elf kerben

In italy i would use 17-35/2,8 wide and normal photos and very good for night shots and the 85mm 1,4.

I had both, the D5500 without AF fine-tuning struggled with my 16-85 and 35/1.8DX. On other cameras these lenses worked fine. With AF-finetuning it would be a really good camera. The AF modul also ...

I sent it yesterday back. Maybe were will be a D5600 with swivel display and the AF-finetuning. If not i have other cameras.

All lenses are new, working on other DX bodies very well. On my D5500 i have back focus. Why should i send something to make the QC for Nikon? If i had AF fine-tuning in the D5500 body the problem...

The Nikon D5500 i had had, a really nice grip for my hands. OVF for action, not like my Panasonic LX100 EVF, were all action is gone. Handling with 16-85/3,5-5,6 is good, also with 35/1,8DX.

Yes...

So sorry Adobe, but now we must break. I don't follow you in the cloud. Affinity Photo/ designer and publisher and C1 seems the right way for my PS and Indesign/ illustrator, time to look outside,...

I was not happy with the 24-85 VR. Yes it is light, but thats all. Image Quality was poor at my standards.

Yes, the d800 or d810 have the same problem, i know if my d700 fails i must decide. The d750 is a nice camera and without years of d700, i would have keep it. But there are also a lot of other ...

Yes, coming form d700 to d750 i had the same problem. I sent the d750 back, problem solved, but i have the problem if my d700 break or with the 760 .... :)

I had a d750, but my d700 stayed. Yes some things are nice on the d750 but in the end, the overall package of the d700 was better for me.

Yes we live in a world, of peace and harmony and there are no wars and all people have enough to eat ...

... we do not have other problems, so this is a problem that really should be solved. :)

Long time ago, big churches in barcelona, Paris, Bruessel .. whatever were built to praise God and to show whats going on and how much money the city had ...

... now it turns to copyrights for...

We should not laugh, maybe the rest of the world follows. :) Copyrights over all, and take money where no man has gone. In our world full with lobbyists, banks and politicians is a lot more place...

because of weight? 480gr now and f2,8 constant 900gr?
because of price? 1100 money to 2200 money?

After a long time a real sign to DX from Nikon, yes. Faster than the old and same ca 480gr. Hope for d300+

Look at Nikon and thier DX-setup the last 3 years and then look to Fuji and think about it. :) Better a good lens, then a crippled one. Lens design and production maybe sometimes difficult, so for ...

I have the LX100, waited also long for such a camera from Nikon. So bought one and the qualitiy of build and pictures make me smile. Its very good in photo and video, so i dont need to upgrade my ...

I found the same. My d700 does a lot better job, if i need rely good AF, so the v3 was not and option to change from my v1. The v2 had some things better, but also a lot got worse from the not ...

I bought the LX100 after waiting for something like this from nikon, but for my V1 Nikon never released a fixed lens aka 35mm FF with VR. The LX100 is at 400g with this nice lens (1,7-2,8) and the...