Rooru S

I just checked in Amazon Germany and. The Canon cost 779EUR. The Sony cost 999EUR. And maybe in France you're paying only 80EUR more, but still you're paying more for a mediocre lens that doesn't ...

reminds me of the Sony R1

OK, you're paying 1200USD for a ZEISS lens (premium brand) that needs a lot of distorsion correction in order to perform okay, while the Canon is already corrected for most of the distorsion and ...

That's why I said that if both lenses are pretty much at the same price range, I would go for the Canon 100mm macro anyday instead of the manual-focus only Rokinon/Samyang 100mm macro. AF is very...

I don't mind if the lens perform poor compared to other optically corrected lenses. The moaning is because Sony is charging a premium price tag for a lens which the only few premium thing about it ...

There is just one thing I need to see. A comparison between the Rokinon/Samyang 100mm F2.8 Macro and the Canon non-L 100mm F2.8 USM Macro. Both are priced very close and right now there is a 50USD...

DPR...you forgot one of the best selfie-sticks... monopod! It can hold a 600mm F4 without issues (depending if you can overcome the momentum while holding it) and can hold cameras from mirrorless...

RX100M3 is the answer!

In other words, the Canon 24-70mm F4 is worth every single penny of the 999.99 price tag since it is already optically corrected for distorsion while the Sony 24-70 F2.8 should be priced around ...

Disclaimer: I have shoot with NEX-5 (my first E-mount camera and first interchangeable lens camera) ILCE-7, ILCE-7S, SEL16F28 (+converters), SEL1855, SEL2870, SEL55F18Z and SEL35F28Z. Also shoot ...

You should ask this on the E-mount forum (since you're asking about LA-EA4 and 7-series cameras) Anyways, I tried both lenses on the a77Mk.II, a99 and a850. The 20mm F2.8 is great for landscapes. ...

I would go for the Sony 16-50mm F2.8 SSM. Why? If you're going to take pictures of people and group of people, you're not going to get past 50mm on APS-C and you're going to need every mm at the ...

What a silly comment. Lens corrections stretch the image which results in softness (which makes me able to finally understand the softness reported by several reviewers and websites). Too bad for ...

@Jun2: So if you are really aware the NX1 should outperform all those cameras (which had price tags above 1000USD) why are you asking Samsung to sell it at 1000USD?

Also, good thing you mentioned...

The NX1 outperforms the NEX-7 (which retailed above 1000USD back then, and still outperforms the EM1 (which retails at 1200USD) and the GH4 (which retails around 1400USD). And you're here asking...

The issue is about using E-mount cameras with an A-mount adapter (pick your choice of LA-EA adapters) and then put a teleconverter on it with the G-lens of your choice. I have tried the NEX-5, ...

Are you believing what SAR writes? It seems you forgot when they told people that in 2014 we would see a ton of Fullframe A-mount announcement and developments. We got nothing. Rumours are based on ...

You do realize...both A and E mount are so different there is no way to do it without charging a ton of money? Just look at the connector pins, bayonet type, diameter difference, aperture control ...

Also Teleconverters (at least the ones made by Sony) don't work with A to E-mount adapters. You loose aperture control and AF. I have tried the SAL14TC and SAL20TC with SAL70200G, SAL70400G2, ...

Let's be real. 150USD for a better adapter than LA-EA4? No way. I can see a new adapter with A77II AF module sold at the same price the current LA-EA4 is being sold and then offer the LA-EA4 at ...