures!

1 upvote

Eye of the beholder.

1 upvote

Echoing others' sentiments - I think it looks pretty good in person.

12 upvotes

cosinaphile i would like to see your design for its replacement, lets judge you on your effort to bring something unique and not a clone Leica to the mass market.

P.S
I am having to sit on my hands with excitement.

1 upvote

Sony NEX? good looking desing? are you serious? you must be like 10 years old.

0 upvotes

So when will we see the G2 X, G4 X, G6 X, G8 X, and G10 X then?!

0 upvotes

the g8x will be coming soon.
Panasonic made a gx8 so Canon can't wait to make confusing again.

3 upvotes

The size is much bigger than RX100 II and III , I hope it is much better than RX100 II and III . otherwise many will buy Sony compact cameras

0 upvotes

If size is all that matters, many will be happy with their smartphone. There are also other issues like Raw, colors, user interface, comfort in hand, etc etc.

5 upvotes

utomo99 - So you can place it in your purse?

Edited 32 seconds after posting

0 upvotes

One error. One lack of mention:

Yes, there IS 23.98p Full HD video, which is the US-friendly equivalent of 24P.

There is a very usable ECO mode which gives you battery life of around 310 shots, which is actually BETTER than the RX100 Mk IV and not bad at all considering touch screens drain more battery.

People should not be misled on these factors by this review.

Edited 34 seconds after posting

5 upvotes

You are correct about the 24p frame rate- I will update the review.

When we discuss battery life we use the CIPA numbers so everyone is on a level playing field. There is an indeed an Eco mode which comes with a few compromises in order to stretch out the battery life.

2 upvotes

Another error is the camera is listed as having a mic port when it does not- it's some type of accessories port.

0 upvotes

So the hot shoe doesn't support microphones?

0 upvotes

Is it wise to buy a 1 inch camera at that price.....maybe I would at least prefer an APS-C sensor.........

0 upvotes

depends on what you want. You also have to take tne lens into the equation. This and the Sony have a F1.8-2.8 lens.

A Apsc camera at this price point will have 3.5-5.6 which is 2 stops slower. Or Fujifilm with a 2.8-4 which is still one stop slower.

Then the Iso advantage of the Apsc sensor is pretty much gone as you can just open up the lens and pick an Iso 2 stops lower. Yet still have that small footprint.

Unfortunately you can't mount a fast prime on these compacst to enhance it's capabilities.

3 upvotes

Dude, f/1.8 on a 1'' sensor gives an equivalent depth of field of f/3.5 on APS-C. APS-C is 2.5X better than 1'' in low light, so that too is equivalent. The thing is you cannot change lenses on a compact and you cannot make a small DSLR. But, you can make a small mirrorless and you can change lenses on a mirrorless. Though I personally would buy this Canon if I had money to spare! Another thing is that f/3.5 on APS-C is sharp, but on this camera f/1.8 isn't. Of course the equivalent f/4 or f/4.5 on a FF is even sharper but way more expensive to be justified by the small increase of quality.

Edited 2 times; latest 7 minutes since posting

1 upvote

agree with all you said.

juat wanna add that the Sony anad panasonic are sharp wide-open.

That problem at the wide-end is isolated to this Canon lens

1 upvote

True, the depth of field on a 1" sensor is much greater... so the 1.8 aperture point is really not valid

1 upvote

Conclusion: too big, way too expensive, sucks in every way possible, don't buy.

As far as looks go, I consider it one of the fuglieat camera ever.

I would buy an EOS M4 "Pro" - provided it is not larger or more expensive than M3, has a top notch EVF built-in and bests Sony A6000 in every respect: AF speed/tracking, IQ, battery charge, responsiveness in RAW, overall handling. Important: EOS, not Powershot (toy) firmware and UI.

4 upvotes

A rarely trollish post even for this part of the world. Perhaps next time you could try actually reading the review.

12 upvotes

BUG OFF!

1 upvote

On video recording, according to my info (the European version at least of) the camera offers:

(Full HD) 1920 x 1080, 59.94 / 50 / 29.97 / 25 / 23.98 fps
(HD) 1280 x 720, 29.97 / 25 fps
(L) 640 x 480, 29.97 / 25 fps
Star Time-Lapse Movie (Full HD) 29.97 / 25 / 14.99 / 12.5 fps

The US specs I could find are:

Full HD 1920 x 1080: 59.94 fps
Full HD iFrame: 1920 x 1080: 29.97 fps
Full HD Star Time-Lapse Movie: 1920 x 1080: 14.985 fps / 29.97 fps
HD 1280 x 720: 29.97 fps
640 x 480: 29.97 fps
Miniature Effect: 1280 x 720: 6 fps (5x speed) / 3 fps (10x speed) / 1.5 fps (20x speed)
Miniature Effect: 640 x 480: 6 fps (5x speed) / 3 fps (10x speed) / 1.5 fps (20x speed)

I can switch between NTSC and PAL to get this full range.

The review is a little misleading. There might not be 24P but there IS certainly a choice of 25P and 23.98P ... at least on some versions of the camera.

http://1.static.img-dpreview.com/files/p/TS940x940~forums/56941609/51d3afffee1042bca99df70afc32fd02

2 upvotes

Canon is kind of quick with five GxXs while Panasonic has two, LX100 and FZ1000.

I do not see the totally 7 can beat SONY RX10s and RX100s which is too bad as it will delay SONY to release new models, sensors such as HDR on chip...

Edited 28 seconds after posting

2 upvotes

Canon here has proven that there's more to a camera than a sensor. Even with the same sensor found in the RX100 series the GX5 still falls short. What a shame the camera has the looks.

1 upvote

"Inching forward" is a total misnomer.

"Millimeter Plodding" would be more accurate.

5 upvotes

I'm ok with "inching forward", which is certainly "damning with faint praise" :-;

This "Canon f.f. defector" was impressed by the ground-breaking circa-2008 sensor tech in the 5d2. Then disappointed by the 5d3/6d. Then "threw in the towel" when the underwhelming 5ds/r was announced. YMMV.

In the meantime, another manufacturer has been making "seven league boot strides" for several years now.

Edited 6 minutes after posting

0 upvotes

Survivors will be shot. Again. But if I will write more, I will get a(nother) warning from DPR. Bias? What bias? I speak nonsense, of course.

0 upvotes

It would be great to see a model with this body and the G3 X lens

3 upvotes

Sony's RX100 is on Version IV, and they still haven't discovered the Touch Screen. :-) Seriously, that is pretty backwards.

Edited 3 minutes after posting

9 upvotes

Yes I like the sony RX100's, I have an A6000 and don't understand why they don't have a touch screen. Still good cameras though.

0 upvotes

DPReview, would you consider adding a sensor coverage over focal length graph to fixed lens camera reviews?

To recap: some cameras achieve their focal length extremes only via dramatically reduced sensor coverage, relying on the usual digital correction to transform the image to the target size (e.g. at 24mm the FZ1000 uses approx 66% of its sensor to produce the final image; see http://www.dpreview.com/forums/post/54173076).

Considering the relatively small size and wide range of the Canon's lens, I'm guessing it's for the same reason that its output appears quite soft at certain FLs...

It can be argued that the proof of the output is in the viewing, or something to that effect, but I think this metric would be useful for other reasons to do with value for money and honesty in advertising: if a camera advertises a 20mp sensor but its lens generates only 13mp of data in its rival-beating wider FLs, you could easily argue you're getting less than you paid for.

1 upvote

For all these P&S, I like LX100's (as well as LX7, etc) approach that crops the sensor to allow for multi-aspect shooting with all can go down to 24mm.

As far as I can see, Pana LX line are the only line being doing that. not SONY RXs, or these Canon 1" cams

Edited 33 seconds after posting

0 upvotes

Total comments: 399

Editorial content

Product database

Community

About us Work for us Advertise with us FAQ Feedback Interest-Based Ads Privacy Legal

All content, design, and layout are Copyright © 1998 - 2016 Digital Photography Review All Rights Reserved. Reproduction in whole or part in any form or medium without specific written permission is prohibited.

Mobile site


Shooting with the Canon PowerShot G3 X Jul 27, 2015	Retro, refined: Fujifilm X100T reviewed Mar 25, 2015	Ricoh GR II: What's new and what does it mean? Jun 17, 2015	From another planet: Venus LAOWA 15mm F4 Wide Angle Macro quick review Mar 13, 2016

	No, what's film?
	I don't, but would if it weren't so expensive
	I don't, film is for hipsters
	I shoot the occasional roll
	I like to shoot a mix of film and digital
	I only shoot film, long live analog

112	Talent, vision and full dedication is all that matters!
81	Olympus f1.2 primes - will anyone be happy?
80	Who buy Pentax K-1, to take photographs in JPEG format ?
68	PART 2 This Week Through your m4/3 2016.03.12
62	Is it necessary to have focusing motor in lenses if I have it already in camera body?
59	GX8 Can Not Shoot Birds in Flight! Really? You Decide
58	What keeps you from accepting other peoples gear choice?
44	Pentax Jpeg Reds?
42	Multiple small capacity SD cards vs Large capacity
39	A7II? much worse than A7rII
39	The Sunday BIRD Volume 11 Issue No. 32, March 13, 2016
36	Trying to get baby skin right ...
35	New wave photographers and their outlook on photography - your take?
34	Why is the 'a7ii' shutter speed limited to 30 seconds
31	RX1 Arriving Today, A Shakespearian Question
31	Professionals should protect the industry
30	The Blue Bird of Happiness and the Olympus 300mm f4 + MC14
30	FF vs M43: Sony's worst zoom vs Olympus' best (with photos)
29	♣ ♣ Bootstrap's Sunday 'Scapes ♣ ♣ 13 March 2016
29	100% crop