The New Math: Multi-agency enforcement actions against Commerzbank AG

Everyone gets a piece of the pie here – the NY Department of Financial Services gets $610 million, OFAC’s official fine is in excess of $250 million (but is deemed paid on the basis of the lesser amount paid to the Department of Justice). All told, it’s another mega-fine of $1.45 billion dollars for conduct breaching the Iran, Weapons of Mass Destruction, Sudan, Burma and Cuba sanctions programs from 2002 until 2010.

Here is how OFAC saw matters in knocking down the penalty from a base of over $574 million:

The following were found to be aggravating factors:

  • At a minimum,Commerzbank acted with reckless disregard for U.S. sanctions requirements in processingtransactions in apparent violation of OFAC sanctions regulations;
  • management at Commerzbankknew or had reason to know of the conduct leading to certain of the apparent violations;
  • theconduct described above conferred significant economic benefit to persons subject to U.S.sanctions and undermined the integrity of multiple U.S. sanctions programs;
  • Commerzbank is alarge, commercially sophisticated financial institution; and
  • Commerzbank did not maintainadequate policies or procedures to ensure compliance with the sanctions programs administeredby OFAC.

Mitigation was extended because

  • Commerzbank has not received a penalty notice orFinding of Violation from OFAC in the five years preceding the date of the earliest transactiongiving rise to the apparent violations;
  • Commerzbank cooperated with OFAC’s investigation ofthe apparent violations by engaging in an extensive internal investigation, by responding forrequests for information, and by executing a statute of limitations tolling agreement withmultiple extensions; and
  • Commerzbank took remedial action in response to the apparentviolations described above.

The NY DFS was also able to extract, in return for settling the charges, the termination of multiple employees and the installation of an independent monitor at Commerzbank.

Links:

OFAC Notice

OFAC Enforcement Action

Treasury Department Settlement

Treasury Department Press Release

NY DFS Press Release

 

BTMU fined – again – by NY DFS

This fine of $315 million is on top of the $250 million previously agreed to, and is a result of BTMU (Bank Tokyo-Mitsubishi UFJ Group) pressuring Price Waterhouse Coopers (PwC) to remove elements from its prior attestation to NY State that would have cast a dimmer view on its behavior.

In addition, the NY Department of Financial Services (DFS) insisted that one employee be fired and that he, and two others working elsewhere in BTMU, be barred from further involvement in the affairs of the NY branch. The hiring of an indepdendent consultant to conduct a program review through March 2015 (with a possible extension of up to September 2016) was also mandated, as was the relocation of the compliance functions to NY.

As the NY DFS doesn't provide any automated way to get its releases, I'm indebted to the FCPA Blog's story on this matter – link below.

Additionally, I've included links to the settlement and BTMU's statement in response to the settlement.

Word to the wise – like the credo for doctors: first do no harm. How much cheaper would it have been for BTMU to fess up in the first place? Much.

Links:

FCPA Blog story

Settlement between NY DFS and BTMU

BTMU Statement