sensibill

One of the most useless videos on the subject of photography - what's good for him (like a Fuji paycheck for instance) isn't necessarily going to work for someone else, nor should it. FF isn't a ...

But you also went on about how '30% of all DPR' touts 'FF superiority'. It's sounding like a bit of an axe to grind, honestly...

Tonality and micro contrast are also substantially better with FF, as well as latitude for adjustment in post, which DPR is only recently testing for. DR at base ISO isn't quite the same as how far ...

No difference from my A7 to the A7II. You can use semi-clear tape to cut down on the range, though.

Funny, I found it the opposite and that was with the A7 vs. the A6000. Obviously there's a bit more IQ to be had with the R and RII models, but the basic 24MP packs a substantial advantage over ...

I liked my RX1 well enough, though I needed the cash and couldn't afford to have two $1800-ish camera bodies so I stuck with the A7 at the time. $3300 seems pretty stiff, given the A7RII is ...

Sharpness and CA are optical aspects, 'contrast' is more likely to be environmental or due to PP, filters, lack of hood and basically flare. Iliah posted an excellent writeup on flare incidence ...

Why is instant button access to APS-C mode a 'professional' feature? Whenever someone wants to place emphasis on their criticism now, it's something lacking that keeps the camera from being ...

Right - the horror of not knowing the basics of what you're reviewing. Professional shills, for sure.

It looks like you can avoid cRAW artifacts by bumping ISO, though you're losing DR and might clip highlights more than lower.

'Useless' and 'Worthless' - the most abused words on the internet, especially in the camera world. The 28-70 is OK as others are noting as long as you don't mind edges not being screaming sharp. ...

He's called the A7 series toys, that Sony cannot make a serious camera. His unending rabid tirade is tiresome, as are all his unending rabid tirades. Yes, he does say Sony users are fanboys. He's ...

And you haven't demonstrated these images that can't be used. That's MY point. It has zero to do with how many images you've shot or your 'credentials'. I have photos for sale online myself and ...

We can disagree. It's clearly heavily edited, either way and does not prove incidence of thumbnail-visible 50% (or so) sized visible artifacts without extensive PP. That's about my experience with ...

You've got a point, but the extent to which he keeps getting 'press time' wears on some of us more than others, apparently. I see him as a 'modern day' Ken Rockwell writ more angry and ridiculous, ...

Yeah, it definitely packs more punch per volume, that's for sure. And as already said, it's superbly put together, fine tuned for that lens, etc.

He goes off on 'Sony fanboys' all the time. Anyone finding fault with his process (so to speak) is derided. Obviously you haven't read some of his more colorful and incoherent tirades.

Where it applies to hack haters like Lloyd, I'd say the aggression is all him. His tirades and custom-plucked reader messages and his circle-jerk responses are about as relevant and constructive ...

:-D Eloquently said! Does anyone take this crank seriously, anymore? Maybe he can post another cRAW artifact rant to up subscriptions again.

3 points is nothing. Within their margin of error. The RX1 has near identical performance because it's the same sensor. I've shot a lot with both, too. Other than optical performance IQ-wise ...