www.fgks.org   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

Article

Hands on with the Pentax 645Z

Hands on with the Pentax 645Z

Ricoh Imaging's Pentax 645Z is the newest entry into the digital medium format world. Medium format camera sales have been slipping since the days of film (and the rise of full-frame digital), and Ricoh hopes that the 645Z will reverse that trend.

The 645Z finds itself amongst some very pricey competitors, both of which use the same 50MP Sony sensor (with no AA filter, as you'd expect). The Hasselblad H5D-50C camera and Phase One IQ250 digital back have retail prices of $29,000 and $37,000, respectively - several times greater than the $8,499 MSRP of the 645Z. Pentax's experience with consumer DSLRs has allowed them to give the 645Z a larger ISO range, more sophisticated AF system, faster burst rates, and video recording - all of which the other cameras lack (though they have their own advantages, too).

That consumer-friendliness means it can also be seen as a rival to high-resolution DSLRs such as Nikon's D800E. It's not so readily hand-holdable, but it does make a 36MP full frame sensor suddenly sound less impressive.

The camera will be sold in a body-only kit for $8499.99 / £6799.99 or with a 55mm F2.8 lens for £7699.99. You can pick up a 645Z for yourself in late May. To put this in perspective, this is a around 17% less expensive than the existing, CCD-based 645D was, at launch.

We've been lucky enough to spend some time with a pre-production 645Z, and have some first impressions to share on the following slides.

Sensor and autofocus

The 645Z uses the same 51MP medium format Sony CMOS sensor as the Hasselblad and Phase One cameras mentioned on the previous slide. This monster has dimensions of 43.8 x 32.8mm and a pixel pitch of 5.3 microns. To keep dust off of the sensor, the 645 uses Pentax's Dust Reduction II ultrasonic cleaning system.

Keeping with its predecessors, the 'Z' uses the 645AF2 mount, which is backward-compatible with 645AF and 645A lenses, too. With an optional adapter, classic Pentax 67 lenses can be used as well. The crop factor this medium format camera is 0.79x, so a 55mm prime acts as an archetypal 'normal' lens - equivalent to 43mm in 35mm terms. Pentax currently has sixteen FA 645 lenses available.

As you'll see, the 645Z has inherited quite a bit from the K-3 DSLR - making it one of the easiest medium format cameras to simply pick up and use. One of the most significant is the SAFOX 11 autofocus system, which has 27 points (25 of which are cross-type). Compare that to 11-points on the 645D, and even fewer on the Hasselblad and Phase One cameras. The result is really impressive autofocus, in both good and low light.

Given that it's a medium format camera, you know that the 645Z is going to have a large mirror. As could also conclude that the noise from this mirror would be pretty loud. And while you'll certainly notice, we were surprised to see that the 645Z's shutter is actually quieter than the one on the Sony A7r. In terms of durability, the shutter is rated for 100k cycles.

Top down

If you own a Pentax (or any other DSLR) then many of the controls you can see here will look familiar. The mode dial has the same exposure modes that Pentaxians have come to know and love, including sensitivity priority (Sv), and shutter and aperture priority (TAv). There are dials for switching between AF-S and AF-C focusing, as well as still and video shooting. That's right - the 645Z can record video, at up to as 1080/30p with stereo sound. It's currently the only medium format camera that can do so.

The 645Z has the requisite top-mounted LCD, which displays a plethora of information. There are also direct buttons for numerous features, and there are even more on the back of the camera. As you'd expect from a camera in this class, there are front and rear control dials.

The hot shoe is one of two ways in which the 645Z can connect to an external flash, with the flash sync port being the other. The X-sync speed on the camera is 1/125 sec.

Another tripod mount, please

Medium format cameras can spend a lot of time shooting portraits, which is why there's a second tripod mount on its left side. Here you'll also find the 645Z's dual memory card slots, with its I/O ports below it. In addition to stereo mic, HDMI, and DC-in ports, the 645Z offers a USB 3.0 'SuperSpeed' connector. This isn't so impressive by medium format standards - where fast connections are more prevalent - but is rare in consumer cameras.

Speaking of super speed, the 'Z' can take quite a few shots in burst mode, which is all the more impressive when you consider its resolution. At full resolution (that's over 50 megapixel) the 645Z can shoot at 3 fps until it hits its limit of around 30 JPEG, 10 Raw, or 12 TIFF images.

While the 645Z doesn't have built-in Wi-Fi, it does support the strangely named 'FluCard', which allows for wireless remote control and image retrieval.

Big grip

With a weight of 1550g (55oz), the 645Z is a hefty camera - and that's without a lens attached. The grip on the 645Z is extremely 'deep', which makes the camera surprisingly easy to hold. You could, in theory, shoot one handed, but it's probably in your best interest not to.

The body is made of magnesium alloy and feels incredibly durable. No corners were cut on the 645Z (no pun intended), with zero cheap-feeling parts. The dials have a rubberized coating, which makes them easier to grip. 

One thing yet to be mentioned is the 645Z's weather-sealing. Seventy six seals keep dust and moisture outside, and the 'Z' can be used in temperatures as low as -10C/+14F.

The only items of note here are a port for an optional wired remote, as well as a dial for mirror lockup. 

Moving upward

Another upgrade from the 645D is the addition of an articulating LCD. The display can be pulled quite a ways back from the body, and then tilted upward roughly 120 degrees, or down by 45 degrees - nice for working in the landscape orientation but oddly awkward for a camera with a portrait orientation tripod socket. The LCD - 3.2" in size - has 1.04M dots, and is comparable to that of other high-end interchangeable lens cameras.

As you'd expect, the trapezoidal prism optical viewfinder is large, with a magnification of 0.62x with the 55mm and 0.85X with the 75mm lenses. The viewfinder covers 98% of the frame. Focus screens are interchangeable, as one would expect. The rubberized ring around the viewfinder handles diopter correction.

Something that really impressed us is just how well implemented live view is on the 645Z. It feels just like the best interchangeable lens cameras out there, with a fast refresh rate, respectable contrast AF, face detection, and the aforementioned video recording feature.

This looks familiar...

If it wasn't for the huge optical viewfinder, then you might mistake the 645Z for one of Pentax's APS-C digital SLRs. While the 645 has a few more buttons, the core elements are nearly the same as those on the K-3. For those who have used that camera (or earlier models), muscle memory alone will allow you to get up and shooting right away. Even if you're not a Pentax owner, this is much more like using a consumer DSLR than most of its rivals.

Same goes for the menu system. For better or for worse, the menus look the same as they did on Pentax cameras from (at least) ten years ago. Everything is well laid-out, but the design remains very basic.

Wrap up

The Pentax 645Z is Ricoh Imaging's attempt to bring medium format photography back from the dead, and something that advanced amateurs might pick up instead of a full-frame DSLR. With a price so much lower than its peers, the 645Z makes medium format seem almost mainstream - and certainly a credible rival to high-resolution DSLRs such as Nikon's D3X or D800E.

Perhaps the most endearing feature of the 645Z is that it operates just like a 'regular' interchangeable lens camera. Those with Pentax DSLRs should have no trouble getting up and running, and owners of other brands' cameras won't be far behind. There are going to be some handling differences, of course, and shooting with a medium format camera is a bit different than a DSLR. 

Ricoh is hoping that both seasoned professionals and advanced amateurs who want to experience medium format photography will find the 645Z to be both an accessible and inexpensive way to get their foot in the door.

Buying Options

Pentax 645Z
From Amazon

Comments

Comments

Total comments: 684
See more
Marksphoto

images from DSLR's are already clean and sharp enough for just about every single use you can think of...

What's the point of this camera?

0 upvotes
jkjond

It offers a different feel and way of working, something that won't come across from a written product overview. The image quality differences may be minimal, but for some uses that makes it invaluable.

1 upvote
DPJoe2

My favorite camera of all time was an Ashai/Pentax 6x7 film camera. That's 2.25" x 2.75" negative size. 120/220 film size. 105mm f2.4 standard lens. I paid a whopping $279.50 for it including the lens in 1970. I know inflation is at least 10x by now so I'm willing to offer $2750 for a new updated one with the same basic body, which was giant 35mm, with a sensor the same size as my negatives were, not that postage stamp size thing in the 645Z. Now THAT will be a killer MF. Hurry up Penatax I'm old, can't wait forever.

Comment edited 2 times, last edit 2 minutes after posting
2 upvotes
IvanM

Imo, its a pity the camera is so ugly....the Mamiya ZD & AFD and Leica S/S2 are much nicer looking bodies...of course looks have nothing to to with image quality and handling, .... but I'm just saying...

Comment edited 1 minute after posting
0 upvotes
turvyT

dpr is just against Pentax. Or they favor other brands, word it as you want. I'm not a Pentax user or a Pentax fan (Leica and Hassel user), but that's simply obvious. It would be interesting to know why.

3 upvotes
Kfrog

I've always thought that. I am a Pentax user and i noticed it always takes them longer to post reviews of Pentax cameras than most other brands. They are so pro Canikon here that it's ridiculous.

1 upvote
Al Valentino

They are also pro Sony

2 upvotes
ZJ24

As others have said, there's a review of this Pentax here [link below]. Given its price for a medium format 50MP sensor, autofocus for that format, adjustable LCD, I'm staggered that there's no full review of this camera on DPR, and that DxO are ignoring it. I'm a Nikon shooter but come on guys, 50MP medium format for under $10K? If it was a Nikon, Canon or Sony the reviewers would be all over it. Or is the idea that it might threaten the overinflated prices for 35mm DSLRs by suggesting that 35mm might not actually be the largest viable format out there?

https://luminous-landscape.com/pentax-645z-in-depth-review/

8 upvotes
davidkachel

It probably has more to do with not threatening the other medium format cameras that approach the cost of a small house, for a throwaway camera.
As long as cameras are disposable and absurdly costly, there won't be a lot of high end cameras sold.

0 upvotes
BillOre

I owned the film version and multiple lenses. Flat out it was the best camera I have ever owned. There is something special about a Pentax and the 645 had it all. When I had the opportunity to photograph some famous people (Johnny Depp, Charlie Sheen, Patti Kim) they all wanted to know about the camera and were very cooperative.

4 upvotes
valdormar

If it where Canon they would not even give a review , lust like the 1D X.

0 upvotes
bossa

Dx0 aren't reviewing this camera - "it's not in our road map". I suspect DPR won't either.

The biased review sites usually wait until their favoured brands bring out a competing product so they can dig the boot in don't they?

...just saying ;)

1 upvote
onlooker

"The biased review sites" -- Spoken like a true fanboy. How many 645Z cameras have been sold?

1 upvote
RStyga

Where is the review DPR??

Oh well, in the meantime here's the review by the masterful Ming Thein (in two parts):

http://blog.mingthein.com/2014/06/27/review-the-pentax-645z-part-i/

http://blog.mingthein.com/2014/06/29/review-the-pentax-645z-part-ii-medium-format-shootout/

0 upvotes
Jonathan F/2

I'd switch "masterful" with "sleep inducing" as I find his photography way boring!

0 upvotes
hookah

it's my understanding that to have a larger sensor the lens has to be further from the sensor...correct??...why then are the camera companies making bulky,wide flat-body cameras that can only handle a certain size sensor?..why dont they move away from old film-style flat-body cams and make them longer and narrower to accommodate a larger sensor and maybe larger sensor cams can be cheaper and smaller...anyone??

1 upvote
Francis Carver

They do. It's called MEDIUM FORMAT cameras.

0 upvotes
ecube

I will not buy this camera ONLY because I do not have a need for MF because I am too old to carry heavier camera.

I have had Asahi Pentax in the 1960s and have always been impressed by the Takumar lenses. I also like the feel of the original Asahi Pentax in my hand.

To me, Pentax 645Z is a WINNER.

1 upvote
Kfrog

I have two Pentax film cameras (Spotmatic, ME Super) and two DSLR's (K10D, K-5II) and they are all outstanding cameras. The feel of the K-5II is superior in hand. Small and solid. Had a chance to test out a 645Z twice in store and the photos in can produce are fantastic. Wish I could afford one.

0 upvotes
ecube

While I did settled on Nikon, I started with Spotmatic in the very early 1960s. The bayonet style mount of Nikkor lenses versus the screw mount of Asahi Pentax was the deciding factor. Regardless, I always am impressed by the Pentax products. I hope you find some extra greens for you to get the 645Z.

0 upvotes
birdseed007

DPREVIEW you are a disgrace!! This camera is state of the art and has been out for months and yet you haven't reviewed it - why not???

How much do Nikon and Canon pay you to promote their products so quickly (you've already featured the new EOS 5DS and it's not even launched yet!!!)

If you're going to promote yourself as a leading photo site at least have the integrity to review products that are truly game changing and revolutionary in photography rather than seeking to brush them under the carpet.

Quite frankly I thought control of information to influence the population was something that only happened in the middle East today or Germany in the 1930's but it appears to be alive and well here too...

For all those who want to read an informative review of this world beating camera see: http://www.luminous-landscape.com/reviews/cameras/a_pentax_645z_diary.shtml

15 upvotes
Nikonandmore

There is a pathetic plot against the 645z. People are afraid and in my opinion getting paid to look the other way. DXO has ALL resources in the world to get a 645z on hand and test it. They test almost overnight everything else when they come out.. look at the latest Sonys and Nikons. Equally, its clear they forcefully DO NOT support he 645z on their Optics Pro 9.x app. They release updates almost instantly when a new camera comes out to support it.. but not the 645z. And then there is Phase One, that instead of making better products and innovate as a way to face the competition, they choose instead to block support for the 645z because it uses the same sensor and their aging triple priced cameras with the same sensor. Ridiculous. As for DXO, they are pathetic. Ive used my 645z now for several months along with Lightroom to develop the RAWs. Best camera Ive ever owned, IQ, ergonomics.. everything. Period.

8 upvotes
davco9200

Would love to see a more in-depth review of this camera, especially with lenses. As a Canon shooter, I am really unfamiliar with Pentax glass characteristics and even less familiar with Pentax Medium Format glass. I did some googling but nothing really comprehensive comes up. Suggestions? Is DPReview going to do a full review of it?

7 upvotes
Kfrog

Tested a 645Z at Houston Camera Exchange with the 90mm f/2.8 macro lens and I can tell you it is a fantastic combination. Luminous-Landscape is pretty good with 645Z coverage.

0 upvotes
Stan43

Just received my 645Z this week. I purchased with the 55 2.8,120F4 Macro and the new 28-45 Zoom. My first impressions are that it's a fantastic camera. I will be selling most of my Canon gear. I have decided to go Pentax MF and Fujifilm for my professional and casual shooting respectively. I will post some pics on Flikr when I get a chance.

7 upvotes
AbrasiveReducer

The more things change...as usual, bigger is better. But better is bigger and costs a lot more. Did anyone expect this camera would perform worse than a Nikon? Gold award.

0 upvotes
aris14

I always liked the IQ of the big Pentax back from the days I had seen its performance with a Phase 1 back plate (some few pieces).
I also like its shape.
It would be nice to see how it compares to Leica S1 just for the shake of the comparison.
These cams are aimed for high quality works and only few pros have the opportunity to enjoy their performance where it really counts.

Comment edited 1 minute after posting
1 upvote
TheHossein

i was thinking to save for a 5D III over my 7D but now after reading this im thinking to wait more and get this, cuz most of the times im shooting outdoors but at night with NO lights on, it costs about 1dx a bit more in that range but has huge advantages over it, i guess it worth waiting more,

3 upvotes
phoenix15

Read this:
http://www.luminous-landscape.com/reviews/cameras/a_pentax_645z_diary.shtml

0 upvotes
TheHossein

@phoenix15 ive read this too. thanks :)

0 upvotes
GaryJP

Wait A LONG TIME more, unless independently wealthy.

0 upvotes
Sdaniella

previous 645D iterations only had AutoGain (auto-ev0) LV for framing/focus (no fulltime exposure simulation live preview whatsoever) or ESLV

I take it, with only an exposure menu being displayed on the new 50MP Z model, ESLV remains absent, and AGLV for F+F continues on ... happy metering/chimping. Pentax dSLRs only have AGLV for F+F, and not ESLV, so the 645Z should be very familiar.

at least Nikon had the sense to include partial/restricted fulltime ESLV for its D800 hi-MP series dSLRs.

Comment edited 4 minutes after posting
0 upvotes
Bev Pettit

Is there a AF teleconverter available for the 645Z yet? Thanks!

0 upvotes
Bev Pettit

I just bought this camera and am awaiting delivery. Can anyone suggest a really good prime or zoom telephoto lens for the 645z? I'm thinking somewhere in the 150-300 or 330 prime range. Thanks!

Comment edited 30 seconds after posting
1 upvote
bossboyali

Cool camera;

0 upvotes
KE Photo

Just signed up on DP review. Seriously considering this camera. I have been a working pro for 25+ years. I'm not really familiar with Pentax lenses.

Here is my question, I'd like to look at purchasing some "older" lenses to work with this 645Z for starters. I'd like a range from wide to telephoto. Can someone with Pentax knowledge guide me to which lenses to look for and which to avoid.

This camera sounds outstanding! A very appealing price to step into MF digital.

Thank you in advance

Kevin

0 upvotes
Pantyhose Bandit

51 megapixels. 8256 x 6192 pixels. It's $8.5K and the 36mp Nikon D800 is 3K. Is the extra $5.5K really justified by the extra 15 megapixels?

How big is big enough? A magazine centerfold is about 11 inches by 28 inches. Given that magazines do not print at a very high resolution, theres's plenty wasted pixelage on the D800. On the 645 even more pixels are wasted and the image is the wrong dimension because the 645 is 4:3. A centerfold is 11:28 which is closer to 3:2.

Billboards have the lowest resolution of all. Newspapers have pretty low resolution too due to the paper they're printed on.

This looks to me more like Ricoh trying desperately to bring out something expensive to make them more money without actually benefiting the consumer too much.

0 upvotes
ajn075

IMHO the $5.5K extra is justified by the medium format sensor, regardless of the pixel count. If pixel count is all that matters, people should save money and get a Lumia 1020 with 41 MP instead of a DSLR. It's the format that matters.

23 upvotes
JJ Rodin

Hello! Pixel size, bet this has VERY lovely output!

A Med. DSLR, what's not to like if you can afford/justify?

I hope it can use old lens! That's the main issue.
Enjoy lucky owners !!!!

0 upvotes
Fletcher8

Some people just won't get it, its not just about the pixels, its about the look of Medium Format.

3 upvotes
Brian Krecik

Stop thinking in pixel quantity and start thinking in size of the sensor. A larger sensor mean more light that can be captured and a larger image from the get-go. This equates into less fringing and smoother transitions. The same can be said for 4x5 and 8x10 cameras. The larger the image the better the overall quality of the final print.

3 upvotes
jackzuckerphotography

so quantify the "look" of medium format. Post some pictures showing the increased dynamic range or some other quantifiable justification for it. Not disputing the value. Just want to see some concrete data other than "the look" and "the format"

1 upvote
Pantyhose Bandit

Agreed. At 11x9 there's not much to choose between well exposed an processed images from any format including cellphones.

1 upvote
Galbertson

To Joephoto,
Thanks for your positive experience. Are you aware, or have you tested, the IQ differences of 645/67 manual film lenses against newer FA/DFA lenses? I own 55mm, 75mm, 105mm, and 165mm in 67 system. I also have from 645n, 45mm, 55mm, 120mm, and 200mm, all "A" lenses. I am curious if these lenses adequate to fully use resoluing power of 645Z, or would i need to consider investing in the newer lenses?
Thanks!

0 upvotes
Michael Piziak

This is bound to be a hit for Pentax, especially since the competition [Hasselblad & Mamiya] cost so much more.

1 upvote
Joefoto1

FYI, for all you Pentax 67 users out there, you can buy a 67 to 645 adapter for $150 and use all of your 67 lenses on the New 645z as well as any other pentax 645 body out there, and I will tell you from years of experience and owning both the 645d and now the new Z model , they work incredible, and will give you gallery quality images even at 40x60 on fuji flex with acrylic, I prefer it to the Hasselblad and the Phase cameras ,which I have tested, as the Pentax is much for fun to work with, and a lot more user friendly even for working pros like myself that make a living shooting images. There are a few places out there that do rent them, and that is always a great way to test it for yourself, once you use it , you will not want to work with any other camera, the files are stellar!!!

6 upvotes