www.fgks.org   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

Article

Metz mecablitz 26 AF-1 Quick Review

Metz mecablitz 26 AF-1
$129 / £90 www.metz.de

The Metz mecablitz 26 AF-1 is a compact flash gun that's small compared to standard hotshoe flash units, but still a good deal larger than those that come in the box with most mirrorless cameras. Metz's aim in the mecablitz 26 AF-1 has been to find an effective balance between miniaturization and usefulness to suit users of small cameras, whether DSLR, mirrorless or advanced compact - many of which lack an on-board flash.

The built-in electronic flash made its debut just over fifty years ago on Voigtländer's Vitrona 'compact' camera, but by the 1980's the pop-up or window flash was a standard feature of small cameras from every brand. Since then practically every compact has come with a flash of some sort, and with the demise of the popular compact, smartphones have taken up the mantel – albeit with a popping bright light rather than a real electronic flash.

While plenty of DSLRs also have a built-in flash the feature has been oddly out of favor with the mirrorless manufacturers, whose drive for miniaturization has often left this useful device out in the cold. There are exceptions of course, with Panasonic's Lumix GH- and GX- range and Sony's a6000 and a5100 cameras sporting clever little fold-away heads, but in the main designers have chosen to save space rather than provide this utility. With the small batteries many of these cameras run on, perhaps a no-flash diet is a matter of health as much as bulk.

As compensation many brands supply their cameras with a tiny hotshoe gun (perhaps 'handbag pistol' rather than gun), but while these dinky devices indeed produce light and are small enough to carry anywhere, they tend to be pretty underpowered and miniaturization leaves them extremely close to the lens axis – especially on the smallest cameras. This is where the mecablitz 26 AF-1 is designed to step in.

Specifications / Key Features:

  • Olympus/Panasonic/Leica, Nikon, Canon, Pentax, Sony, Fujifilm, Samsung
  • Guide Number: GN20m@ISO 100 and 35mm lens (GN26 with tele adapter)
  • Colour Temperature: 5500K
  • Modes: Hotshoe TTL auto/manual, Slave TTL auto/manual
  • Coverage: 35mm - 24mm/85mm with wide and tele adapters
  • Tilt: 0-90°
  • In-camera display: Flash ready and correct exposure indicator in camera in hotshoe and slave modes
  • Connections: USB for firmware upgrades
  • Power: 2xAAA cells
  • Weight: 115g/4oz
  • Dimensions: 63x85x85mm/2.48x3.35x3.35in

How we view flash, and how we view compact system cameras overall, will determine whether we see the absence of a built-in flash unit in a positive or negative light, but there is no denying that there will be occasions when a burst of flash will be needed.

In Use

Most of the mini guns that come supplied with mirrorless cameras have a guide number of less than 10m at ISO 100, so the GN26@ISO 100 mecablitz 26 AF-1 offers a good deal more for those who prefer to keep their ISO low and their apertures small.

Another significant advantage of using this gun over the type generally supplied is the distance the source sits from the lens axis and the ability this unit offers to bounce its light from a ceiling. The head sits on a hinged body that offers a choice of click-stop angles at 0°, 20°, 40° and 90° to the lens axis.

This 0° position is designed for on-camera macro and close up work. The 90° setting aims the flash upward to bounce the light.

The first two positions are for on-camera macro and close-up work, while the 40° position is 'normal' and the 90° setting aims the flash upward when the camera is in landscape orientation and to the left or right when in portrait orientation. When in the normal position the middle of the head sits about 75cm/3in above the hot shoe, so on a DSLR-shaped mirrorless the light is a good distance from the lens axis.

The gun comes with a built-in flip-up wide angle diffuser, and a clip-on teleconverter in the box, giving us coverage options for 24mm, 35mm and 85mm focal lengths (full frame), while the guide number shifts from 14m/46ft to 20m/66ft to 26m/85ft at ISO 100. You might feel it is a bit of a con to call the unit the 26 AF-1 when the guide number of the naked head is actually 20m, and only 26m with the telephoto adapter – and I'd be inclined to agree.

The unit is very nicely made, and feels solid enough. It is a plastic body, but it doesn't creak too much and the hinge action is rugged and the buttons feel that they will last. I found the battery compartment unnecessarily awkward to open and close the first couple of times, but it wore smooth as I used it more. The manual quotes 100 flashes from a set of standard alkaline cells (2xAAA), 110 with NiMH batteries and 160 when using lithium. I used lithium batteries and found that at 300 exposures the cells were still going strong. Obviously not every burst was at full power, but this probably gives a better indication of battery life for normal photography.

While the Metz mecablitz 26 AF-1 is powerful enough to balance out hard shadows on a bright sunny day, owners of compact system cameras that don't feature an ISO 100 setting will find it a little more difficult to get the most out of the gun. I was using the Panasonic Lumix DMC-GX7 for this part of the test and, although it has a maximum flash sync speed of 1/320sec, its lowest real ISO setting of 200 meant using the sort of small apertures outside that render more background detail in focus than is ideal. I found myself looking for shade the whole time so I could get away from using f/11.

Filling in the shadows under the man's hat from a diffused-light courtyard at f/4 and 1/250 sec with -1 2/3EV exposure compensation, 0EV flash exp comp
Balancing the man in the shade with the brightly lit background at f/11 and 1/200sec with -2/3EV exp comp, 0EV flash comp

While it is difficult to make out the effects of flash exposure compensation when the gun is used in slow sync mode, the differences are there to be seen, however subtle. Without the influence of ambient light the work the flash is putting in becomes much more obvious. When the Metz was mixed with the built-in flash of the host camera again the effects are subtle, but they are supposed to be. Having the flexibility to operate the Metz in TTL or manual mode is extremely useful and opens the possibility to have widely varying power ratios.

Direct flash at f/6.3 and 1/125 sec with +1EV exposure compensation Bounce flash at f/6.3 and 1/125 sec with +1EV exposure compensation
Slow sync direct flash at f/6.3 and 1/50 sec with +1EV exposure compensation Slow sync bounce flash at f/6.3 and 1/50 sec with +1EV exposure compensation

For the white bluebell set-up shown below I was able to create a range of power ratios between the built-in flash of the Panasonic Lumix DMC-GH4 and the Metz meccablitz 26 AF-1. I used the gun in slave mode and controlled both the Metz and the built-in flash from the camera's menu system. Each of the two flashes are gifted up to +/-3EV of exposure compensation in TTL mode by the menu system, and when manual mode is selected the Metz can be adjusted from full power to 1/128th power in full stop steps. In the GH4 menu system the built-in flash can be set to communicate with the Metz but not actually fire during the exposure: a feature I made extensive use of.

Metz mecablitz 26AF-1 (background) and the Panasonic Lumix DMC-GH4. On-camera flash only.
Balanced with mecablitz flash from behind. Mecablitz flash from behind only.

The flash unit has user-updatable firmware, and while I was in possession of the test unit new firmware became available to make the gun compatible with the Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX100, DMC-FZ72 and Leica D-Lux cameras. Having downloaded a small program and the firmware itself, the process is easy if you can concentrate long enough to read the on-screen instructions. In my magical fantasy land it would be nice if we could switch firmware to allow the gun to be used with different camera brands. The gun is obviously not only for small cameras, though it is the smaller models that it suits best, as versions are available for all the main DSLRs too.

If you are into video you will appreciate the built-in LED light that outputs a maximum of 30 Lux/m and which is switchable to a lower setting. The light source is really pretty small so it creates hard shadows and squinting humans, and is thus somewhat less than ideal. It does make a handy focusing aid though in dim conditions for stills photographers.

While coverage from the video light is nicely even, the same can't really be said of the flash. The lens of the flash head seems quite large, but on closer inspection you can see that the light output area occupies only a fraction of the lens face. So the source and the mirror box are quite small, and the light has to pass through a dramatically scribed Fresnel lens.

The result is that the coverage is pretty uneven, with a dark wave at the bottom of the frame in wide angle shots when the diffuser isn't in place. Even with a 35mm lens the coverage isn't completely even, and the dark area still peeks into the bottom of the frame.

With the diffuser in place coverage is even enough for all but the most technical copying work – for which you wouldn't be using this kind of gun. A bright area appears across the middle of the frame, but it isn't drastic and in most natural subjects it will not be visible. The answer then is to use the diffuser most of the time. The tele converter is also less than perfectly smooth in its illumination, but again the variations in brightness are only really visible when you photograph a white wall in the lab to see if the illumination is even. In real life the slightly brighter stripes won't show up.

Summing Up

The Metz Mecablitz 26AF-1 is an extremely useful little gun. Small enough to carry in a pocket and to marry nicely with flat topped or prism styled compact system cameras, it is at the same time large enough to pack a decent punch and flexible enough to give some control. As a hotshoe gun it does just what it is supposed to do with consistent results, and with the ability to bounce it allows us to escape the harsh flat light of a direct burst.

It is out of the hotshoe though that this little gun comes into its own and becomes really useful to the creative photographer. The wireless control worked extremely well on most occasions, and proved perfect for macro and still life. A pair of these guns could be ideal for adding shining edges, backlit petals and some 3D modeling to plants, bugs and macro detail as well as for larger objects and portraits. The gun is easy enough to use in its own right - how fiddly it is to control is a matter for the menu system of your camera, not the gun itself.

It would be nice to have some swivel as well as the bounce, for upright portraits, and ideally I'd be able to adjust output individually when using more than one unit. However, when you look at power, convenience, size and features, overall the Metz mecablitz 26AF-1 makes a pretty attractive proposition that will lend an extra element of function and creativity to your small camera photography. And at $129/£90, it isn't too expensive either.

Pros:

  • Small and reasonably powerful
  • Great slave control for off-camera work
  • Body keeps source well away from lens axis
  • Four head positions

Cons:

  • No swivel function
  • Video light is hard
  • Not as powerful as the name suggests

Rating:

Buying Options

Panasonic Lumix DMC-GX7
From Amazon
Panasonic Lumix DMC-GH4
From Amazon

Comments

Comments

Total comments: 72
See more
rileybates

You know, i don't even know why I sometimes feel compelled to read the comments after a review. Someone takes time to review a product, and ends subjecting themselves to all sorts of ridiculous comments. I can't believe no one was able to find some grammatical error on the part of the author. If you have taken the time to read the article, why not just take away the information that is presented and leave your know-it-all comments in your head. "Did you see that, Joe? He called it a flash gun. I can't believe anyone could be so dumb. We are much smarter, we even know geometry and angles and stuff and can tell the difference between 75cm and 7.5cm". Grow up.
For what it's worth, thank you Damien for taking the time to review this product.

0 upvotes
CameraCarl

Any idea when this will be available in the US? It has been listed as "New Item -- Coming Soon" for well over three months at B&H and Adorama. (It may be six months. Regardless, it has been so long I've lost track.)

0 upvotes
photo perzon

Could it be any larger? Any bigger? Why bother?

0 upvotes
The Silver Nemesis

I think this small flash is useful, and above all, rather "discrete".

0 upvotes
_sem_

What kind of lithium batteries, Li-ion like Godox?

0 upvotes
_sem_

"In the GH4 menu system the built-in flash can be set to communicate with the Metz but not actually fire during the exposure"
And does it actually work like this, or one can still see some contribution when shooting into a mirror or sometimes in macro, like it happens with Nikon?

0 upvotes
iamphil

I can't help but think they should have sized it up just a little to make use of 2 AA instead of 2 AAA. AA cells are only 6mm longer and 4mm wider in diameter but 2.5x bigger in capacity. Battery swaps are annoying.

2 upvotes
Mike FL

This Metz is a small/weak flash, so I think AAA is fine as it can last more than the battery in the camera as seen from Damien Demolder that "I used lithium batteries and found that at 300 exposures the cells were still going strong".

I normally use rechargeable for Flash and LED Lightning with couple of backup. We can charge the rechargeable while charging the camera's battery in the end of the day.

2 upvotes
Goodmeme

re: apertures small in the context of increasing its suitability, don't you mean wide?

0 upvotes
Hawaii-geek

Does it come in a Sony MIS Hot Shoe version?

0 upvotes
Muqdad

Something doesn't sink in here guys. The review and the pictures imply that at 0° position the light direction points downwards at a certain angle, this being supported by the reviewer saying that the flash becomes on the "normal" position when it gets to 40°. I assume by "normal" the reviewer means straightly forward for direct flash illumination. Now someone help me get this: starting from this angle of 40° at which the flash is sending light straightly forward, when we tilt it up an additional 50° to reach 90°, how could it now direct its light straightly upwards? Don't we need a stroke of 90° to change from horizontal to vertical? If the reflector sends light horizontally while the body is tilted to the 40° position because it is built at an angle with the flash body as the pictures show, if the flash body moves the remaining 50° of its 90° stroke the light should now point to 50° upwards, not vertical. Am I missing something here?

3 upvotes
GodSpeaks

Nope, you got it.

0 upvotes
Muqdad

@GodSpeaks

You seem to have owned one of these as per an earlier comment of yours.

Is it true it won't point perfectly upwards? I'm out for one but this is a deal breaker for me..

Thank you in advance.

Muqdad

0 upvotes
GodSpeaks

Correct. The unit will not tilt back beyond the 90 degree mark, meaning the flash fires forward of straight up.

0 upvotes
sapporodan

Against the Olympus FL-300R which one is better? they seem evenly matched.
The Oly has a brighter guide No. of 28 at ISO200 (vs 20), but no zoom feature or video light.

I have the Olympus and was happily surprised to find it works perfectly on my GX7 including the remote triggering.

Comment edited 33 seconds after posting
0 upvotes
datiswous

Olympus FL300R has the same guidenr in iso100:
http://www.olympus.co.uk/site/en/c/cameras_accessories/pen_om_d_cameras_accessories/pen_om_d_flash_systems/fl_300r_1/fl_300r_specifications.html

I assume you get the same guide nr. on the Metz flash when using iso 200.

The coverage options are different though.
FL-300R: 18mm + 28mm.
26 AF-1: 24mm + 35mm + 85mm.
I think this Metz flash is probably overall more useful, although depending on the lenses you use.

0 upvotes
Mike FL

I have couple of Oly OEM flash including Olympus FL-300R, here is the difference between FL-300R and Metz:

1. FL-300R is more powerful as FL-300R's GN is 20m to ISO100 @28mm vs Metz 20m to ISO 100 @35mm.

2. Different coverage as datiswous indicated.

3. FL-300R has RC, but Metz has LED lighting

BTW: Oly and Pana share the same flash. Some Pana flash are just re-badged Oly, but higher price.

Comment edited 2 minutes after posting
0 upvotes
Mike FL

FWIW, people should check their Olympus FL-300R as there is an Recall.

http://www.olympusamerica.com/cpg_section/fl300r.asp

0 upvotes
datiswous

Thanks for the info

0 upvotes
Jacques Cornell

Lack of swivel is a major handicap. My preferred alternative for the same price is Metz' own 28 CS-2, a slave-only flash you can mount next to the camera or, better yet, hold in your left hand, and trigger with your camera's pop-up flash. It's got five auto and manual output levels going down to ISO 1600 @ f4. This is my "studio in a pocket", providing off-camera key light and on-axis fill.

0 upvotes
nnowak

Looks a lot like the Canon 270ex I use on my EOS M. Except, the Metz is bigger and not quite as capable.

0 upvotes
Mk7

Too, big, too limited and too expensive for what it is. IMHO, omitting the pop-up flash from so many of these mirrorless models is a mistake. I'm sure it's one factor contributing to low sales.

0 upvotes
Mike FL

Build in Flash is very useful that's may be one of the reason that SONY's millionairesses are always in the TOP of the Best Selling list.

http://www.amazon.com/gp/bestsellers/electronics/3109924011/ref=pd_zg_hrsr_e_1_4_last

0 upvotes
brendon1000

I love a pop up flash if only to act as a commander. However that isn't my primary condition to buying a camera but pretty low down in the list of my requirements.

0 upvotes
pannumon

Most of the mirrorless ILC have built-in flash or a small separate flash that is bundled with the camera (e.g. Olympus). IMHO, there is no need to replicate that. I see a market for a bit more powerful flash, like this Metz, though.

1 upvote
Mike FL

If my bag has space, I carry two flash even while I carry a camera having pop-up flash; one has less power like this Metz. but I still use pop-up flash some time b/c pop-up flash is:
- very convenient
- very weak that all I need.

Comment edited 2 times, last edit 1 minute after posting
0 upvotes
GodSpeaks

I just received one for my Panasonic cameras. It is a nice little unit. The biggest problem is the 2xAAA batteries as a power source, especially if you want to do more than occasional shooting.

The unit has a microUSB port for updating firmware. It would be soooo nice if one could attach a LiIon USB battery pack to supply power in lieu of the AAA's. Unfortunately, not possible.

3 upvotes
BartyLobethal

Why is it a "gun"? Is it not a flash?

0 upvotes
TriezeA72

A good option for pentax k-3 II users

1 upvote
Mark9473

I bought this flash unit a few months ago when it came out, and use it on my Olympus E30 DSLR. It is just perfect for its intended use - a small TTL flash you can always have in your camera bag. Works really well for fill in flash. I'm now looking to buy the same unit for my Canon G1X.II but they appear to be out of stock in the places I've looked.

1 upvote
rfsIII

You can, of course, soften the video light by taping a "diaper" of tracing paper in front of it. Those little lights should be used mainly for filling in the shadows on people's faces and adding sparkle to eyes, not for illuminating whole scenes.

0 upvotes
AngryCorgi

Did I miss the test of the cycle time? I would have thought that would be included in a review. Surely I read past it without noticing it.

2 upvotes
tt321

I did not remember seeing it either. That makes the two of us.

1 upvote
Mike FL

I do not have this particular Metz, but "cycle time" will be impacted by (rechargeable) battery type.

It would be useful if the reviewer can list the first hands' "cycle time" for different (rechargeable) battery type.

Also, if the reviewer can measure the TRUE GN b/c I have not seen a flash mfc is understate its GN (just like I have not seen a Camare mfc is understate its sensor ISO).

Comment edited 4 times, last edit 14 minutes after posting
1 upvote
JEROME NOLAS

Looks almost same like flash for EOS-M and it's ugly too...

0 upvotes
Combatmedic870

Forgot fuji that also has flash in their xa,xm,xe series. One of the reasons I stay with xe series.

0 upvotes
agentlossing

This review was good enough to have me considering this flash, although I may wait and see what more people are saying about it (only one - one-star - review on Amazon, for instance), and to see if the price drops at all. $100 seems like a more realistic price point.

0 upvotes
YetiYeti

> When in the normal position the middle of the head sits
> about 75cm/3in above the hot shoe

Huh, check your unit conversion software. Perhaps 7.5 cm

1 upvote
wetracy

A flash unit is not a gun. Stop calling it that!

7 upvotes
tt321

It's remarkable what can get called guns. At airport security once they confiscated a laser pointer from me calling it a laser gun.

2 upvotes
Damien Demolder

I didn't coin the term 'flashgun' - it was very commonly used already, and has been for many years. The 'gun' postfix helps to identify the type of flash, so we know that it isn't a studio 'flash head', for example. 'Flash unit' only tells us that there is one flash, not what type it is.
I'm sorry if you don't like the term 'gun', or that we 'fire' or 'trigger' a flashgun, but there's not too much I can do about terms that have been in use for longer than I have been alive.

5 upvotes
zakk9

While I agree that the word has been in use for a long time, it is totally unnecessary. Flash says it all. It's a light that flashes as opposed to a permanent light sources. The size decides if it's a unit for studio use or not, and studio flashes are mostly called strobes anyway.

3 upvotes
Rick Stirling

A Metz 60 CT-4 with an ISO 100/FT GN of 197 is a 'flash gun'. This device really doesn't deserve the appellation 'gun' it's more of a 'fill flash' ;-)

Comment edited 1 minute after posting
1 upvote
wetracy

Nowhere that I've seen on the Metz site do they refer to a flash as a "gun." Manufacturers do not want any association with that term as it may carry legal implications. For photography, I consider it a colloquial term that is unprofessional. It is mostly out of fashion, but once in a while I see someone dredge it up for who knows what reason. Please write more carefully.

1 upvote