Jorginho

I don't think there is much innovation actually. There is little new. Not the first 4k, not the first BSI in a sensor, not the first PDAFOS (that is that good). To be honest: nothing is innovative...

Get the lower pixeled high performance version IMentioned. For some film was their personal prefference but they cannot shoot with kodak anymore...it is not about you and again there is an ...

So this is not correct. I am not even saying that I need but the system does and current tech means that for the (supposed) targetgroup the iq will be fine. Better than the best 1" which is not ...

it is excellent in good light and indeed seems to be even better than Sony A7II here (!!!!!). But in low light, it is not better than EM1 or so. How come?

I have looked into this Low light performance of the latest mFT sensors Now, that is shadownoise and it seems mFTs at ISO6400 does pretty well. Also, the 1"sensor is just over a stop behind. The ...

Sorry, they were here in 2010 just a year or so after mFTs. They have come a long way in a long time for an MILC. Before NX1 all NX cams were just never in the same ballpark of the competition....

Great result, highest score ever for a MILC besting the GH4 (just) by 2 points. Congrats to Samsung and a very good thing to up the ante for the others, especially APS-c sensored MILCs.

ISO6400, lightbulbmode dpreview Now this is all downsized to the same printsize, just like dxo does. It seems to me that in the shadows at least GH4 is clearly the worst, but there seems very ...

Techradar is a very sad joke in general.

How good the 7-14 f4 is can be seen here:
As can be read here:
http://slrgear.com/reviews/showproduct.php/product/1252

Is there a NEX lens 9E-lens) that performs as well.

This is sensorrelated?

There is a 14 mm equiv. Panasonic, may be you did not notice it. it is a 1000 dollar. A very good performer, but sensitive to flaring. I don't think your NEX with that adapter will get the same,...

Well I see a clear advantage of the GF7 over the Em5 MK at higher ISO. And I looked at the GH4 too and the GF7 is better than my GH4.

Just look in lightbulb mode at the green thingy + brown...

I have to wonder what was wrong with the Fuji precisely though. A D90 is moreless getting you the same IQ the EM-10 will give you. Not much in it. D90 had better focus tracking too. Single AF of ...

My experience with the Gh4 compared to the EPL5 too: the GH4 simply looks better. Not much but still...

At least Nikon understand that a camera and how good or bad it is, is not dependant on a sensor (only). SOme people over here seem to think so....

You shoot pics without a lens mounted on the cam? If not, the lenses we can chose are not small, certainly jot compared to mfts..

Even with a substantially larger sensor they lag behind mfts. EosM is like what canon dslrs are to nikons. Lacking in iq using obsolete technology. The last time canon won gold award here was ...

No ois, no buy.

? Oly pro lenses tend to score about max in many reviews. Not really. And leave you with a load of other problems. A stillborn system for instance.