Virtual Photon

I'll echo the comments above - Olympus USA is having a 20% off sale for the next several days and when I looked they had both M10's and M1's available. I also agree that the M10 and M1 image ...

Patience in the age of instant information? :-O My thoughts exactly.  Coming from Nikon, when the new 80-400 came out there were endless (mostly pointless) comparisons and it all boiled down to ...

I too have an essential tremor. I agree with Skeeterbytes above. More mass doesn't seem to dampen the jittering. My M10 is very good. My M1 works even better no matter which lens is on I assume ...

I actually think the camera is coping pretty well.  It IS a contrasty scene and if you look at the histogram, it is pretty well filled out with pretty minor blown highlights.  You can pull up the ...

These are from 2014 - OM10 w/ 14-140.  La Sagrada was extraordinary.

Ok. I can't speak to how well the 40-150 will play with the GX8 as I use it on an M1, but it is a sharp lens and you lose very little acuity when you add the MC14. But just to play devil's ...

You understand that the 40-150 + MC14 bumps you up to f4 right?

Ok, so RVC was kind enough to forward me some of the raw files which I processed in LR 5.7 and I think they are actually much better than they appear in these galleries.  The lens is certainly ...

Are you going to have a chance to use it in some good light?  Look, they are nice shots, and I'm hoping you can show some different conditions.

I have the 40-150 and MC14 and these shots don't look anything close to what I would expect.  I realize we are talking about ridiculously low shutter speeds for a 600 /840 mm lens and probably the ...

I've used the 64GB Sandisk with the EM-1 without a problem on a Macbook Pro running OS X.  I agree with the above poster that it is probably a Sandisk 64GB Windows XP problem.

The EM1 with the latest firmware offers a totally silent shutter as well.

Just what exactly are you unhappy with about it?  Sharpness?  Color?  Noise?  Grain?

I'm as interested in this lense as anyone but frankly at these reduced resolutions it is difficult to draw any hard conclusions.  Nice snaps though.

. . . and just which preposition were you not thinking of ending the sentence with? ;-) Sorry, the old English composition instructor in me couldn't resist.

There are differences certainly in ergonomics, in a slightly improved IBIS, and in the PDAF available on the EM1.  But I think the hi-res mode is the major difference.  If you need or want the ...

?  Why?  Same camera, same sensor, same exposure, just less resolution.  ISO performance should be identical between crop and full mode.

Nice shots.  Did you use a tripod or were these hand-held?

I have the 10.  It nicely fits the M10 with the standard lens (I have a Oly 25 which I think is about the same size).  It also just fits the m10 with the 40-150R (not the pro 2.8!) if you fit it ...

Ummm  maybe it's not that the camera is that big but his head is that small.