www.fgks.org   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

Article

Mono a mono: Leica M Monochrom (Typ 246) hands-on

Leica's new Monochrom M camera brings the black-and-white-only concept up to date and into line with the technological advantages of the latest M (Typ 240) and M-P cameras. The main changes in Leica's latest M-series models are a switch from the previous CCDs to 24MP CMOS sensors, and thus the introduction of live view, a new buffer to speed the processing along and a much better rear screen.

With modern Leicas you have to look pretty closely to know which one is in front of you. The M Monochrom (Typ 246) has been designed very much in the style of the latest M models, with the distinctive curved corners and a very solid build. As expected, the top deck and base plates are machined from solid blocks of brass, while the body is made from magnesium alloy. 

The top-plate is free of any embellishment, and there isn't a red dot to be seen anywhere – or even a Leica logo – so the camera is very low-profile and designed not to stand out. The chrome black finish is nicely matte too, and contributes to the overall understated concept. The only written clue to the exact model you're holding is the word 'Monochrom' etched in black into the black hotshoe guides. 

While a comparison with the M (Typ 240) is obvious, the new model is actually more like a black and white version of the M-P. The buffer has a capacity of 2GB and Leica has included a guide frame selection switch on the front of the body - a throwback to the film era M-series rangefinders. The camera accepts focal lengths of 16mm to 135mm, and couples the viewfinder guidelines to display 35mm/135mm, 28mm/90mm and 50mm/75mm simultaneously.

The guide frame selection switch simply allows you to preview the field of view of a different focal length without switching lenses. 

The camera inherits the exposure compensation button from the M (Typ 240) and wears it in exactly the same place. This is a great improvement over the original Monochrom, which made finding exposure compensation pretty awkward without customization. It might be my imagination, but the button seems easier to use than I remember it being on the M (Type 240). Either way, it is a good spot to place it.

The viewfinder is much the same as we would expect from a modern M, though I'm told that the rangefinder mechanism is more durable and less susceptible to knocks, drops and jolts than some of the previous models. The system is 'locked down' more securely, meaning that there is less requirement for adjustment, since we're told it was calibrated using a live feed from the sensor. 

The effective base length is the same 47.1mm as it was on the original Monochrom, with a mechanical length of 69.25mm and a viewfinder magnification of 0.68x. The built-in eyepiece lens is 0.5dpt, but others, from -3 to +3, are available. 

A really significant improvement over the original Monochrom is the rear screen. Replacing the 2.5" 230k dot model of the first camera is a 3" 921,600 dot LCD that is protected with a crystal sapphire glass cover and which provides a viewing angle of 170 degrees. This allows the detail that the camera can capture to be more readily appreciated on the back of the camera, while a non-reflective coating makes viewing in bright conditions more achievable. 

The camera takes the same lithium-ion BP-SCL2 7.4V 1800mAh cell as the M (Type 240) and M-P: not the same 3.7V 1860mAh BP-SCL1 cell as used by the original Monochrom, the M8, M8.2, M9 and M9-P. The new cell is very slightly more expensive, but critically, current Monochrom users will need new spares if they are to upgrade. 

With the baseplate removed the Leica M-Multi-Functional Handgrip can be attached using the contacts in the bottom of the camera. This allows, among other features, GPS tracking, external power supply, X-sync flash connection, USB connection to a PC and an additional hotshoe should the camera's hotshoe be occupied with a viewfinder. The original Monochrom is not compatible with this handgrip. 

Metering is handled via reflective measurements from a set of strips across the first curtain – as is common with Leica rangefinders. In normal shooting mode this allows a center-weighted metering set-up. With Live View activated, the Monochrom (Type 246) adds spot and multi-area configurations to its functions. 

The camera features a new 24MP CMOS sensor that has no color filter array and no low pass filter. The lack of colored filters increases the amount of light that reaches the photodiodes compared to a filtered sensor, and thus the lowest ISO setting the camera offers is ISO 320. 

As before, the camera records DNG Raw files and JPEGs, simultaneously or individually. DNG files measure a maximum of 5976 x 3992 pixels, while JPEGs are 5952 x 3968 pixels. We have the option to save DNG files with or without compression, with a maximum compressed size of 34.5MB per image. 

The original Monochrom uses an 18MP CCD sensor. 

As with the M (Type 240) the Monochrom (Type 246) is capable of recording motion pictures – albeit in black and white, of course - in HD resolution at 24/25fps. Files are stored as Motion JPEGs, and recording is activated and stopped via the dedicated button next to the shutter release on the camera's top plate. 

The Monochrom (Type 246) has also inherited the rear layout of the M (Type 240), and gains a thumb wheel at the top right of the body and has lost the scrolling rear wheel of the original model. This is a much easier control arrangement to use quickly. 

In Live View mode there are two modes of assistance for focusing – a magnified view and peaking. Users can combine the two modes, as shown here. Peaking comes in red, green and blue flavors, though each of the colors stands out particularly well against the black and white images on screen. 

Shown here is the Summicron-M 35mm F2 lens finished in the new chrome black, but the Monochrom (Type 246) is also compatible with the company's R lenses, via an adapter. Chipped modern lenses record their focal length in the EXIF data and can automatically trigger manual focus assistance modes when used in Live View. 

The only place you'll find the word 'Leica' is across the back of the camera – along with 'Made in Germany'. There is an accessory port just below the hotshoe that accepts a microphone adapter and an electronic viewfinder. When the hotshoe cover is in place a rubber pad covers the port, completing the camera's weather proof credentials. 

As with other modern M cameras, the Monochrom (Type 246) has a maximum flash sync speed of 1/180sec and offers +/- 3 1/3 EV flash exposure compensation. Flash units can be used directly in the hotshoe or off-camera via an SCA adapter and cable. 

Buying Options

Leica M Monochrom (Typ 246)
From Amazon

Comments

Comments

Total comments: 709
See more
pedromeyer

Ever wondered why people buy luxury brand watches, that only tell time? A LEICA camera next to a Rolex, really looks like a bargain, plus you can earn an income using it, try doing that with a Cartier watch.

0 upvotes
pedromeyer

I figured that with film every frame would cost me approx one dollar, taking into account the film, processing and contact sheets. Well, with today's reality that none of this costs extra, I amortize my LEICAs in about 60 days of shooting. After that it's all free cash flow, ever thought of looking at the cost of a camera in that way?

0 upvotes
Chris Suton

This is not all that complicated. Why do people think they can recommend a 'one size fits all' camera for everyone ?
If you love B&W, love the solid tank like build of Leica and you have oodles of cash then you're not going to care about the cost and this is probably the camera for you. If you're a serious (and loaded) amateur it will give you pleasure. If you're a professional who solely works in B&W it will produce the goods.

If you don't fall in to those categories there are better options. Personally I do like B&W but don't want to be limited to it, so it's not for me. There is no perfect camera for everyone.

2 upvotes
User8894381729

Hi friends

anybody compare mono 246 vs 240 or sony 7R in B&W fotoz ?

Comment edited 2 times, last edit 11 minutes after posting
0 upvotes
James2431

User88...

See here. http://www.reddotforum.com/content/2015/06/bw-iso-showdown-leica-m-monochrom-typ-246-vs-m-monochrom-m9-vs-m-typ-240/

0 upvotes
Lassoni

How is this thing any better than GX8? That lens looks a little bit like the panleica 15mm

0 upvotes
GeorgeD200

Well, it has 3.84x the sensor area, and doesn't use a Bayer pattern to predict color. It also has an optical rangefinder. Frankly, it will kick the snot out of a GX8 for B&W.

0 upvotes
picsnmorepics

Just spent a couple of hours with x100 f/8, 1/250s, mf@15 ft, autoISO on the streets of Chicago. B&W ok; shooting experience on silent mode excellent. But not a fully M result. I used to shoot Leica M and eventually said no to film & Leica. I really miss the overall M result and experience. I've never found a replacement for a 50mm Summilux. The x100 is quieter and strobe with leaf shutter is more flexible. The 35mm Summicron would be my choice at all apertures and 24MP trump 12 or 16 plus plus you can bump up the effective M sensor count because mono doesn't put any filters over the sensor. It's just not in the realm of my possibilities but I will certainly be searching for the results from this unique and amazing tool.

1 upvote
darngooddesign

Pffft...total X100T clone. /s

2 upvotes
The Davinator

really?

Comment edited 2 minutes after posting
0 upvotes
darngooddesign

Totally, just compare them. Fuji has been making the X100 since 2011 so you'd think Leica would have noticed. Must have been an intentional decision to style it like the X100. /s

0 upvotes
The Davinator

There is more to this than design.....with the Mono....it's anout the sensor. Maybe I'm not understanding you.

0 upvotes
darngooddesign

http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=%2Fs

0 upvotes
The Davinator

LMAO....I didnt even notice the /s.....

2 upvotes
HFaria1957

This camera is so great as it is the M240.

0 upvotes
Andina

looks lovely and even though I can afford it I wont, but certainly I wont blame other people who do because if I were, I would also blame other people who buy tiffany jwellery and chanel bags.
Nevertheless noone knows what the cost of Leica's RD was to make this product and given their low sale volumes perhaps it is the only way for Leica to stay afloat ie charging extravagant amounts of money.
The images I see though are superb so there is something there after all and not just hype yet probably can be surpassed with a 5dsr and a 100 dollar 50mm1.8 !!...

0 upvotes
MikeF4Black

That body looks decidedly bloated with that elegant Summicron screwed on.

0 upvotes
howardfuhrman

While this Leica is not in my radar, this is one good looking camera.

0 upvotes
sentro

Too bad it's one of the most uncomfortable cameras I ever held in my hands. Took about 100 pics with it which were not bad but not better than other cameras I used costing a lot less. Decided to blow my $$$ on a Nikon d750 and a 300mm f2.8 with a 1.7x TC. the D750 is infinetlely more comfortable to hold and the pic quality is amazing. The way I look at Leica after this experience is the like looking at the emperor's new clothes. It's built well but it's more like a status camera......people who like to pay a lot of money for 'badge' and show off. Not having a problem with people spending their own money.....just a lot more hype than it's worth it.

1 upvote
mrtrik71

You are right about lieca they are nice but a total rip off they are camera pimps Cartier Bresson would be shocked at what they have become ,as a street photographer my advice is this ,buy one camera one lens and a flash and that's it and a tripod. You will become more creative and not a gear head which leads to losing your passion of photography ,get a x100sor something similar and just laugh at the 7000 dollars you saved and gorgeous photos your producing at a fraction of the cost or just buy a lieca film camera if you are so desperate to own a brand ,just a thought ,I have the experience and I'd like to advise new photographers don't become gear heads.

5 upvotes
Navmark77

Why would anyone spend hundreds of thousands of dollars on a Ferrari, when you can't fit your kids into it? Why would anyone spend hundreds of thousands of dollars on a Rolls Royce when you can't win a race with it?

I have no plans to buy a Leica on my budget, but I have no beef with those who want to buy the best thing of its kind in the world, and have the means to do so.

3 upvotes
PieterB

Why spend money on a 350 km/hr car while the speed limit is 120 km/h.
Some people just do. Maybe if I could easily afford it, I would buy one. The reality is, that I can't

0 upvotes
rfstudio

Are you guys serious ? just for black and white without anything over $7000 ?? sometimes we all lack of common sense and this is how we got ripped off..Leica has always been a rip off company ...at this day and age where technology is dirt cheap, everything that they sell is over $4000 and people still buy so a small piece of Sh** equipment where you can produce exactly the same thing using nikon or canon or sony pro line DSLR, but I guess most of us dont have common sense

5 upvotes
Duckie

What you said is true. But the surprise with which you say that is a bit surprising! I am glad that people all have different funny ways to spend their money. If everybody only spend their money only on basic food items, we'll all be in trouble!

4 upvotes
rfstudio

wow think about what u just said....lol

3 upvotes
The Davinator

Wow...I rarely see so much stupid compressed into one short post. You truly are clueless.

5 upvotes
red_dot

@ rfstudio: Yes we are serious. Very! Your message clearly show a lot of hate towards Leica. Nobody is forcing you to buy this camera or any other Leica product for that matter. Until you own a Leica product, please refrain from making such stupid comments.

3 upvotes
Ramses R

I have to disagree with you on that. I just sold all my Nikon equipment once I started shooting with Leica m9. IMHO the Leica m9 which used a CCD sensor is far more superior to a 36mp nikon d800. The result that I get from my m9 I could never get from my old D800.

3 upvotes
pedromeyer

No one is ripping off anyone, you have choices, don't you? So stop making dumb comments.

0 upvotes
mugwump64

please, please, pretty please: Can some of the other manufacturers please adapt some of this less-buttons, not P(ussy)-Modes approach to building a camera?

From what I understand, the interior is sub-par if you compare it to other full-frame compacts like sonys a7-line. What really makes me consider this is the list of no's which results in some significant less':

- no Programm or "Scene"-modes
- no video
- no wifi or other connectivity
- no EVF

-> less buttons, a well thought-out handling-scheme, longer battery-life

Once you're grown up, you know what you want from a camera: But if all you want to do is take well-exposed&composed pictures hassle-free, there is currently no camera that does this and only does this - unless you are willing to spend a fortune.

. But obviously, you can't sell a camera that only does one thing right - it always has to do everything mediocre.

7 upvotes
Peter in Milton

Close, but it does have video (although I can't imagine anyone getting this for B&W video production), and it does have an add-on EVF, which can be quite useful for critical focus or for unusual lenses – you could put a Nikon zoom on the camera if you wanted using an adaptor. All that said, its simplicity and directness of use is a large part of its charm.

1 upvote
jkantor

And it obviously costs a lot of money to take all those features out otherwise all the manufacturers would.

1 upvote
Jerry Canon

It is totally beyond my scope of understanding why anyone in their right mind would shell out $7,500 for this very limited camera, other than it's a Leica. Sure it's a Leica but why would you want this thing with its big ugly screw right in the center of its face?

2 upvotes
Peter in Milton

But not beyond mine :-) I think the camera looks wonderful, and the files I have seen from this machine are also wonderful. Anyone who likes B&W photography (and there are lots of us) and anyone who likes rangefinder cameras (lots of those too) will understand all too easily.

12 upvotes
Shomari

People who can afford or want this camera don't worry about the cost! You/we already know this though. If I could, I would....it's that simple.

3 upvotes
Canyongazer

Priorities.
You could buy three Monochrome bodies for the price of that 200HP outboard motor on your neighbor's bass boat.

0 upvotes
groe

Blah blah blah blah blah .... You dont even realize how cocky, useless you are.
Some of you are trying to justify their own choices, guess what, you dont have to. No one's forced to buy anything, therefor just do what you want, buy yourself a 10k $ camera if you want, a 350$ dp2 M if you want, a DSLR if you want or a casio. Just keep in mind that photography is hobby for some, an art for others, a passion, a tool... The only real good camera, is the one you take with you. Pay whatever price you want, just take pictures and have fun, pleasure. Dont come around and spread your sticky-jelly-pseudo-scientific-theories over me, save it for yourselves, you bunch of cavern trolls with bullet proof glasses on.
Oh and to that creepy guy who said post prod is cheating...man..watch for the sunlight, you might turn yourself into stone.

6 upvotes
alexisgreat

I'd like the ability to pick my own sensors, lenses, filters (or not) as I please and build my own cameras. Just like one can pick their own cpu, motherboard, video card, memory and peripherals and build their own computer.

1 upvote
HowaboutRAW

You mean pick the Intel or AMD CPU that you'll plug into a standardized receptacle.

Sensors don't really work like that. Cameras don't use one basic PCI design.

You can probably do want you want, but the resulting box will be kind of big for carrying around.

1 upvote
alexisgreat

Do you think it would be good idea if camera design and also RAW was standardized across the board?

1 upvote
HowaboutRAW

alex:

Even DNGs have changed over the years. Newish ones don't open with older software, software that has no problem with old DNGs.

You see a camera company is going to say: "we think we can get better results if we process the data a bit differently".

Then what about non-Bayer pattered RGB sensors?

Leica, Pentax and Ricoh all shoot DNGs.

1 upvote
alexisgreat

I guess my chief issue is having to buy a new version of Photoshop every time I buy a new camera so that it can read the new RAWs. But there are other options like Raw Digger, Lightroom and others.

I have a mono camera that I use for astrophotography, it doesn't even do RAW, it does something else called FITS and there's a free plugin available for it to use in Photoshop called FITS Liberator. I also use Fuji cameras which have EXR sensors (also not Bayer, enhanced dynamic range.)

0 upvotes
HowaboutRAW

alex:

PhotoShop is updated to new versions of Camera Raw. Albeit, Adobe has stopped updating CS5.

1 upvote
alexisgreat

I love my sensors bare, no filters allowed. That means no Bayer, no AA, no IR/UV cut filter. I add filters as I please, whether they be for narrowband imaging for light polluted areas or broadband color imaging or even UV or IR imaging.

I hate how manufacturers decide whats good for us and they add the filters "built-in" and cater to the lowly masses. I like building my own computers, telescopes, and cameras. It's how you LEARN. No wonder society is being dumbed down- no one likes to innovate anymore.

2 upvotes
rileyrg

You're not forced to buy these you know. Many people have better things to do with their time and money than go to the hassle and expense of doing all the basics themselves. There are surely other cameras more suited to your bare bones approach.

1 upvote
sensibill

I hate how manufacturers decide what we want to do with stuff. How dare Leica or Nikon or Sony decide 'you must use this to record images'... Maybe I want to fry some bacon? Maybe I need a rugged carabiner to repel down the side of a building? Psssh.

Soul-killing technocrat jerks, I say.

2 upvotes
alexisgreat

Having a scientific and flexible approach to photography is extremely useful. You can buy filters as you need them, I hate having to remove inbuilt stuff. I also build my own computers. In both cases it's a great way to learn how things work instead of brainlessly using them out of convenience. That's why I also loathe cell phone cameras- although they do serve a purpose of making sure authority figures dont abuse their power and they get documented with visual evidence if they do.

2 upvotes
sensibill

Yeah, a computer is just like a camera.

0 upvotes
GeorgeD200

...

Comment edited 22 seconds after posting
0 upvotes
xpatUSA

Well said!

I agree with the sentiment 100%

0 upvotes
alexisgreat

A camera IS a computer, just like a cell phone is a computer, people just dont like to admit they are technogeeks. All of the above have CPU, memory, chips, etc., they are ALL computers.

0 upvotes
alexisgreat

To those who doubt that mono sensors are better, obviously know little or nothing about physics. Of course they are better! Why else do astronomers (even us amateurs) use mono LRGB imaging. Bayer filter fake color imaging is only for those who are just beginning. Anyone who values image quality above all else images with LRGB, not only is the resolution much better, but exposure times are also much less! A Bayer filter can be removed from any sensor by simply scratching it off- there are a few tutorials online, look them up.

Anyone doubting the real advantages of mono imaging with color filters needs to look up LRGB imaging. You'll ditch Bayer forever.

4 upvotes
fad

My wife kindly offered to buy me a Leica for Xmas, and I turned her down. I feel the romance of the Leica, but I don't see its practical benefits for street photography over my various FX Nikons. For fine MF glass, I have an Otus 55mm.

Except for smaller size, and better MF after about a year of adjustment, what does any of the newer Leicas offer me as a photographic instrument that is superior to the better sensors, DR, low light, AF, color in the D810, D750, D4s (and perhaps soon a D5) in the best Nikons?

I don't care about hand feel and so forth. My cameras are invisible to me.

3 upvotes
HowaboutRAW

Manual focus with a Leica M would be faster than with the Otus 55mm on a Nikon FX body.

The Leica body is smaller, so are the lenses for the most part. But right Nikon has somewhat better sensors.

Your wife should know to budget 3 times the Leica M body price for good Leica M lenses. That means if you're shooting the Otus 55, then of course you'd get the 50mm f/2.0 APO for an M, or/and the Noctilux.

Yes, I realize you said "no, but thank you", to your wife.

3 upvotes
sensibill

Not a big Leica guy myself, but try checking out even casual snapshots with the Leica M M and you might see character and range not easily reproduced with FX Nikons. I don't even think my IBIS-equipped A7II can achieve that kind of evocative street photography, frankly.

6 upvotes
boxingshow

How much will you pay for a tripod ?

0 upvotes
JakeB

Buy a black Fujifilm X100t.

Set the jpegs to black and white.

Done. NO ONE will be able to tell the difference.

Decide what you'll do with the other $9,000 you've just saved.

27 upvotes
koruki

prize for most original suggestion.

If you're gonna use a crop sensor why not just pull out your iPhone and shoot in mono mode since you're not going to look at the photo in detail. Then you can decide what you'll do with the money you saved on the Fuji

4 upvotes
The Silver Nemesis

IMHO: buy a roll of Fujifilm Neopan Acros. And a used Leica M6. Buy Leica lenses with the rest. Everyone will notice the difference.

6 upvotes
kodachromeguy

As expected, Dpreview's standard gang of black and white haters are out in force voting up this comment.

4 upvotes
sensibill

I agree the X100T will produce nice tones in B&W and cost a tiny fraction of the Leica, but there's no denying the fact that the M is a dedicated mono sensor and its results will indeed have a pop lacking in the Fuji.

2 upvotes
Mark Alan Thomas

It’s doubtful that a Fuji fan would be able to tell the difference, but photographers with a discerning eye and an appreciation for quality can, and they’re willing to pay for it.

2 upvotes
EduardoKleinFichtner

http://www.ultrasomething.com/photography/2015/04/sensors-and-sensibility/

1 upvote
Timmbits

Does anyone know if it is possible to mod existing cameras, to B&W, by removing the color filter?
Not having an RGB filter results in massive sensitivity gains... not to mention that every photosite is acting to sense the presence of ALL light - meaning you have effectively tripling resolution/sharpness - or quadrupling it if you take into account that there are two green for each blue and red pair.
You'd most likely have to use good UV filters again as back in the film days.

Comment edited 2 times, last edit 7 minutes after posting
0 upvotes
nwcs

You can but you won't get the same kind of result as a sensor purposely built for monochrome. HyperCams' Brent Oliver will do it on a number of cameras. The Sigma Foveon sensors would probably be the closest to having the best of both worlds, albeit with their own quirks.

0 upvotes
xpatUSA

1) Buy a Sigma SD1M. 2) Remove the "dust cover" UV/IR filter from the lens mount (not even a screwdriver needed). 3) in Sigma Photo Pro, convert to monochrome.

Job done ;-)

0 upvotes