www.fgks.org   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

PIX 2015
Previous page Next page

Nikon D7200 Review

Review based on production Nikon D7200

One of our favorite DSLRs in the past few years is the Nikon D7100, which was introduced way back in February 2013. The D7200 isn't a radical upgrade by any means, yet it still adds some important features, most notably a larger buffer, improved autofocus performance in low light, 60p video, Wi-Fi with NFC, and 15% better battery life.

The D7200 is Nikon's high-end APS-C camera, and is the only DX format camera in the company's current lineup to support autofocus on screw drive lenses. It finds itself in the same class as the Canon EOS 7D Mark II, Pentax K-3, and Sony SLT-A77 II DSLRs as well as the Fujifilm X-T1, Olympus OM-D E-M5 II, Samsung NX1, and Sony Alpha 7 II mirrorless cameras. In other words, it's a very crowded field.

Nikon D7200 key features

  • 24.2MP CMOS sensor with no optical low-pass filter
  • Multi-CAM 3500DX II 51-point AF system, all sensitive to -3EV
  • 2,016-pixel RGB metering sensor, used for 3D subject tracking in AF-C
  • ISO 100-25,600, with ISO 51,200 and 102,400 black and white modes
  • 6 fps continuous shooting (7 fps in 1.3x crop mode) with increased buffer depth
  • 1/8000 sec maximum shutter speed
  • 3.2", 1.2M dot RGBW LCD display
  • 1080/60p video (1.3x crop only) with clean output over HDMI and Flat Picture Control
  • Dual SD card slots
  • Wi-Fi with NFC
  • Magnesium alloy weather-sealed body

One of the most important features on the D7200 is its improved AF system. Nikon has updated the D7200 to its Multi-CAM 3500DX II system, which still offers 51 AF points (the central 15 of which are cross-type), but now all of those points are sensitive to -3EV, while the D7100's were limited to -2EV.

The most obvious improvement in the D7200 compared to the D7100 will be noticed by anyone who shoots continuously. The buffer size on the D7100 was tiny and filled up almost instantly, which not only affected burst shooting but bracketing as well. You can now fire away with the D7200 for up to 18 14-bit lossless compressed, 27 12-bit compressed Raws, or 100+ JPEGs. The maximum burst rate remains the same: 6 fps at full size and 7 fps in 1.3x crop mode.

The D7200 can now extend its ISO higher than on its predecessor, but with a catch. Seeing how little color detail would be left at ISO 51,200 and 102,400, Nikon has chosen to make those two sensitivities black and white only.

Two other new features of note are 60p video (with Flat Picture Control, also available for stills) and Wi-Fi. While the addition of 60p video is nice, it's only available in 1.3x crop mode. The D7200 also has Wi-Fi with NFC, which Nikon has branded 'SnapBridge', which allows for remote camera control and image transfer.

Compared to D7100

 
Nikon D7100
Nikon D7200
Pixel count 24.1MP 24.2MP
Processor Expeed 3 Expeed 4
Optical low-pass filter No
ISO range (expanded) 100-51,200 100-102,400
(51,200 and 102,000 black & white)
AF system Multi-CAM 3500DX Multi-CAM 3500DX II
AF sensitivity -2EV -3EV
Maximum frame rate 6 fps (7 fps in 1.3x crop mode, 5fps with 14-bit Raw)
Buffer depth * 6 Raw, 50 JPEG 18 Raw, 100 JPEG
Maximum video quality 1080/60i (1.3x crop mode) 1080/60p (1.3x crop mode)
Flat picture control No Yes
LCD display 3.2" 1.2M dot RGBW
Wi-Fi No Yes, with NFC
Dual memory card slots Yes (SD/SDHC/SDXC)
Battery used EN-EL15
Battery life 950 shots 1110 shots
* Raw files are 14-bit lossless compressed, the default setting

It's interesting to note that the sensor has a slightly difference pixel count to its predecessor, which suggests a new sensor. This can only be good news since, although it performed well by many measures, the Toshiba sensor in the D7100 would exhibit pronounced banding once you hit its noise floor. We've seen Nikon's continued use of Sony sensors in many of its other models, including the APS-C D5500; however, a close inspection of the D7200's sensor, and furthermore lab results, both suggest it's not using the same sensor as the D5500. We'd venture to guess an updated version of the Toshiba sensor used in the D7100 makes an appearance in the D7200 and, with it, comes an improvement in dynamic range due to a complete lack of banding in shadows of base ISO files.

The basic AF layout is the same on the D7200 as it was on the D7100. There are 51 points, with the center 15 being cross-type. On the D7100 though, AF points were sensitive down to -2EV. On the D7200, they're all sensitive down to -3EV, which will be a boon for low light shooting.

As mentioned above, the D7200's new autofocus system is a big deal. You can focus in conditions a full stop dimmer, and our tests with the updated Multi-CAM 3500 II sensor in the D750 showed that it continued to focus in significantly darker conditions than the Multi-CAM 3500 sensor in the D810 (a DX variant of which was used in the D7100). What this means is that the camera will focus a whole lot better in low light conditions, across the entire frame. In other words, its non-central AF points will likely focus in dimmer conditions than any other DSLR out there, save for Nikon's own D750.

Cross-type points remain limited to the central 15 though, and the RGB metering sensor used for TTL metering is unchanged at a resolution of 2,016 pixels. It's a shame that this number isn't higher. The recently released Canon 7D Mark II itself offers a 150,000-pixel RGB+IR metering sensor which, like Nikon's cameras with 91k-pixel sensors, has enough resolution to even detect faces and focus on them during OVF shooting. But Nikon's algorithms for 3D tracking just seem to be better (Canon's iTR in the 7D Mark II is imprecise and laggy in comparison, despite its higher resolution metering sensor), so we're fans of Nikon's subject tracking algorithms in combination with their higher resolution metering sensors.

If you want to control your camera without laying a hand on it, then you'll appreciate the D7200's built-in Wi-Fi. Naturally, photos can be transferred and shared, which is extra-easy if you have a NFC-compatible smartphone.

Lastly, there's battery life. Perhaps its due to the more efficient Expeed 4 processor, but whatever Nikon has done, it's managed to squeeze another 160 shots per charge out of the D7200 compared to the D7100.

Pricing and Availability

The D7200 is available with and without a lens, in the USA. For the body only it will be priced at $1199.95, and if you throw in the 18-140mm f/3.5-5.6 ED VR lens the price rises to $1699.95. 

Review Timeline:

• March 2nd, 2015: Original First Impressions Review published
• April 1st, 2015: Samples gallery added
• April 30th, 2015: Operation & Controls, Menus, Studio Test Scene and Raw Dynamic Range pages added.
• June 2nd, 2015: Shooting Experience, Video & Wi-Fi, Autofocus and Conclusion pages added.

If you're new to digital photography you may wish to read the Digital Photography Glossary before diving into this article (it may help you understand some of the terms used).

Conclusion / Recommendation / Ratings are based on the opinion of the reviewer, you should read the ENTIRE review before coming to your own conclusions.

We recommend to make the most of this review you should be able to see the difference (at least) between X, Y, and Z and ideally A, B, and C.

This article is Copyright 1998 - 2015 and may NOT in part or in whole be reproduced in any electronic or printed medium without prior permission from the author.

Previous page Next page
214
I own it
148
I want it
22
I had it
Discuss in the forums

Comments

Total comments: 575
123
aussiejohns49

I've been using one, along with D750, since May. Interestingly I find the exposure much more consistent on the D7200 than the D750, and I like the lightness. I use a Tamron 10-24 and 16-300 for travel and really don't miss the weight! Image results are very satisfactory. My D7200 replaced a D5100, the size of which and quality was always a bit of a positive shock. I find the video unconvincing. AF is not user friendly or visually acceptable. If used manually, with care, results are excellent. But should we have to resort to manual to get the most from it? As a still camera there's little more I could wish for. Even WiFi is pretty slick. But to start, I did need tech support to get my head around it. Overall the Silver rating is fair, if you weight Video as heavily as the reviews of today's cameras do. As a still camera alone I would give it a Gold, despite the modest upgrade. The base camera was already darned good by all accounts. Sure beats my older D200!

0 upvotes
Sorin Vacaru

I am using your own camera comparison tool to compare the D7200 against the cameras you state are equal or better (NX-1, a6000, 7DMII). Almost without exception, they are ONLY better in the video category.

Frankly, I personally do not give a .... ..... about video. The only thing that I could wish for in addition to the current features is the 91K sensor and maybe the higher ruggedness of the 7DMII. Otherwise, the D7200 is the perfect crop sensor camera for stills.

2 upvotes
Matt1645f4

At last someone who thinks the sae about Video as me, Ican't understand why they cant give a percentage result for stills and video and then an over all score. Doesn't give a fair and impartial review of each feature.

1 upvote
here 2 infinity

I have been considering going back to Nikon because of this camera. I have been using the Canon 7D primarily for Real Estate Photography since retiring from the Motion picture business some 5 years ago. I want to give it a go because of the 3.5 more stops of exposure latitude, as Canon seems to have dropped the ball in this area, and no sign of any intention of changing that. My problem with the D7200 is the lack of a PC sync terminal. I must have an on camera flash on the camera for fill in addition to using my Cybersync transmitter (velcro-d to the flash and plugged into the PC sync on the camera) to fire 6 to as many as 15 studio strobes sprinkled around a house. I have looked at hot shoe mounted PC terminal adapters, but not one has the build quality and lock-on capabilities required for every day professional use. Anyone out there have any ideas?

0 upvotes
the beard

I'm a simple soul really and the D7000 was my first foray into the DSLR field, having come from a FE and F3 via a Lumix bridge camera. One of the big things for me was the ability to use all my old AI lenses and still have the benefit of metering. As my Nikon film cameras lasted me over 30 years (and still function today) I can't see myself upgrading for quite a long time, but it's good to see how quickly things move on nowadays. Now, where's my magnesium flash?

0 upvotes
Paul Petersen

I think the the silver award is understandable but not fully deserved. I think it is more based on the perceived missing features not the quality and refinement of the operation of the camera.
I have shot mine for two months and it is a paradigm shift from my D90 in so many ways. Yes incremental revisions are getting pretty small compared to the heyday of 5 years ago. The Canon 7DII is a very good allegory to the 7200 and its iteration was over 5 years not 2 for the D7200.

0 upvotes
Marc Cann

Why oh why did Nikon cripple the top LCD display? Even the Nikon D70s I owned back in 2005 was able to display more information than D7200, namely white balance, auto focus mode and image size. I really got used to using the top LCD panel but I suppose I will have to switch to using the back screen instead.

1 upvote
Paul Petersen

It really is no loss since the icons were so small and its so much nicer doing it on the big color LCD. I don't miss it on mine.

1 upvote
stevef1961

I love that word cripple... Honda crippled my Accord because it doesn't have heated seats.

0 upvotes
steve norris

I use Nikon professionally and have recently upgraded my D7000 to the D7200 just to keep up to date, skipping the D7100. I use a D810 for studio work but now go to the D7200 for wildlife shooting as it has a similar pixel density and gives the desirable extra 'reach'.

All opinions in these forums are subjective but, for me, the upgrade was well worth it and the camera, using good Nikon lenses, gives me the stunning image quality I've come to expect.

There are some fantastically capable cameras out there today and all have their merits but I am pleased to have added the D7200 to the list of Nikons I've owned, used and made money from since my first used Nikon 'F' in 1968.

Comment edited 48 seconds after posting
10 upvotes
Wubslin

Still doesn't explain why I should buy one though.

0 upvotes
SteveFranklin

It's not trying to convince you buy one. It's giving you objective, empirical information for YOU to decide on whether you should buy one.

8 upvotes
Wubslin

If you honestly believe that then I have a bridge to sell you.

All you need to get the ball rolling is a $1,000 bridge sale initiation/administration fee.

Western Union only please.

0 upvotes
DesmondD

It's not an advert - as Steve Franklin mentions it's a review.

1 upvote
vesa1tahti

Simply explained: if you want the best IQ from an APS-camera, buy this. E.g. Sigma 18-35/1,8 A + D7200 = outstanding image quality!

3 upvotes
muljao

Liking camera so far. Only have it a week so my opinion now may have rose coloured glasses. Few things I'd like, to be able to completely turn off screen for all actions. I'd like iso adjustment in full stops also. I'm sure I'll find more to whinge about

0 upvotes
artlmntl

Excellent review! I have to admit, the iso-invariant quality at iso 100 is impressive! Even cranked up to +6 stops, the results look outstanding. There is a bit of color shift, but noise seems manageable and detail seems surprisingly good. With some good 2.8 zooms or bright primes, this should be great!

0 upvotes
vesa1tahti

Agreed! Sigma 18-35/1,8 A + D7200 = outstanding image quality !

1 upvote
cwm10k

I'm torn, do you go with the Nikon D610 or the Nikon D7200?

0 upvotes
mby852

I think for the money difference I'd go FF.

0 upvotes
Entropius

Depends. Do you want to shoot DX or FX? I'm a wildlife person so I'd rather have DX. If you do indoor photography you probably want FX.

0 upvotes
stevef1961

I've had DX and now FX. For me, the ability to shoot clean ISO's at 1600 and 3200 allows me to get shutter speeds up in the 1/1000+ area. Something I wasn't able to do on my DX and gives me much more keepers than anything taken at slower speeds. Would I like the extra reach... sure, but I'll take the low noise and try to get closer to the wildlife.

0 upvotes
Faisalee

Hi DPreview,

I have been a long time follower of this wonderful site, since the time of Nikon D1 days! the reviews have always been great source of info BUT!

The following has NEVER happened before, at least I have never seen it here before!

Pros: Reasonably small, light body for a DSLR at this level
Cons: Camera is bulky when compared to mirrorless rival

Why is a DSLR being compared to a Mirrorless? "Single Lens Reflex" is not Mirrorless guys, please!

First its reasonably small, light bidy for a "DSLR" at this "level" and then you guys go out of the way and totally change the "level" and compare it against a mirrorless?

One of these have to go, either the Pros or the Cons :)

8 upvotes
brownie314

I don't really have a problem with it. It is small when compared to similar DSLR products. And at the same time, it is large compared to something like the Olympus OMD E-M1, which is a valid comparison as the E-M1 is specified highly just like the D7200.

1 upvote
Entropius

"Why is a DSLR being compared to a Mirrorless? "Single Lens Reflex" is not Mirrorless guys, please!"

Because they do the same sort of thing. The review is fine: "It's small compared to other DSLR's, but large compared to mirrorless cameras which do much the same thing."

1 upvote
Banj72

Hi guys!
anybody knows how to set the black and white mode feature of this camera? I just don't know how, and I saw a review that you can, but didn't show how.. I appreciate a quick tutorial..😊

Thanks!

0 upvotes
blaster182

Try accessing 'picture control' in the menu and select the monochrome mode.

0 upvotes
boxingshow

Great camera! Always love to use with it! The only question is, I wanna purchase a tripod for my travelling, don't know which one to buy? Need some advice.
http://www.amazon.com/ZOMEi-Z668-Tripod-Ball-Camera/dp/B00PRK8G1I/ref=sr_1_1?s=electronics&ie=UTF8&qid=1436429555&sr=1-1&keywords=zomei+tripod

0 upvotes
bolt2014

Please Nikon, fully articulated LCD screens on all your DSLR's! There are so many uses for them.

Comment edited 1 minute after posting
2 upvotes
Meemz

does anyone else use the viewfinder to take pics. Mine doesn't adjust clear and sharp like the D7000 did. But the pictures are perfect. Just blurred in eve piece/ viewfinder? Is that normal?

0 upvotes
EnfieldLady

Check this out, it might work for you.
http://www.dpreview.com/forums/thread/2977523#forum-post-38067637

0 upvotes
User3608942453

Ehm - this review is something like a car review. Author likes VW Golf and so, every feature different is bug. This is DSLR, review DSLR, compare it to other DSLRs. Not to mirrorless, not to VW Golf. Thanks.

10 upvotes
el big conde

- es por demas de llamativo que pese a varios meses de salir la nikon d 7200 casi no se encuentran comparativas de fotos entre modelos de tomas con la dx 7100 y dx 7200 ¿¿?? y lo poco que se mostro que nikon aca en la 7200 tiene menos ruido a isos mas altos pero paga un precio por suavisar TODA LA TOMA arriba de 3200 iso...conclucion menos ruido pero TAMBIEN MENOS DETALLES DONDE JUSTO LO NECESITAMOS...nadie noto esa falencia.? saludos

1 upvote
Sucama

tengo una d7100 y he probado durante unas semanas la d7200.
Efectivamente hay mas detalles en la d7100 sin dudas, tambien mejor exposicion y color. Hoy no tengo dudas la mejor DX del momento es la d7100 , No compraria la d7200 , a pesar del buffer.
Saludos Mario

1 upvote
wombat661

Pretty disingenuous to compare D7200 size with OM-D E-M5 that is a micro 4/3 sensor in your "Shooting Experience" page. You should know better than that. Fujifilm X-E2 is a better comparison for size.
Still, look at the actual numbers, D7200 is only about 1.5" thicker and taller than the X-E2. Then in your "Body and Design" page, you complain that D7200 is not thick enough for a comfortable hold. What do you think would happen if you were to use the even thinner X-E2 camera. That would be torture on your fingers would it not?
Regardless, 1.5" is not going to break your arm or break your camera bag. Remember, lens size is about the same.

3 upvotes
JakeB

Work with both systems, as I have, and you'll immediately appreciate the difference in size and weight.

0 upvotes
wombat661

I have a Nikon 1, so I do know they can be pretty small. But the two systems are not to be compared. They are like Prius vs F150. Both gets you there, but totally different purpose.

0 upvotes
Marc Trotter

So, using the same lenses, how much better would out-of-camera jpegs be with D7200 versus my D5100? I am a jpeg shooter and never been bowled over by the jpeg quality I've been able to get out of the D5100.

1 upvote
axelian

Images will be a bit more "crisp" due to the sensor (24 Mp vs 16 Mp), all things untouched elsewhere, with same lenses. Try in a store an inexpensive 35 mm DX lens to see what "sharp" may be on jpgs :-)

But ergonomics, AF, speed, rear LCD (size and detail), commands... will change your vision of what's an DSLR.

I sometimes use D5xxx cameras, feel like "nice gadgets" that doesn't fit my hand (large ones for true ;-))
bye

1 upvote
MarshallG

My thinking is that if your photography techniques haven't yet developed to where you see a benefit to the added controls and features of the 7200, then upgrading won't benefit you very much. And that's ok; for most of us, photography is a hobby and leisure activity, not a competitive sport.

I shoot with Canon, and I learned how to use Canon's free RAW image editor. It's very simple; you can't make a mistake editing RAW images because no matter how many ways you edit the image and save it, you can always revert back to its original appearance without losing any quality.

Your equipment is capable of sharp, rich, professional-quality photographs. Before upgrading, post some of your photos in the forums here for comments. You will get some great advice.

4 upvotes
mmurph

If you aren't shooting wildlife or sports, a Nikon D5300 would probably be a better fit for you than the D7200. A used D5300 with the 18-55 VR II kit lens is running $430 to $450. Or buy a refurb for a little over $500.

Before you upgrade though. shoot some images in RAW+JPEG on the D5100. I shoot RAW+JPEG for everything.

Use a good lens, preferably a prime like the 35 1.8 or 50 1.8 ($125 used.) Use a high shutter speed, or hold your camera on a fence, etc.

Or download some sample RAW images here - from D5100 + D5300.

Download a trial copy of Adobe Lightroom 6.0. (Not Adobe Lightroom CC. Or buy an older copy of Lightroom 5 for $30.)

Import the RAW files, and play with the "Develop" settings.

You can use the "Auto Tone" function to get pleasing results. You can change the White Balance of the RAW file in the software. You can play with Sharpening settings, and you can also change the Profiles at the bottom the same as you can in camera (Vivid, Landscape, Portrait, etc.)

1 upvote
NCoding

I own D5100 for 2 years and bought D7200 recently. Now I use them both (D7200 much more)
I will compare that way:
Having D5100 is like having a big old revolver, but having D7200 is like have an uzi or AK-47 (Kalashnikov).

Why I decide to upgrade? Mostly because of the focusing system. D5100 owns 11 point AF system and if you want to focus somewhere else not at a certain focus point you have to move the camera which drives me crazy. D7200 focuses faster and with 51 AF points there is not "moving problem" for me. I shoot mainly JPEG and I my opinion the pics a "more rich" (24MP matrix vs 16MP).
After I user D7200 for a while so far I think the pics are darker (vs D5100 in the same conditions), with an idea more sharp and with better DOF.
This is my opinion so far

0 upvotes
AIR1967

Hi all,
So far, from all discussions read and many reviews/comparatives, I've seen many people upgrading from D90/D7000 to D7200 (or NX1, 7DII, SONY, etc.) and being satisfied with the change.
However, I've seen no posting regarding going from D300s to D7200, though the latter ""might be considered"" to have same or better specifications. Am I missing a chapter? Or D300s owners prefer either wait a little bit more or jump into FX?
Thanks.

0 upvotes
flipcody

I don't know if this is still pertinent to you being 2 months after you posted but I upgraded from D300s to D7200. It has been a great upgrade for me. The better focus in low light, much better high ISO performance, and added resolution would be enough reason for me to upgrade alone. All 3 of those are huge for me. There are other features the D7200 that are also nice to have and are just icing on the cake. 1080p video with good focus control is also very nice. This is a great upgrade from a D300s. I considered going to the D750 (and had the money) but I'm a huge fan of DX and there were just not enough compelling reasons to spend the extra $800.

1 upvote
DukeCC

The D400 holdouts are starting to trickle in. If the D7300 is released before the fabled D400, then all but the very cantankerous-est will 'cross-grade', I imagine.
Just don't try and accuse them of 'up'-grading to a lowly prosumer body!!

0 upvotes
EcoPix

The sad thing is that the D300 and D7000 style bodies are just different enough in operation to be difficult to use together. I find it gets confusing. So what do you do? Hold out with D300 style until (maybe) a D400, go full frame, or go to the D7000 style entirely?
I'm in the twilight zone using both D300s and D7100, and I think I have to ditch the D300 bodies even though they're still fine cameras, to standardise on the newer design.
It will be the end of a ten year working relationship with the D200/300/300s body style, and while the 71's and 72's are undoubtedly fine cameras, it will still be a sad day for me.

0 upvotes
EcoPix

Thanks dpReview for raising the issue of focus accuracy with SLR lenses. We love our reflex viewfinders, but increasing resolution is starting to reach the limits of this design. Zoom lenses often need different focus calibrations for different distances and focal lengths (and even f-stops sometimes), making the adjustments complex and too much for even the capable operator to do by AF fine tuning.

What’s needed now is focus mapping for each lens. Given the power of the modern camera’s IC, would it be possible for manufacturers to include a program in the firmware that maps focus for each lens at the range of distances, f-stops and focal lengths via the main sensor, and stores the data for calibration of the AF module?

0 upvotes
EcoPix

So in practice, a new owner of a lens would fit it to the camera, go into live view, and initiate a one-off software routine that mapped focus at representative distances and f-stops while the owner zoomed the lens (for manual zooms). This focus map could be stored in the way that the simple AF fine tune settings are presently stored, and applied automatically whenever that lens was fitted.

3 upvotes
fz750

Seems very simple, in principle, and definitely sounds useful, but I imagine it's not easy due to lack of reference points. I think you'd need the owner to perfectly manually focus though the viewfinder, and then switch to liveview to compare and calculate the difference..(and store etc.)

Comment edited 23 seconds after posting
0 upvotes
Charlie boots

Great idea, nikon could provide a focusing target with full instructions in the box to use. Better yet nikon should launch a body to match the Sony 7r2 which can take all nikon lenses. I would be their first customer.

0 upvotes
Canon2Nikon

I thought that's what lens data firmware updates are for ... Maybe I'm missing something here... Please feel free to educate me. :)

0 upvotes
DukeCC

Those are just for distortion control, no?

0 upvotes
Deliverator

@fz750: I'm thinking it would work exactly opposite. Perfectly focus in Liveview, then switch to the viewfinder, and note the change to focus. Repeat several times for each focal length and each aperture. Could be automated with a USB link and a program on a PC.

0 upvotes
wh34erocoler

Great review that D7200 is a beast

1 upvote
JimHohn

How about 42nd St. Photo ? Anyone care to comment on reliability ?

1 upvote
JimHohn

Anyone familiar with or willing to comment on fumfie.com ?

0 upvotes
srinu kumar

Really a nice camera again from Nikon nice features

0 upvotes
Georgios Liakopoulos

Apart from the big discussion concerning the photographic features, adding a GPS receiver could be a plus to the value of this upgrade. It is incomprehensible to me how they descide not to include such a cheap and very useful feature such as the GPS receiver in these machines. Even the cheapest mobile phone is GPS capable these days..

1 upvote
nikil

I wonder if the differences in brightness and processing are due to Nikon wanting the D7200

0 upvotes
sachin99

We prefer using a VF to not be distracted by the surroundings. We can't imagine shooting from the real lcd only

1 upvote
matander

Whos "We"..
If i´m included in "We" then you are way off... I use both the VF and the LCD according to what fits the situation best. I´m a NX1 user and i get the same AF performance (wich is brilliant) wether im using the VF or the LCD for framing the image. I do not have to lay down on the ground to take an action shot from low level, wich is quite effectful.
To get that kind of shots from D7200 i agree that the surroundings could distract you... especially if the ground is wet..

/Mats

3 upvotes
LastPage

My first and only digital camera was my now defunct Panasonic DMC FZ10. I used the live view exclusively and trusted the cameras auto focus for at least getting me in the focus neighborhood. Sometimes I had to make corrections of course. But live view allowed me to view my subject matter as a picture - as a whole composed picture.

I can see the value in learning to use a good view finder too to see the detail of specific action shots but either that camera didn't have a great viewfinder or I just got used to live view. Regardless, live view made for some great composed shots.

0 upvotes
prossi

Long live live view!

In order for any apsc camera to get gold going forward it will need to have the video of nx1, DR of d7200, buffer of 7DII, size of a6000, connectivity of an iphone and live view. Pretty much?

4 upvotes
Umutsezerkoc

Which one should I buy for all-around type of photography? I shoot everything! Street, landscape, sports.. etc.
Sony a6000
Nikon D7200
Canon 70D
I shoot videos lot too, but, touch screen doesn't matter so much, I just want the best quality and speed. Or should I wait for a new camera maybe 80d or a7000/a6100? If you want, you can recommend me another camera under $1500.

1 upvote
prossi

Nice troll!

0 upvotes
Dougbm_2

As you shoot videos a lot the 70D is the one or you. Also for sports too. Pair it with a 15-85 and 70-200L IS and you are good to go. Exactly what I recommended to a friend. He is very happy!
Start with the 18-135 stm if you can't afford those. Better for video too.

0 upvotes
We PhotoBooth You

Not the best looking but some awesome specs!

0 upvotes
Tom Frerichs

I buy a camera body after considering how I'll use it. I want a fairly large buffer, a reasonable burst frame rate, reasonable low light capability, decent image quality, and a good AF system. The D7200, which replaces my older but still serviceable D7000, met those needs.

I should explain that I have a fairly substantial investment in Nikon glass, so I wasn't interested in switching brands. I should also add that I photograph sports, primarily rodeo, and some "urban landscape" stuff.

The lower rating given here doesn't affect my decision at all. Sorry, but I'll take phase detect AF over contrast detect AF any time. And, contrary to the authors' assertions, I have more success with 9 point AF over the 3D version, possibly because there often is little color differentiation between my subjects and the backgrounds.

I don't care about video, 4K or otherwise. There were other "features" that were considered sub-par that I don't give a damn about. The D7200 does what I need it to do.

9 upvotes
marike6

Don't worry Tom, DPR also gave the D7000, a class leading, even ground breaking APS-C camera at the time, an essentially average award.

It seems DPR has been shifting their focus away from the enthusiast and pro DSLR shooters shooters like you (users who make up the majority of their readers and forum users) for number of years now. Their reviews often emphasize features their mostly mirrorless fan staff values (small size, live view shooting, casual video shooting) and often downplay the bread and butter features like IQ, DR, AF tracking, handling in the field. IMO, this make their makes their reviews extremely unreliable for shooters like us.

Anyway, the D7000 was a ground breaking DSLR, the first APS-C camera to ever to produce a full 14 EV of dynamic range, great colors, lovely viewfinder, and handling. DPR's insistence that it was essentially a mediocre camera award wise was the beginning of the end of caring about their opinion regarding camera gear (no offense guys).

11 upvotes
Tom Frerichs

Don't worry, be happy? :)

I read DPReview mostly for entertainment. On one review--don't remember the camera--after the huge number of comments, many from fan boys of competing brands, one poor poster asked, "After reading all these comments I guess I shouldn't buy any camera."

Now that we're at the point of no big tech improvements from generation to generation, reviewers are going to concentrate more on the minutiae. I expect this, but I thought this particular review was not well done.

I was a little amused that the D7200 got a score of 84%, the same as my D800E. And they never did get around to doing a full review of my D4. This just proves, to me, that scores and awards and whatever metrics you might come up with that attempt to qualify a camera beyond absolute measurements -- things like dynamic range and 18% SNR and other things of debatable value--are worth the paper they're written on.

Oh wait...this is a web site. There is no paper.

5 upvotes
pkosewski

@marike6
Today DPR is more and more about casual shooters, but is this surprising? DPR is adjusting to the reality. DSLRs might be loosing market share, but DPR doesn't want to and that's understandable.
Today they write more texts about "filters" in smartphones than lens filters... :)

Still, while I understand the switch towards mobile phones, small mirrorless etc., it is somehow sad that they're not trying to make this site more serious... The reviews are really lacking in formalism and quantitative approach compared to much smaller initiatives.

3 upvotes
GarysInSoCal

WOW... I'm confused DPR... here's a camera that's made significant improvements over it's predecessor (the D7100 with GOLD award)... yet it gets a lower review (SILVER award)... how could that be?... :/

3 upvotes
Papi61

DPR ratings reflect a particular moment in time and how the product compares to the competition at the time it's reviewed. And I fully approve this policy. Quite frankly, no DX camera can compare with the NX1 right now. And I say this as both a Nikon and an NX1 shooter.

4 upvotes
GarysInSoCal

Buzzzzz... WRONG ANSWER! DXO Mark gave the D7200 an 87 sensor score while the NX1 got an 83. The NX1 only takes 500 pics on a fully charged battery while the D7200 takes more than twice as many at 1100. The D7200 can shoot at 14bit lossless compression while the NX1 can only shoot 12bit. The D7200 has a 'optical viewfinder' while the NX1 has a battery draining and far less sharper electronic viewfinder. The NX1 only has one memory card slot while the D7200 has two. Viewfinder screen size on the D7200 is 3.2 while the NX1 is only 3.0. And the BIGGEST advantages for the D7200 is it is $300 less in price and it has 100s of Nikon (and after market) lenses and flashes that are compatible with it... :D

Comment edited 2 times, last edit 7 minutes after posting
12 upvotes
Papi61

It would be so easy for me to make a list of dozens features where the nx1 beats the d7200. But I'm not a fanboy like you and I can actually use more than one brand...

4 upvotes
tecnoworld

Gary, the nx1 has 14bit raw (12bit only in burst shooting). And, as papi said, has tons of features more/better than d7200.

The remark about evf made it clear that you never tested one, though.

Comment edited 38 seconds after posting
2 upvotes
GarysInSoCal

Hey Papi and Tecno... although I am now an FX shooter (with D750 and D810)... those features I listed would STILL be the deciding factor for me in buying the D7200 over the NX1. When your camera's battery goes dead, you are DONE shooting and that thing in your hand is now a doorstop. When you don't have the right lens for the jobs you're shooting, you're going to LOSE JOBS. The lack of lenses available for the NX1 is a SEVERE handicap in my books, not to mention the very limited dedicated flash options. I still have 3 DX lenses left, and although I am impressed with what the D7200 has to offer, as many times as Nikon comes out with 'the next best thing' in the DX lineup, I'll probably be waiting for either a D400 or a D7300... just to see what they have to offer... ;)

Comment edited 2 times, last edit 8 minutes after posting
3 upvotes
tecnoworld

Gary, of course you can have different needs, but I don't find myself needing any different lens than those I have, apart some very rare cases when I'd like to have a longer fast tele.

And a spare battery (paid 20€) allows me to double the shots. About 800-1000 shots are more than enough for any case I can find myself in.

0 upvotes
p51d007

I prefer the larger cameras myself. Some of these mirrorless cameras, I'm afraid I might break them. On my old SLR, I kept a battery pack on it, just to have a little more to hang onto.

2 upvotes
prossi

Power photographer? lol

1 upvote
Scottelly

Are you trying to say something about this D7200?

0 upvotes
Inthecage83

This thing screams 2005. It might have a grand camera under the hood but that big plastic body needs an upgrade.

2 upvotes
Scottelly

The upgrade is the D610, apparently. Too bad they don't and seemingly won't make a D400, huh?

1 upvote
Knute

Big body? It's smaller than many are looking for.

1 upvote
stq66

Why is a good sized camera, which superbly fits most of the hands for a true stable hold nowadays a disadvantage?
I tried many of the smaller cameras and could not really work with them properl, because of the size (or lack of).
And Sony especially makes small cameras but the lenses are not really smaller than the likes of C/N. So what? It only makes an improperly balanced equipment.

13 upvotes
CatchAlive

Camera is bulky when compared to mirrorless rivals"

When you'll review the new Leica Monochrom, maybe you'll list in the cons the fact it only capture monochrom pictures....

6 upvotes
erik6

Time to change my D90 ! (i will give him to my daughter)

1 upvote
axelian

hi, just did this one month ago

same ergonomics or so (well, top LCD a bit "empty" at first..)
but what a sensor and an autofocus !

should i've changed ealier (i loved my D90... but one month later, i look it as an old thing :-))

1 upvote
sankar789

Really a nice camera again from Nikon contains most advance features than D7100

0 upvotes
HarrowMan

Does the Nikon D7200 come with a built in timelapse video feature?

1 upvote
Papi61

Yep, it has an intervalometer and it even generates a Quicktime movie once the timelapse is finished. Another clever feature is exposure smoothing, which allows the camera to compensate for dramatic changes in light. Like, for example, if you're shooting a timelapse that goes from day to night.

6 upvotes
Rishi Sanyal

Thanks for reminding us of this. Updated pros in conclusion with this info.

0 upvotes
JimHohn

Anyone have any feelings or opinions on buying Nikon from discount houses like iBcart or Daxmart. I was told yesterday that a heavily discounted camera would likely be an import with no factory warranty and unable to repair at any cost.

0 upvotes
HowaboutRAW

Speaking only of this type of sale in the USA.

Respectable places selling in the grey market are very up front about it and offer their own warranty for service in the US, and the item is clearly in stock, with all necessary parts and features available with the purchase.

Disreputable grey market sellers in the USA hide the party supplying the warranty.

And egregiously often don't have the camera in stock and ready to ship. After you place an order, you'll be contacted and told the item won't be available for weeks instead of days, and would you like this different kit/item instead for a bit more monies.

3 upvotes
kalpeshmodi

Rishi,
I agree on AF. It might be little behind D7200 but for most of the shooters it is more than enough in my opinion.
I was talking about complete package. If you ever come out of Nikon/Canon syndrome you will notice it.

Thanks

0 upvotes
robjons

"Unlike some higher-end Nikons, the D7200 does not support face detection while shooting through the viewfinder (it does in live view)."

This is really what I want, and the lack of it stops me from upgrading at this point.

1 upvote
BarnET

love the sarcasm

But then it's not just the face detection that it misses.
It doesn't have that high res RGB sensor. Which means that the normal predictive 3d tracking isn't as efficient as it is in the D750.

And that probably is something you do want.

0 upvotes
K E Hoffman

Good info that explains why I jumped from the large light round area of the face, to the narrow gold area of the hair at times. Really.. Nikon is in need of a D400.. seems like they are giving up on advanced APS shooters..

0 upvotes
BarnET

That is true hoffman.

the 7d mk2 which isn't the best allround camera at all. Does come with the RGB sensor of the 1DX. Which is very similar to what Nikon is using in the D750 D810 D4s.

Which is also the main reason why it's smarter in what to lock focus on. Simply put Nikon has 2016 pixels to work with in the D7200 which isn't enough to recognize facial shapes. Which allows some camera's to directly focus on the eyes.

The D750 has 91k pixels to work with.

1 upvote
Rishi Sanyal

Technically, the 7D2 actually comes with a 150,00 RGB+IR metering sensor, as opposed to 1D X's 100,000 RGB sensor. Oddly, in our side-by-side testing, the 1DX performs better in terms of pinpoint accuracy w/ closer subjects (it also feels a bit less laggy). With distant, isolated subjects, where distance information can be used from the phase-detect sensors for tracking (i.e. how the 5D3 used to subject track), performance differences may level out - we haven't quite run enough head-to-head tests for this use-case to comment definitively.

In our little lab setup though, trying to maintain focus on the eye of the mannequin, the order of performance goes: Nikon FF > Nikon APS-C > 1DX > 7D2. Have yet to publish our 1DX/7D2 videos of this.

No matter what combination of use-case settings we use for AF on the 1DX, 7D2, or 5DS, we can't get the sort of pinpoint, lightning-fast subject tracking we see with Nikon's implementation, e.g. in the D750 here.

3 upvotes
skyflare

Thanks DPR for the great review.
I have this camera for more than 2 months now and I really liked the image quality, AF and handling.
What I dont like is the less information on the top LCD display when compared to my D7000. They made the font size bigger but with few information.
I prefer also the shutter sound of my D7000 compared to this.
Other than this, the AF, the IQ, wifi and bigger raw buffer makes it a very nice upgrade for me. Overall, Im very happy with my purchase.

1 upvote
rhurani

I noticed that if you say something good about a Nikon/Canon DSLR, there will always be somebody trying to convert you to:
- Sony, and/or
- Samsung

Seems the the S's have Conversion Brigades deployed online 24/7

5 upvotes
prossi

you just simply ignore it. I see no problem here.

0 upvotes
tecnoworld

Rhurani, sometimes it is indeed a conversion attemp, other times it's not. For example, when I referred to samsung nx1 it was just to understand why a much superior (imo) body got just a 3% more here on dpr.

Of course you have to try both to understand if nx1 is such a superior body for you as well. If you or others don't care to test, you/they should not say that nx1 is not superior ;-) simple as that.

0 upvotes
prossi

techno,
the NX1 is just different. Maybe a more complete package, with the 4k video. ISO and AF for stills? I don't know. I'd like it if they did a shootout.
Anyways don't worry. NX1 will take camera of the year this year for sure. Unless something magical comes out of sony but I doubt it.

Comment edited 4 minutes after posting
1 upvote
rhurani

technoworld I really value any addition or eye-opening piece of info in the posts, that's the reason i like to spend time reading them. but it gets annoying when people start pushing and imposing and shoving irrelevant stuff

0 upvotes
Segaman

Agree totally, its a boring trolling way of living...for 'some'!

1 upvote
Papi61

Conversely, there are people here who will try to convert you to Nikon/Canon every time a Sony, Samsung, Panasonic etc. is reviewed. Fanboysm is really bad.

Personally, I shoot, Nikon, Samsung and Panasonic and I can see pros and cons in all three.

2 upvotes
rhurani

I did not notice much Ni/Ca, not at all Pany fanboysm. S/S and to a lesser extent Oly are patrolling the allies 24/7, 365

0 upvotes
Papi61

Well, you're wrong. Every time I post a nice word on the NX1 there's inevitably someone who will insist I'm paid by the Korean company. Now Samsung may be even more of a target, because it's not only Canon/Nikon snobs, but also Apple fanboys. And often these are the same people.

Comment edited 19 seconds after posting
2 upvotes
rhurani

It's not a matter of right and wrong, I'm relatively new to photography fora and have no affection to any brand, although I have a good background in technology and know how quality tastes. I feel it when somebody is "pushing" where pushing is not necessary, and I see it always with S/S fanboys. Last thing to say: be smart guys and don't show up at each thread! let it go, skip some, take a break

1 upvote
Papi61

All fanboys are the same. The simple fact that you're pointing the finger to only one or two groups means that you've also chosen to pick a camp.

0 upvotes
Scottelly

Get a Sony A77 II instead. It's able to shoot 12 fps and does live view better. It has a bigger buffer, and it's got a fold-out screen too. What more could you ask for in an upgrade? Well, how about this . . . it's $300 less expensive than the D7200.

There's a reason why Sony is drawing so many photographers away from Nikon and Canon.

http://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/1047080-REG/sony_ilca77m2_alpha_a77_ii_dslr.html

http://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/1127271-REG/nikon_1554_d7200_dslr_camera_body.html

0 upvotes
kalpeshmodi

Pentax K3 easily beats D7200 in all aspects.

3 upvotes
Rishi Sanyal

It doesn't actually. Its AF system is far, far behind.

16 upvotes
Kim jakobsen

Yes, yes, it`s very fine... now put it back in your trousers!

4 upvotes
ClydeG

Why can't people just comment without being cheeky!

1 upvote
vesa1tahti

D7200 easily beats K3, almost in all aspects, incl. IQ.

2 upvotes
kalpeshmodi

Hello Vesa1,

I have shoot with both cameras, and apart from AF(which is faster on D7200) K3 is best camera out their in the field.
Nikon has better flash system then Pentax but other areas, like handling, ergonomics, weather sealing, IQ etc etc....Pentax K3 is solid performer.

I hope you have tried K3.

Comment edited 3 minutes after posting
1 upvote
vesa1tahti

Hello kalpeshmodi,

I've never tried K3. Only D70s, D7000 and now D7200. But I rely on tests (DP, DxO, etc.). IQ might be almost the same, maybe in D7200 a little bit better...

0 upvotes
HowaboutRAW

vesa1tahti:

I've tried the K3, Pentax has its own menu problems.

It doesn't compete with the D7200 for higher ISOs.

There a few good Pentax lenses, some with good colour, but a bit too fuzzy--some are sharp and have good color but only when stopped down.

The Nikon has a much better lens selection.

Right, the K3 is likely better weather sealed.

Comment edited 2 times, last edit 8 minutes after posting
2 upvotes
blue27

Never.

0 upvotes
Scottelly

The K3 does 8.3 fps, while the D7200 does 6 fps. The K3 does 1/180 sec. flash sync., while the D7200 does 1/250. The K3 does 1080i60, while the D7200 does 1080p60. They both have nice 3.2" screens, 100% viewfinder coverage, and great battery life. Both have lots of cross type sensors for auto-focus, but I'm willing to bet the D7200 will win in a series of auto-focus tests. There's one thing the Pentax has that's huge, but no Nikon has it. Sensor shift image stabilization, making all your lenses, even prime lenses, into image stabilized lenses. Sony has it too.

0 upvotes
JimHohn

I can't make up my mind. Will it be a D5500 or a D7200 ? I am ready to order / purchase and still confused. Any thoughts ? Please.

0 upvotes
vesa1tahti

D7200, definitely. It has screw focus motor inside. E.G. with Nikkor 10,5 mm/2,8 fisheye the autofocus doesn't work in D5500. And many older screw drive AF lenses.

3 upvotes
skyflare

@JimHohn. I suggest you get the D7200. The better/more external controls, bigger/brighter viewfinder, faster AF, burst rate and focus motor will make the D7200 a better choice compared to the D5500.

0 upvotes
Scottelly

It depends on your shooting style. If you're used to shooting with a fold-out screen, the D7200 will not do it for you. When I got my Nikon D5000 it was wonderful to have that screen. I used it so many times I felt lost without it, when someone stole my D5000 and I was stuck with my Sigma SD14. Then I got a Sony A55, and I was happy. The image quality was not exactly what I wanted, but the fold-out screen was so nice. The D5500 has great image quality AND the fold-out screen. If that's what you want, I suggest the cheaper D5500. If you need weather seals or a bigger buffer, I suggest you get the D7200 or a Sony A77 II or maybe the more expensive Nikon D750.

3 upvotes
Mr Low Notes

I totally second what you say about a fold out screen.

0 upvotes
vesa1tahti

Mirrorless cameras aren't large enough, difficult to get touch with big hands (e.g OM-D E-M1). The D7200 has the right size and weight, I feel I've got something with my money. Lenses (eg. Sigma 18-35 Art, Nikkor 18-140, Sigma 105/2,8 Macro, etc.) weight just that much they have to. A little bit heavier: more stable to shoot handheld.

Comment edited 2 minutes after posting
2 upvotes
tecnoworld

Have a look at the nx1. For me it's almost too big.

3 upvotes
JimHohn

I'm curious about the reference you make to the Nikkor 18-140. do you like or dislike and why. I am considering this lens on a D7200.

0 upvotes
vesa1tahti

I like the Nikkor 18-140. Sharp enough, tight enough zoom, a well-done all-purpose lens. Besides that, I have 9 lenses to D7200: Nikkor 18-55, Nikkor 18-70, Nikkor 18-300, Nikkor 35mm, Nikkor 40mm, Nikkor 10,5 mm, Sigma 105 mm, Sigma 18-35 mm Art, and Tokina 11-16mm DX II. Going to buy a Sigma 150-600 C for bird photography.

0 upvotes
Scottelly

I agree about the mirrorless cameras. They have their place, but only if I'm shooting with a medium format or large format camera, and I'm just documenting the shoot with the mirrorless camera. For that I can use a point-and-shoot though, right? A GH4 might be nice, with its 4K ability, but is it necessary? I'm sure mountain climbers like the lighter, more compact, mirroless options.

0 upvotes
Boky

hahaha..

Pros:
"Reasonably small, light body for a DSLR at this level"

Cons:
"Camera is bulky when compared to mirrorless rivals"

have another one for you fellas, to make it even greater joke of a review:

Cons:
Camera is even more bulkier when compared to point & shoot rivals

Keep up the good work!
Nick

6 upvotes
Mr Low Notes

Yeah, my point from my earlier comment. Compare DSLRs to DSLRs not to mirrorless and point and shoot. Of course they are smaller and lighter. DUH!!

2 upvotes
flipmac

"Camera is even more bulkier when compared to point & shoot rivals"

The keyword is "rivals" ("mirrorless rivals", which means similar IQ, performance, controls, and feature set. Actually, some mirrorless have better features, like faster liveview (obviously), articulated touch screen, better video and so on all in a smaller and lighter package.

Believe it or not, companies making these so called "mirrorless rivals" are targeting the same consumers and I'm pretty some a portion of these consumers put some kind of value in compactness; hence, the negative point about it's bulkiness.

Comment edited 3 times, last edit 12 minutes after posting
0 upvotes
Mr Low Notes

I understand that but I still wouldn't label it a "Con". Say there are smaller and even better alternatives Mirrorless or otherwise would by fine in my book but a "Con" is a reason not to buy one I would think. Moreover, In time I think all cameras will all be mirrorless. Less moving parts and complexity, and, cheaper to make. I have nothing against mirrorless. I have one. Love it. It's the way he put it I don't like.

2 upvotes
Scottelly

But it's REALLY small and light compared to a D4s, right? So why not mention the competition? The Sony A7r produces better image quality than the D7200, right? It costs more though too, just like the D810 costs more.

Maybe there really are no mirrorless rivals? We could stick our heads in the sand an imagine people who shoot DSLR cameras don't consider going mirrorless, when deciding what to upgrade to, right?

0 upvotes
Total comments: 575
123