www.fgks.org   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

JavaScript disabled. Please enable JavaScript to use My News, My Clippings, My Comments and user settings.

If you have trouble accessing our login form below, you can go to our login page.

If you have trouble accessing our login form below, you can go to our login page.

'Reinventing the ATO': Tax Office offers front-loaded pay deal

Tax Office public servants have been offered a 4.5 per cent pay rise over three years.

Tax Office public servants have been offered a 4.5 per cent pay rise over three years. Photo: Louie Douvis

The Australian Taxation Office says it can save $184 million from reducing sickies among its public servants, having them work longer hours and "reinventing the ATO".

The "productivity" drive will be used to offset a wage offer of 4.5 per cent over three years, the Office's 18,000 public servants were told on Tuesday morning.

The ATO needs to do a better job chasing super owed by employers to their workers, a review has found.

The ATO needs to do a better job chasing super owed by employers to their workers, a review has found. Photo: AFR

Another $184 million will be found in "affordability" initiatives, such as stripping workplace allowances and off-loading empty office space around Australia.

The pay deal will be front-loaded, with a 2.5 per cent pay rise paid on commencement, in a bid to win support among a workforce that has not had a pay rise in more than two years.

But despite being almost double a previous offer of 0.8 per cent, the new proposal faces opposition from unions who say the pay rise is not enough and that the proposed enterprise agreement contains conditions that will destroy the workplace rights of tax officials.

The official bulletin sent out to all staff on Tuesday morning says the ATO was able to boost the offer after a slight softening in April of the Abbott government's tough public sector workplace bargaining framework that allowed a wider interpretation of "productivity".

The main workplace union, the Community and Public Sector Union, marked out its opposition last week before the offer had been finalised saying the "the status quo is a better deal".

The smaller Australian Service Union will also oppose the deal, saying it is "totally inadequate" and with a date yet to be set for an all-staff ballot, both unions will campaign hard for a no-vote with the result to be watched keenly across the 160,000-strong Australian Public Service.

CPSU national president Alistair Waters said the deal was "insulting" and predicted it would be defeated.

"Feedback to date suggests is likely to be overwhelming,"  he said.

"Why would you vote for a deal that leaves you significantly and demonstrably worse off?"

ASU official Jeff Lapidos also gave the agreement no chance of success.

"There's going to be a no-vote, I've got no doubt about that," he said. "The only question is what the percentage will be."

An official ATO spokeswoman declined to publicly comment on Monday   on the unions' attitude.

But in his bulletin to staff, second Commissioner Geoff Leeper confirmed that the offer had been made possible by the more flexible productivity rules announced in April.

"As a result, we have reassessed our productivity and affordability measures and in doing so have been able to address some of the issues raised by employees in February 2015."

Mr Leeper said the ATO wanted to push ahead with the "de-layering" of its management structure  and wanted to scrap the executive level 2.1 and 2.2 classifications as part of the enterprise agreement and have   just one EL2 classification. 

 

 

 

21 comments so far

  • I spent decades in APS HR. Every single APS agency has a fantasy that they can achieve massive cost and productivity savings from reducing sick days. No-one has yet been able to do it. The only way you could possibly do it is by drastically reducing the actual number of sick days available, making them non-accruable, putting caps on the number of days that can be taken in a year, and requiring a medical certificate. No-one has the cojones to actually do any of that.

    Commenter
    Derek
    Date and time
    Tue Aug 11 02:27:15 UTC 2015
    • Probably should proof read before publishing, very poor journalism when sentences don't make sense.

      Commenter
      Red pen
      Date and time
      Tue Aug 11 03:06:05 UTC 2015
      • Sorry but what has that to do with the substance of the article?

        Commenter
        ex ato
        Location
        Perth
        Date and time
        Wed Aug 12 08:47:43 UTC 2015
    • Given the appalling record of the ATO Workforce to deliver any of the required functionality to support any Australian Government's Agendas over the past few decades or provide a stabler ability for Tax Payers to manage their affairs via MyGOV perhaps they could take an immediate 4.5% PAY CUT and have their salaries frozen until such time as they can demonstrate real value.

      All I see is piggies at the golden trough all whining about their overly generous benefits and conditions being striped. It is about time they learnt their privileged existence is no longer seen as the bastion of Good Public Administration but a squalor of under performing administrative deadwood with no ability to transform their ICT/Polices/Productivity to meet the Public's, Industries and International expectations.

      Commenter
      Altair76
      Location
      Canberra
      Date and time
      Tue Aug 11 03:10:46 UTC 2015
      • Staff are ham strung by proceedural and system changes where they have no input. Classic example Siebel implementation. Siebel was unsuitable for purpose, the implementation was botched, the costs far outran estimates, many senior staff refused to use it, the promised salary flowons from its sucess never happened and it interposed many additional steps that cause delays in providing responses to the public and their representatives. I worked there for 33 years and remember the days when I could provide answers to complex issues in a short time frame. Don't blame the staff as they struggle with the protocols and systems that have been forced on them.

        Commenter
        ex ato
        Location
        Perth
        Date and time
        Wed Aug 12 08:55:04 UTC 2015
    • Why would they vote for it? Because all they see is $ - They don't look at the big picture of what will be lost

      Commenter
      eh
      Date and time
      Tue Aug 11 03:17:51 UTC 2015
      • I work at the ATO. The proposed offer leaves me $64 better off the first year and $732 out of pocket for each of the two years after that. Thats -$1400 over three years. AND only if there is ZERO inflation and interest rate rises in those 3 years. Which is about as likely as me accepting that offer. So to ATO management, don't make me a decent offer, see if i care. I'll stay on my current agreement till the cows come home. That offer will COST every employee money and no employee, in or out of the ATO, public service or private enterprise would ever willingly agree to that. Now, let me get back to reading articles on how much our politicians behind these pathetic offers get in their annual raises, how they take their families on business with them, hire helicopters and cars for personal use and sit in ivory towers taking pot shots at each others integrity instead of doing the actual work they get paid SO much to do.

        Commenter
        Taxman
        Date and time
        Tue Aug 11 03:23:28 UTC 2015
        • Darn public servants! Unless the money you are going to get in yrs 2 + 3 is physically less than what you are earning now, you are not worse off! You are being paid more money each yr. Also remember, there is no guarantee that YOU will be working at the ATO in 3 yrs so

          Commenter
          Lucy
          Date and time
          Tue Aug 11 04:42:37 UTC 2015
        • Lucy, the "pay rise" that they are getting doesn't even cover the extra time they are made to work or the loss to conditions. So effectively it is a pay cut. I don't think any workplace private or public should be given a pay cut. What about the part time staff who may not have the capacity to work the extra hours for that "pay rise" they will actually LOSE money and be physically WORSE OFF!!!!

          Commenter
          Anne
          Date and time
          Tue Aug 11 23:54:44 UTC 2015
      • I wouldn't accept that offer. Other agencies said 'no way' to similar dud offers. And when you think about it, it's supply and demand - the ATO needs present staff (having foolishly got rid of a lot of staff recently) so I would personally hold out for a better offer that does not involve longer hours.
        You never get lost conditions back, they are way more valuable than crappy pay increases.

        Commenter
        Mardi
        Location
        Tuggeranong
        Date and time
        Tue Aug 11 03:24:58 UTC 2015

        More comments

        Would you like to comment?

        You will need Javascript enabled to use our Commenting Feature.

        Make a comment

        You are logged in as [Logout]

        All information entered below may be published.

        Error: Please enter your screen name.

        Error: Your Screen Name must be less than 255 characters.

        Error: Your Location must be less than 255 characters.

        Error: Please enter your comment.

        Error: Your Message must be less than 300 words.

        Post to

        You need to have read and accepted the Conditions of Use.

        Thank you

        Your comment has been submitted for approval.

        Comments are moderated and are generally published if they are on-topic and not abusive.

        Featured advertisers

        Special offers

        Credit card, savings and loan rates by Mozo